Business
Former execs of Canadian cannabis producer CannTrust acquitted in ‘quasi-criminal’ case
Three former executives of Canadian cannabis producer CannTrust, including its ex-CEO, have been acquitted of all charges after the case collapsed this week.
The charges came from a nearly two-year joint investigation by the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) and Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) after a whistleblower alerted Canada’s cannabis regulator in 2019 about five “unlicensed” cultivation rooms the company had been operating since 2018.
Peter Aceto, the company’s CEO at the time of the alleged incidents, had been charged with fraud and making false or misleading statements to the OSC and to the market, among other purported infractions.
Mark Litwin, formerly a director of the company, and Eric Paul, a former CannTrust chair, faced fraud and insider trading charges, among others.
The charges under the Securities Act (Ontario) had been described as “quasi-criminal” by the OSC.
The Financial Post newspaper reported that a key witness had testified a week earlier in the Ontario Court of Justice that he was mistaken about using the term “unlicensed” to describe “noncompliant” cannabis growing areas in the company’s Pelham greenhouse.
The key witness’ confusion over the terms “unlicensed” and “noncompliant” apparently caused the OSC to concede there was no reasonable prospect of conviction.
However, the company itself said in a 2019 news release that it grew cannabis “in unlicensed rooms,” and Canada’s federal cannabis regulator, Health Canada, also had said some of the rooms used in the company’s greenhouse were “unlicensed.”
A lawyer for one of the defendants presented as evidence a Nov. 9, 2018, license covering “the entire Pelham greenhouse,” the Financial Post reported, which was reportedly within documents seized by the OSC.
CannTrust’s federal licenses, including the one covering the Pelham greenhouse, were suspended for about nine months starting in September 2019.
‘Law seems to be against you’
CannTrust, now called Phoena Holdings, did not immediately respond to MJBizDaily queries for comment.
Justice Victor Giourgas said he was persuaded to acquit the three former executives based on the law and the arguments of the defense attorneys, the Financial Post reported.
The newspaper reported that the justice had rejected the OSC’s attempt to withdraw the charges.
“The law seems to be against you,” the justice reportedly told the OSC lawyers.
In a statement to MJBizDaily, the OSC said it’s considering the implications of the decision and assessing its options “in light of the significant investor losses following the issuance of CannTrust’s press release on July 8, 2019.”
In that news release, CannTrust stated that it received a “noncompliant” rating from Health Canada “based on observations by the regulator regarding the growing of cannabis in five unlicensed rooms and inaccurate information provided to the regulator by CannTrust employees.”
“Growing in unlicensed rooms took place from October 2018 to March 2019 during which time CannTrust had pending applications for these rooms with Health Canada,” the company said at the time.
‘No unlicensed growing’
Scott Fenton and Michelle Psutka, counsel to Litwin, said in a statement to MJBizDaily that their client conducted himself lawfully and ethically during his tenure as a member of CannTrust’s board.
“There was no credible evidence that he knew about unlicensed growing at CannTrust and the trial evidence conclusively proved that no unlicensed growing ever took place,” they said in a statement issued on behalf of Litwin.
“Mr. Litwin looks forward to vindicating his good reputation and erasing the stain caused by this ill-founded prosecution.”
In the statement, Litwin thanked the OSC for dismissing the changes as unprovable.
Gerald Chan, who, along with Paul Le Vay, has been representing Paul, said the former chair earned a reputation as a leader with integrity over a distinguished business career.
“That reputation was unfairly tarnished by a misguided prosecution,” the lawyers said in a statement to MJBizDaily.
“Mr. Paul maintained from the beginning that when the evidence was revealed, it would show that he had done nothing wrong. That evidence has now emerged, and Mr. Paul has been declared innocent.
“We are thrilled that he has been fully and finally vindicated.”
Legal representatives for Aceto, the company’s former CEO, did not immediately respond to MJBizDaily‘s request for comment.
Health Canada still says ‘unlicensed’
In an email to MJBizDaily late Thursday, Health Canada said it hit CannTrust with “critical observations” and a noncompliant rating after an unannounced inspection on June 17, 2019, at the Pelham facility.
“The critical observations were for conducting unauthorized activities, namely producing cannabis in unlicensed rooms before obtaining approval from Health Canada, providing false and misleading information to inspectors during the course of the inspection, and inadequate record keeping,” a Health Canada spokesperson wrote.
Health Canada said that producing cannabis in “unlicensed” rooms had been considered “noncompliant” with federal regulations governing the industry at that time, because federal license holders were required to receive federal approval before making changes to a production-site plan.
Health Canada used the word “unlicensed” to describe the rooms in question.
But in 2020, the federal regulator notified cannabis production licensees they were no longer required to submit such an amendment for review and approval by Health Canada.
Health Canada stated that ensuring the integrity of the legal cannabis production system is a priority for the Canadian government.
“That is why the federally regulated system contains multiple measures that are designed to protect the health and safety of Canadians and the integrity of the system,” the spokesperson wrote.
“These measures include stringent requirements for physical and personnel security, record keeping, inventory controls and reporting that are verified through Health Canada inspections and other regulatory oversight activities.”
Fenton, who has been representing Litwin, told MJBizDaily that the Health Canada statement regarding the “unlicensed” rooms “is factually and legally incorrect.”
Business
Jio’s 1,600-Satellite LEO Constellation Gets Technical Green Light
Reliance Jio has crossed a significant milestone in its space connectivity ambitions after its proposal to deploy a Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite constellation of around 1,600 satellites received a positive technical assessment from the Indian National Space Promotion and Authorisation Centre (IN-SPACe).
The evaluation, conducted jointly by IN-SPACe, the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO), and the Wireless Planning and Coordination (WPC) wing of the Department of Telecommunications, reportedly concluded that Jio’s proposed system meets the required technical standards and is comparable to leading global satellite broadband networks.
India’s Indigenous LEO Satellite Vision
Under the proposal, Reliance Jio plans to deploy between 1,600 and 1,650 satellites in Low Earth Orbit at an altitude of around 650 kilometres.
The planned constellation is expected to provide high-speed satellite connectivity across India, with approximately 32 satellites visible from any location at a given time. The company aims to roll out the network within the next two to three years, subject to regulatory approvals.
According to industry estimates, the satellite system could deliver 4.5 to 5 terabits per second (Tbps) of total data capacity, making it one of the largest satellite broadband projects proposed in India.
The project is expected to require an investment of $10–15 billion (approximately ₹95,000 crore to ₹1.42 lakh crore), reflecting the scale of infrastructure needed for satellite manufacturing, launches, ground stations, and user terminals.
Regulatory Process Moves Forward
Following the successful technical review, the proposal is expected to move into the next phase of regulatory approvals.
The government may now assist Jio in securing orbital slots, coordinating spectrum usage, and filing applications with the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), the global body responsible for managing satellite orbit and frequency allocations.
Obtaining orbital rights remains a critical step, as Low Earth Orbit has become increasingly competitive due to the growing number of satellite broadband projects being planned worldwide.
Officials also indicated that the proposed satellite architecture has been designed to coexist with future Indian LEO constellations, allowing multiple domestic operators to share orbital resources efficiently.
Broadband, Mobile Connectivity, and Strategic Applications
Jio plans to use the satellite network to provide a range of communication services, including satellite broadband, mobile backhaul, enterprise connectivity, and direct-to-device (D2D) satellite communication, particularly in remote and underserved regions where conventional telecom infrastructure is limited.
The company also intends to establish 20 to 22 ground stations across India to support network operations.
Apart from commercial telecommunications, officials have highlighted the project’s potential strategic importance. A domestically developed satellite constellation could strengthen India’s communication infrastructure, reduce dependence on foreign satellite operators, and support national security requirements.
Reports suggest preliminary discussions are underway regarding the possibility of integrating defence-related payloads into some satellites, enabling both civilian and strategic use.
Major Step for India’s Space and Telecom Sectors
Industry analysts view the technical clearance as an important milestone in India’s expanding private space ecosystem. If Jio secures the remaining regulatory approvals and international orbital clearances, the project could become the country’s first large-scale indigenous LEO satellite broadband network.
The initiative also aligns with India’s broader efforts to expand digital connectivity while strengthening its presence in the global satellite communications market.
Business
Alleged Crores Pharma Scam Mastermind Arrested from Surat
After evading law enforcement for nearly 13 years, an accused linked to a large-scale pharmaceutical fraud case has been arrested by Delhi Police from Surat, Gujarat. The suspect is alleged to have orchestrated a series of financial scams involving fake identities, forged documents, and dishonoured cheques used to procure high-value pharmaceutical raw materials.
Authorities say the accused, identified as Himmat Singh Lodha, is believed to have defrauded multiple pharmaceutical companies in Delhi of goods worth approximately ₹98 lakh before disappearing and remaining underground for years.
Fake Business Deals and Dishonoured Cheques Used in Fraud
Investigators claim the accused posed as a legitimate pharmaceutical trader and placed bulk orders for expensive drug ingredients, offering post-dated cheques as payment security.
In one documented case from 2013, he allegedly obtained around 550 kilograms of Gliclazide, a diabetes-related pharmaceutical ingredient, valued at over ₹26 lakh. When suppliers attempted to encash the cheques, they were reportedly returned with the remark “account closed.”
Following the transaction, the accused allegedly vacated his office and rented residence and disappeared without settling payments. He was later declared a proclaimed offender in 2016 after repeatedly failing to appear before court proceedings. Authorities had also issued a reward for information leading to his arrest.
Multiple Identities and Repeated Fraud Pattern
Police investigations further link the accused to another cheating case dating back to 2012, where he allegedly used a fake identity, “Kailash Jain,” to obtain a large consignment of Ambroxol HCL, a pharmaceutical compound used in cough medications. The value of that consignment was estimated at around ₹72 lakh.
Officials believe the accused followed a consistent modus operandi—posing as a credible businessman, securing high-value goods on deferred payment terms, and then disappearing after delivery while shutting down business operations.
Investigators suspect that forged business records, fake company credentials, and fabricated financial histories were used to build trust with suppliers and gain access to expensive raw materials.
Multi-State Surveillance Leads to Arrest in Surat
A special Crime Branch team tracked the accused through coordinated surveillance efforts across multiple cities, including Mumbai, Ahmedabad, and Surat. After nearly a month of technical monitoring and intelligence gathering, officials located and arrested him from a residential area in Surat.
Authorities also revealed that the accused had been involved in property-related activities while staying under the radar to avoid detection.
Growing Threat of Corporate Identity Fraud
The case highlights a rising trend of organised financial fraud targeting industries that rely heavily on trust-based transactions and deferred payments. Experts note that criminals increasingly exploit gaps in corporate verification systems by using fake GST registrations, temporary offices, and forged documentation to appear legitimate.
Cybercrime and financial fraud specialists warn that such schemes are becoming more complex with the widespread availability of digital business tools, making it easier to create convincing but fraudulent corporate identities.
Experts Urge Stronger Due Diligence in High-Value Transactions
Experts, including former IPS officer and cybercrime specialist Prof. Triveni Singh, emphasize the need for stricter verification procedures in commercial dealings. He noted that relying solely on paperwork or digital business profiles can expose companies to significant financial risk.
Authorities and industry experts recommend physical verification of business operations, bank account validation, and detailed background checks before engaging in high-value or deferred-payment transactions—particularly in sectors like pharmaceuticals, where single consignments can involve transactions worth crores.
Business
EU Pressure Builds on Google as Regulators Face Calls for Massive Fine Over Search Practices
A growing coalition of European industry groups is intensifying pressure on regulators to take decisive action against Google over allegations of unfair search practices that could reshape competition rules across the region’s digital economy.
Investigation Under Digital Markets Act Gains Momentum
The case is being examined by the European Commission under the European Union’s landmark Digital Markets Act (DMA), introduced to curb the dominance of major technology platforms and ensure fair competition.
Launched in March 2024, the investigation focuses on whether Google has been prioritising its own services in search results, potentially disadvantaging rival businesses that rely on online visibility to reach customers.
Industry Groups Demand Swift Action
Several prominent European organizations have jointly urged regulators to conclude the probe without further delay. They argue that prolonged investigations allow alleged anti-competitive practices to continue, putting European companies—especially startups—at a disadvantage.
Signatories include the European Publishers Council, the European Magazine Media Association, the European Tech Alliance, and EU Travel Tech.
In a joint statement, these groups warned that delays in enforcement are affecting innovation, profitability, and growth prospects for regional businesses competing in digital markets.
Google Denies Allegations
Google has rejected claims of bias, stating that its search algorithms are designed to deliver the most relevant and useful results to users. The company has also proposed adjustments to address regulatory concerns.
However, critics argue that these changes are insufficient and fail to address the core issue of market dominance.
Potential Billion-Euro Penalties
If found in violation of the DMA, Google could face significant financial penalties. Under EU rules, fines can reach a substantial percentage of a company’s global turnover, potentially amounting to billions of euros.
Regulators may also impose corrective measures requiring changes to business practices, which could have long-term implications for how digital platforms operate in Europe.
Wider Implications for Big Tech
The case highlights ongoing tensions between European regulators and major U.S. technology firms. In recent years, the EU has taken a more aggressive stance in enforcing competition laws, aiming to create a level playing field for local businesses.
A final ruling against Google could set a major precedent, influencing future enforcement actions and shaping the regulatory landscape for global tech companies operating within Europe.
As scrutiny intensifies, the outcome of the investigation is expected to play a critical role in defining the future of digital competition across the European Union.
-
Business3 years agoPot Odor Does Not Justify Probable Cause for Vehicle Searches, Minnesota Court Affirms
-
Business3 years agoNew Mexico cannabis operator fined, loses license for alleged BioTrack fraud
-
Business3 years agoAlabama to make another attempt Dec. 1 to award medical cannabis licenses
-
Business3 years agoWashington State Pays Out $9.4 Million in Refunds Relating to Drug Convictions
-
Business3 years agoMarijuana companies suing US attorney general in federal prohibition challenge
-
Business3 years agoLegal Marijuana Handed A Nothing Burger From NY State
-
Business3 years agoCan Cannabis Help Seasonal Depression
-
Blogs3 years agoCannabis Art Is Flourishing On Etsy
