Connect with us

Business

Pot and Parenting – A Match Made in Heaven? (Tips for the New Cannabis-Parenting Generation)

Published

on

Why cannabis is helping millions of people becoem better parents each month!

In some parts of the United States, parents are losing custody to their children for smoking cannabis. Of course, this isn’t the norm seeing that 33-states have already some form of legalization on the books. But in some places, parents have had to fight for the custody of their children due to their cannabis use. In fact, even in legal states this can happen, as was the case for “A Washington state couple who use medical marijuana and own a marijuana dispensary have been reunited with their five-year-old son after losing custody, with child protective services saying they were not fit parents because they were high all the time.” – Source: DailyMail

CPS called them “unfit” parents due to their cannabis use. However, as it turned out, they weren’t. It was simply a disgruntled employee who reported them to Child Protective Services after being fired from their dispensary.

While this story happened nearly six years ago from the time of writing this article, cannabis use are frequently cited in custody battles as “grounds” for not granting a parent rights to their child. They are called “unfit” while it’s perfectly okay to have a few bottles of Whiskey in your house or to have a “night cap”.

In the case of alcohol consumption, you’d have to be physically violent with a child before you are ever questioned to be “unfit”.

A similar story happened in California to a man named, Nathanial Rudd, who found out he was going to be a dad on the day of his son’s birth. A social worker told Nathanial that the mother was not going to be able to take the child home, and so Rudd started petitioning for custody.

Cannabis is legal in the state of California. Rudd was using it for medical reasons due to a car accident, and was treating his pain. Yet, despite the drug test coming back “inconclusive” – since Rudd stopped using cannabis several days prior (he used it only when it was getting tough to deal with the pain) but was told that he was “cognitively incapable” of caring for the child due to his marijuana use.

His child, baby Peter, was placed into foster care and Rudd, according to this article in the Californian – was still fighting for custody over a year later. Of course, this was prior to Prop 64, which granted medical marijuana patients protection from this kind of malarkey.

CPS noted that this was just the way they do things;

“With any drug, there must be a nexus between drug activity or inactivity that directly threatens the safety of the child,” said Michael Weston, spokesman for the California Department of Social Services. “Does the child have access to the drugs? Is the parent incapacitated to the point where they can’t properly care for the child?”

However, it’s clear that this was not the case. There was never any real follow up from the CPS to determine these factors, rather – his admission of being a medical marijuana patient was the main reason why his child was removed from his custody.

This is something that can occur all over the United States as noted by Rachel Beth;

“The problem is that there is no real way for parents to protect themselves,” said Rachel Beth Wissner, an outreach associate with Massachusetts-based Family Law & Cannabis Alliance. “They can act completely legally under the law – even be more careful, diligent and safe than the laws require – and they can still find themselves at the mercy of child protection services and the courts solely for marijuana.”

Of course, cannabis has gone a lot more mainstream since then, however, until there are federal protections – CPS and similar agencies can utilize cannabis use as a weapon against parents.

They call them “unfit” or “mentally incapable of caring” for their children, even if they provide them with more care than a “non-smoker”. Yet, we do not see the same zeal when it comes to alcohol consumption – which is often a vehicle for familiar violence and child negligence.

However, today I’m not here to outline these sad cases but rather argue why cannabis should be prescribed to parents…since raising children can be incredibly stressful.

I have recently become a first parent and can tell you that cannabis has helped me reflect on my own emotional responses when under stress due to parenting.

Being a Parent is TOUGH!

While having a child is one of the best things I have ever done in my entire life – I love being a dad! It’s also incredibly difficult and stressful.

When you bring back a newborn, you can say goodbye to sleep. You’ll wake up every few hours to feed the infant, change diapers, and shuffle about trying to rock the baby back to sleep.

After about three months, babies typically learn to sleep through the evening. At least this was true for my son. However, at 3-months old, they begin to have an interest in the world around them. Their need for attention only continues to increase and if there’s one thing you can hear from parents of young children it’s this; “Man I’m fucking tired!”

Then they learn to walk.

From this moment on, you’re completely focused on keeping your child alive. They want to walk everywhere, pick up anything and stuff it into their baby mouths. They also start developing a temper. My kid is now about 14 months old and if you’re not keeping your eye on him, he’ll have something in his mouth or will be rushing off to some danger zone that can end his life.

His mother – my partner – is taking the bulk of the burden and this is because in most cases mothers essentially sacrifice their own individuality in order to raise a child. Of course, there are some “stay at home dads” that do the same, but it’s never the same as a mother.

It’s true that a mother has one of the toughest jobs in the world!

When a kid reaches 2-years of age, they call it “The Terrible Twos”. This is because you can expect tantrums after tantrums when they don’t get their way. They will scream in the middle of a busy mall making you look like the biggest asshole on the planet.

Throughout this entire time – you’ve got to keep your cool!

Why? Because most people’s traumas stem from their childhood and if you think that you weren’t traumatized as a child – guess again. We’re all damaged good from our parents, irrespective of their good intentions.

This is because as a parent, you learn that your parents were just as inexperienced parents when they had you.

Early childhood trauma generally refers to the traumatic experiences that occur to children aged 0-6. Because infants’ and young children’s reactions may be different from older children’s, and because they may not be able to verbalize their reactions to threatening or dangerous events, many people assume that young age protects children from the impact of traumatic experiences. A growing body of research has established that young children may be affected by events that threaten their safety or the safety of their parents/caregivers, and their symptoms have been well documented. These traumas can be the result of intentional violence—such as child physical or sexual abuse, or domestic violence—or the result of natural disaster, accidents, or war. Young children also may experience traumatic stress in response to painful medical procedures or the sudden loss of a parent/caregiver. – Source: NCTSN

Of course, the traumas listed above are REAL traumatic events, but what about minor traumas. What about the emotional inept people who have children. Parents who “lose their shit” and who end up yelling at their kids?

These minor traumas also impact your kids and even if you’re the best parent in the world, you are guilty of some of these minor traumas, whether it’s from “neglecting your child” because you were tweeting some funny thing you found online, or whether you simply couldn’t handle the excessive crying that’s been going on for days.

Not to mention, you’re also responsible for feeding them, clothing them, and making sure that they have everything they need. This is stress + anxiety + fear all wrapped into one experience where your child’s health and wellness is at stake.

For the past two weeks, I have been doing Sober October, and have experienced what it means to be a parent without smoking weed. And boy, has it been tough at times!

Here’s why I think parents should not only be allowed to consume cannabis, but why in some cases it should be mandatory.

Pot and Parenthood

Firstly, before I start this section of the article it’s important to note that I’m not advocating that you smoke blunts or bongrip in front of your kids. Far from it.

You can consume cannabis responsibly and that is typically at the end of the day, or during the day, but very sparingly.

A toke or two will not render you incapable of caring for your child. It simply takes the edge off, and allows you to engage with your child in a more caring and integrated fashion.

Here’s the reasons why cannabis and caring for your kid is a match made in heaven:

  1. Stress Mitigation: As mentioned, when you are a parent you’re under a lot of stress. If your kid has the flu, you’re worried. If he doesn’t…you’re still worried. Did they eat something? Is that a snail in his mouth! They just won’t stop crying! All of these factors create a constant state of stress and anxiety.

    Cannabis can help you deal with this accumulative stress and anxiety and give you a moment to “breathe”. It can allow you to reset your emotional state and simply reconnect with the self. Since taking care of a child isn’t a race but a marathon, smoking a bowl at the end of the day to relax, or taking a hit when you’ve “HAD ENOUGH!” can allow you to shift back into the “good parent role”.
  2. You become more mindful: A lot of times when we become emotional, we enter into a “state of automation”. In other words, the emotion overtakes us and we simply react. Smoking cannabis gives you a second to think. It allows you to become mindful of your own reactions and you have the opportunity to choose better. Getting angry at an infant has nothing to do with the infant and everything to do about the emotions you harbor inside. Perhaps, you’re getting angry because of some early childhood trauma gifted to you from your parents. When you get triggered by the same stuff from your own child, you automatically play out this script.

    Consuming cannabis can help you become aware of these automated scripts and in turn, you can change the way you react to the situation. You can stop the cycle and give your kid a chance at a different fate than your own.
  3. You can handle kid music: I don’t call him Elmo…I call him HELLMO! Sesame Street is fine once in a while, but kids learn through repetition. This means that you’ll hear the same baby song over, and over, and over, and over, and over, and over, and over- again!

    It’s fucking madness! Yet, smoke a bowl, get a bit stoned – and all of a sudden you’re engaged in the moment. You’re singing, dancing, pointing out your “head, shoulders, knees and toes” and getting a workout all in one.

    Why?

    You decided to get a bit blitzed and now those furry monsters cease to become the bane of your existence and rather you can form part of the educational experience. For me, I can even appreciate some of the music, listening to the basslines, or the rhyme schemes…your mind starts working differently.
  4. You’re NOT incapacitated: Unlike with alcohol, cannabis doesn’t incapacitate you. You’re not clumsier…you’re just stoned. This is especially true for people who have been smoking a long time. While I make it a point not to smoke in front of my kid, I can go and take 2-3 tokes in the bathroom, and come out without missing a beat.
  5. You can make some FIRE baby food: My kid eats amazingly. This is because as a stoner, I have learned the fine art of munchies…and as a father, I create healthy munchies for my kid. I’m his personal chef and as a result, my kid eats healthy, unprocessed foods thanks to my enjoyment of cooking and making food. Of course, not every stoner can cook, but most stoners know how to make a good healthy munchie.
  6. You’re better with your partner: This is especially true if you both smoke cannabis. Accumulative stress from caring for a baby can often result in you taking out your frustration on your significant other. Cannabis helps mitigate this stress build up allowing you to enjoy your partner and not pay your own stress anxiety forward to them.
  7. It keeps you healthy: One thing that stress and anxiety does to the body is lower the immune system. A lowered immune system means you’d be prone to diseases. Babies, are carriers of diseases. Their immune system is being exposed to all the elements and there are viruses that they get that we may have never had. Therefore, having a healthy immune system is key to being able to be a good parent. I have only gotten sick once and that was because of Covid. Since then, I have been able to care for my kid – even if he felt a bit under the weather. Cannabis helps keep my body in homeostasis and keeps my immune system strong.

Bottom Line:

I think it’s time in society that we recognize that it’s okay for parents to use substances like cannabis to deal with the stress of parenthood. I have found great relief in it, and I have felt the absence of cannabis during my sober October.

Interestingly enough, I only crave cannabis on few occasions – especially when I’m up at 3 AM bouncing my boy back to sleep. Sometimes, you simply can’t fall back asleep after being violently awoken in the middle of the night with baby screaming.

A smooth bowl of weed, a hot glass of milk – and you’re counting Zs before you know it. I’m not saying all parents SHOULD smoke weed, I’m saying that it’s not a bad option to help with all the stress and anxiety that comes with the territory.

If you’re a cannabis parent, how has weed helped you through the difficulties of raising a kid? I’d love to hear about it so drop me a reply in the comments!

Source: https://cannabis.net/blog/opinion/pot-and-parenting-a-match-made-in-heaven-tips-for-the-new-cannabisparenting-generation

Business

EU Pressure Builds on Google as Regulators Face Calls for Massive Fine Over Search Practices

Published

on

By

A growing coalition of European industry groups is intensifying pressure on regulators to take decisive action against Google over allegations of unfair search practices that could reshape competition rules across the region’s digital economy.

Investigation Under Digital Markets Act Gains Momentum

The case is being examined by the European Commission under the European Union’s landmark Digital Markets Act (DMA), introduced to curb the dominance of major technology platforms and ensure fair competition.

Launched in March 2024, the investigation focuses on whether Google has been prioritising its own services in search results, potentially disadvantaging rival businesses that rely on online visibility to reach customers.

Industry Groups Demand Swift Action

Several prominent European organizations have jointly urged regulators to conclude the probe without further delay. They argue that prolonged investigations allow alleged anti-competitive practices to continue, putting European companies—especially startups—at a disadvantage.

Signatories include the European Publishers Council, the European Magazine Media Association, the European Tech Alliance, and EU Travel Tech.

In a joint statement, these groups warned that delays in enforcement are affecting innovation, profitability, and growth prospects for regional businesses competing in digital markets.

Google Denies Allegations

Google has rejected claims of bias, stating that its search algorithms are designed to deliver the most relevant and useful results to users. The company has also proposed adjustments to address regulatory concerns.

However, critics argue that these changes are insufficient and fail to address the core issue of market dominance.

Potential Billion-Euro Penalties

If found in violation of the DMA, Google could face significant financial penalties. Under EU rules, fines can reach a substantial percentage of a company’s global turnover, potentially amounting to billions of euros.

Regulators may also impose corrective measures requiring changes to business practices, which could have long-term implications for how digital platforms operate in Europe.

Wider Implications for Big Tech

The case highlights ongoing tensions between European regulators and major U.S. technology firms. In recent years, the EU has taken a more aggressive stance in enforcing competition laws, aiming to create a level playing field for local businesses.

A final ruling against Google could set a major precedent, influencing future enforcement actions and shaping the regulatory landscape for global tech companies operating within Europe.

As scrutiny intensifies, the outcome of the investigation is expected to play a critical role in defining the future of digital competition across the European Union.

Continue Reading

AI & Technology

Amazon Faces Potential Criminal Trial in Italy Over €1.2 Billion Tax Evasion Allegations

Published

on

By

Milan: U.S. tech giant Amazon is facing the prospect of a major legal showdown in Italy, after prosecutors in Milan formally requested a court to move forward with criminal proceedings over alleged tax evasion totaling approximately ₹12,500 crore (€1.2 billion).

The case targets Amazon’s European division along with four senior executives, marking one of the most significant tax-related investigations involving a global e-commerce platform in Europe.

Trial Push Despite Multi-Million Euro Settlement

The move comes even after Amazon reached a financial settlement with Italian tax authorities in December, agreeing to pay around ₹5,500 crore (€527 million), including interest, to resolve part of the dispute.

Typically, such settlements lead to the closure of criminal investigations. However, Milan prosecutors have opted to proceed, signaling a tougher stance on alleged corporate tax violations.

A preliminary hearing is expected in the coming months, where a judge will decide whether to formally indict the company and its executives or dismiss the case.

Allegations of VAT Evasion Through Marketplace Sellers

At the center of the investigation are claims that Amazon’s platform enabled non-European Union sellers to avoid paying value-added tax (VAT) on goods sold to Italian consumers between 2019 and 2021.

Prosecutors allege that the company’s marketplace structure allowed thousands of foreign vendors—many reportedly based in China—to operate without fully disclosing their identities or tax obligations. This, authorities argue, led to substantial VAT losses for the Italian government.

Under Italian law, online platforms facilitating sales can be held partially liable if third-party sellers fail to comply with tax requirements, a key point in the prosecution’s case.

Italian Government Named as Affected Party

In their filing, prosecutors identified Italy’s Economy Ministry as the injured party, citing significant financial damage resulting from the alleged tax evasion.

Legal experts say the outcome of the case could have wide-ranging implications across the European Union, where VAT systems are harmonized and similar compliance rules apply to digital marketplaces.

Multiple Investigations Add to Pressure

The VAT probe is just one of several legal challenges facing Amazon in Italy. The European Public Prosecutor’s Office is reportedly examining additional tax-related issues covering more recent years.

Meanwhile, Milan authorities are pursuing separate investigations into alleged customs fraud linked to imports from China and whether Amazon maintained an undeclared “permanent establishment” in Italy—potentially exposing it to higher tax liabilities.

In a separate regulatory action, Italy’s data protection authority recently ordered an Amazon unit to stop using personal data from over 1,800 employees at a warehouse near Rome.

Amazon Denies Allegations

Amazon has consistently denied wrongdoing and indicated it will strongly contest the allegations in court if the case proceeds. The company has also warned that prolonged legal uncertainty could impact investor confidence and Italy’s appeal as a destination for international business.

Broader Impact on Europe’s Digital Economy

If the case moves to trial, it could become a landmark moment for the regulation of global e-commerce platforms in Europe. Governments across the region are increasingly scrutinizing how digital marketplaces handle tax compliance, especially in cross-border transactions.

With online retail continuing to expand, regulators are under mounting pressure to ensure that multinational platforms and third-party sellers adhere to the same tax rules as traditional businesses.

Continue Reading

Aviation

IndiGo Crisis Exposes Risks of Monopoly: What If Telecom or E-commerce Collapses Next?

Published

on

By

Airports across India witnessed scenes of distress and confusion as thousands of passengers were stranded due to IndiGo’s massive flight disruptions. Families with medical emergencies, funerals, and personal crises were left helpless as the airline cancelled hundreds of flights without adequate communication or support.

Passengers described desperate situations — a mother pleading for sanitary pads for her daughter, a woman unable to transport her husband’s coffin, and others stranded while trying to reach family funerals or hospitals. “It was like a lockdown at the airport,” one passenger said, describing the panic that unfolded as IndiGo’s mismanagement crippled operations nationwide.

Root Cause: IndiGo’s Market Monopoly

The turmoil, industry experts argue, stems from IndiGo’s monopolistic control over India’s domestic aviation market. The airline operates nearly 2,100 flights daily and holds around 60% market share — meaning every second plane flying within India belongs to IndiGo.

This dominance has given the company unparalleled influence. When IndiGo falters, the entire aviation system suffers. Passengers are left with few alternatives, as other airlines lack capacity to absorb stranded travellers. The result: skyrocketing ticket prices, chaos at terminals, and total dependence on a single private operator.

Aviation pioneer Captain G.R. Gopinath, founder of Air Deccan, criticised the government’s inaction, noting that on some routes, IndiGo’s economy fares surged to ₹1 lakh. He compared the situation to a hostage crisis, writing that the airline “held the system ransom” and forced regulators to defer new safety rules meant to protect pilots and passengers.

Government Intervention and Regulatory Weakness

The crisis erupted after IndiGo failed to comply with the Flight Duty Time Limitations (FDTL) — rules introduced by the DGCA in January 2024 requiring adequate rest for pilots. Despite having nearly two years to adapt, IndiGo blamed the rule for operational disruptions, citing a shortage of pilots.

Under mounting public pressure, the government stepped in, temporarily relaxing FDTL norms and capping airfare hikes. Officials claimed the move was to protect passengers, but analysts say it exposed the state’s vulnerability to corporate monopolies. “The government had no option but to yield,” said one aviation policy expert, pointing out that ignoring safety regulations for short-term relief could have long-term consequences.

The crisis also rekindled memories of the June 2025 Air India crash near London, which claimed over 240 lives. Experts warn that compromising pilot rest and safety standards to maintain flight schedules could risk another tragedy.

If Telecom Giants Fail: A National Paralysis

The article raises a troubling question — what if a similar crisis struck the telecom sector, where Jio and Airtel together control nearly 80% of subscribers and serve over 780 million users?

If both networks failed simultaneously, the repercussions would be catastrophic. Internet shutdowns would halt UPI transactions, online banking, OTP verifications, video calls, OTT streaming, and emergency communications. Critical services such as airports, hospitals, stock exchanges, and small businesses — many of which rely on WhatsApp and digital payments — would come to a standstill.

In essence, a telecom breakdown could paralyse India’s digital economy, exposing the nation’s dependence on a duopoly.

E-commerce Monopoly: Another Fragile Ecosystem

The same risk looms over the e-commerce sector, where Amazon and Flipkart dominate nearly 80% of the market. A disruption similar to IndiGo’s could cripple daily life — halting delivery of groceries, medicines, and essential goods, freezing refunds and customer support, and leaving small sellers without platforms to trade.

Local retailers, freed from competition, might exploit shortages by inflating prices. Such a scenario underscores the perils of market centralisation in sectors critical to everyday living.

A Wake-Up Call for Regulators

The IndiGo crisis, analysts say, is a warning shot for policymakers and regulators. A single company’s operational failure exposed systemic weaknesses in India’s infrastructure and consumer protection mechanisms.

As the aviation regulator DGCA investigates and IndiGo works to restore normalcy, the broader lesson remains clear: unchecked monopoly power in any essential service — whether air travel, telecom, or e-commerce — poses a direct threat to economic stability and citizen welfare.

Without stronger competition laws, redundancy frameworks, and regulatory oversight, India risks repeating this crisis across multiple sectors — each time with millions of citizens paying the price.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 420 Reports Marijuana News & Information Website | Reefer News | Cannabis News