Business
Is Human Trafficking Really Fueling the Cannabis Industry? – The Story Behind the Flashy Headline
Is Human Trafficking really fueling the Cannabis Industry?
NBC recently released a story claiming that “Human Trafficking is Fueling the Legal Cannabis Industry”…so I decided to fact check them!
Well, I won’t necessarily Fact Check them, but rather analyze their claims and see whether or not they are stretching the narrative to fit their alarmist views on cannabis.
Also, if you’re thinking “cannabis” and “human trafficking”, an idea of a Latin American migrant comes to mind…well, you’d be wrong in that assessment.
Before we get to the story, I would like to talk about why I’m covering this topic. Firstly, I have been aware of the horrors of human trafficking for over fifteen years. My partner – who’s a psychoanalyst – treated trafficked victims when she started out.
I worked on their campaigns to raise money and it was then when I learned that Human Trafficking is the second largest illicit market in the world trailing only after drug trafficking.
This is one of the reasons why I am so staunchly in favor of legalizing all drugs! If we could use the same resources we spend on prohibiting drugs to actually stopping human trafficking – the world would be a better place. If we could use the legal drug trade to help fuel this endeavor – we’re winning as a global society!
The sad truth however is that those who have the means to “buy people”, whether as illegal workers or for sex trafficking – they tend to enjoy the fact that law enforcement chooses to go after people who at the very most “harm themselves” instead of them.
“About 10,000 children a year suffer the horrors of commercial sexual exploitation in the United States. Each victim on average is forced to have sex more than five times a day.
Yet the buyers who fuel the child sex trade are seldom held accountable. Most just blend back into their families, jobs and neighborhoods. Until the next time. – Source: USA TODAY”
That’s only in the US. Around the world it’s closer to 1,000,000 children per year who are being trafficked and this only seems to be increasing.
“Despite 20 years of efforts, the sexual exploitation of children in travel and tourism has expanded across the globe and outpaced every attempt to respond at the international and national level… As a result, the risks of child sexual exploitation are increasing.”
— The Global Study on Sexual Exploitation of Children in Travel and Tourism, 2016.
Yet this is child trafficking. Then there’s “Labor trafficking” which is a whole other story. In fact, this is what the NBC story about the illegal marijuana grow facilities were about.
The NBC Human Trafficking Angle
In the video, you see a convoy of police decent on an illegal cannabis grow site in California. You can see some of the illegal workers try to run away but eventually are caught by law enforcement. The site, housing several illegal grow-houses has over a thousand pounds of processed weed, and thousands of plants growing out in the desert – utilizing illegal growing methods.
According to one lieutenant, “70% of the cannabis found in dispensaries come from illegal grows like this”, claiming that the industry doesn’t produce enough. This of course is emphatically incorrect as California actually grew too much weed in 2019 according to certain reports. The same is true in places like Oregon.
In fact, the story back then was that the excess weed of California was being shipped to prohibition states – which were 100% likely.
Nonetheless, the illegal Chinese workers couldn’t speak a word of English, despite being from New York originally. These people were “trafficked” according to NBC, but it wasn’t in the same vein as the initial stories I spoke about.
On the contrary, these people came to “work off their debt” for getting shipped to the US. Thus, they were technically trafficked into the US – but lived in New York up until they were offered the opportunity to work off their debt at the “illegal Chinese cannabis farm”.
This is important, because we’re always led to believe that it’s the “cartel” that’s responsible for all the illegal grows in the US, however, here there’s clear evidence that the Chinese mafias are also banking on the federal policy against cannabis.
The people who worked on these fields were only charged with a misdemeanor due to California laws, and the people who originally ran the whole operations – were also charged with a misdemeanor.
Presumably the cannabis would be sent to the police labs for some processing and potentially they all would be destroyed later.
Nonetheless, we can clearly see some “labor trafficking” happening here, but it’s not as horrific as the true face of human trafficking.
The Sheer Scope of Human Trafficking
According to SafeHorizon.org;
- 24.9 million people are victims of forced labor. (ILO, 2017)
- 16 million people are trafficked for forced labor in the private economy. (Private economy includes: private individuals, groups, or companies in all sectors except the commercial sex industry). (ILO, 2017)
- 4.8 million people are trafficked for forced sexual exploitation. (ILO, 2017)
- 4.1 million people are trafficked for forced labor in state-imposed forced labor.It is estimated that 20.9 million people are trafficked worldwide. (ILO, 2017)
- Women and girls are disproportionately affected by human trafficking, accounting for 71% of all victims. (ILO, 2017)
And these are simply estimates, the actual cases could be much higher.
The question is, how much is Human trafficking worth on in a dollar amount?
According to This Forbes Article;
The motive of traffickers—regardless of the type of human trafficking they are engaged in—is clear: money! Annually, the business of human trafficking globally generates an estimated $150 billion in profits according to the ILO.
According to Polaris (the nonprofit organization that runs the national human trafficking hotline in the United States and which also boycotted the White House Summit), examples for private sector involvement in human trafficking are abundant: traffickers use banks to deposit and launder their earnings; they use planes, buses and taxi services to transport their victims; they book hotel rooms integral also to sex trafficking; and, they are active users of social media platforms to recruit and advertise the services of their victims.
“Human trafficking is a $150 billion a year global industry and can’t be fully addressed without businesses taking active and effective measures to reduce the potential for exploitation within their own systems.”
$150 billion is a lot, and the illicit drug trade is about twice that. But what would happen if we put aside our ideas that drug should be illegal, and made all drug consumption legal globally.
What would happen if we could take that $270 billion annually generated from the illicit drug market, and used it to track down human traffickers? What would happen if we used law enforcement resources to actively pursuit human traffickers?
Do you think we’d be able to stop (or at very least slow down) the horrific illicit marketplace of human trafficking?
What would happen if human trafficking became the #1 priority?
Well, currently the US is spending about $10.6 billion on fighting illicit drugs coming into the country, about $5.5 billion on “interdiction”, and $1.25 billion on international efforts.
How much do you think the US government spends on fighting human trafficking? 1-billion? 2- billion?
Here’s a snippet from The Department of Justice;
The Department of Justice today announced it has awarded nearly $101 million, through the department’s Office of Justice Programs (OJP) in funding to combat human trafficking and provide vital services to trafficking victims throughout the United States.
“The scourge of human trafficking is the modern-day equivalent of slavery, brutally depriving victims of basic human rights and essential physical needs as it erodes their sense of dignity and self-worth,” said Attorney General William P. Barr. “The Department of Justice is relentless in its fight against the perpetrators of these heinous crimes. Working with state and local law enforcement and community victim service providers, we will continue to bring these criminals to justice and deliver critical aid to survivors.”
The Office for Victims of Crime (OVC) awarded over $97.4 million to state, local and tribal jurisdictions, service providers and task forces all over the country, while OJP’s National Institute of Justice awarded the remaining $3.5 million to support research and evaluation on human trafficking.
“Human trafficking is a massive global enterprise with roots in cities and communities here in America and across the world,” said OJP Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Katharine T. Sullivan. “The Office of Justice Programs is using all the resources at its disposal to help our state, local and tribal partners uncover and eradicate trafficking operations and help victims open the door to a new life.”
That’s right, the DOJ has NEARLY 101 million compared to the Nearly $17-billion being spent on trying to keep people from doing drugs.
Of course, there are some overlap in the two illicit industries, but can you honestly say it’s more important to stop people from doing drugs than it is to stop children being sex-trafficked and raped by hundreds of people each month?
To remind you of the reality of some of these Sex Trafficked people; This comes from the USA TODAY article from before;
This project began with a question: Who buys a 15-year-old child for sex?
The answer: Many otherwise ordinary men. They could be your co-worker, doctor, pastor or spouse.
“They’re in all walks of life,” a 17-year-old survivor from the Midwest, trafficked when she was 15, said about the more than 150 men who purchased her in a month. “Some could be upstanding people in the community. It was mostly people in their 40s, living in the suburbs, who were coming to get the stuff they were missing.” – SOURCE
Do you understand my Zeal now?
I have been vocal about absolute drug legalization for almost two decades now. Every opportunity I have, I write about ending the policies that enslave us. Yet I hardly ever get the opportunity to show people what we as a society permit by keeping drugs illegal.
We are spending pennies on trying to stop children from being trafficked and violently raped by the lowest scum of the earth, all in the name of “saving the children” from drugs.
We’re not even spending remotely the same as we are in combating drugs, and all that we’re achieving is protecting the human traffickers and their clients from law enforcement buy gobbling up all police resources over an ounce in some kid’s back pocket.
Whenever I see fat bellied police officers smile over their 3-pound bust making the streets “safer” for the children, I’m reminded of every sex trafficker that was able to sell an innocent child to a monster for profit and how that fat bellied pig went after the lesser of the crimes.
“I’m just doing my job,” some cops might say, but out of principle – your complacency is what keeps the oppression alive and well. Also, the Nazi’s were just doing their jobs but the Nuremberg trials didn’t see that as a legitimate excuse for the atrocities committed in the name of authority.
The Drug was is a smoke screen designed to shield human traffickers from the full force of law enforcement. By going after non-crimes, we’re allowing these evil individuals to continue expanding their business making roughly half of what the whole illicit drug trade makes per year.
That is INSANE!
So to answer the question; “Is Human Trafficking fueling the cannabis industry?”
No NBC – it’s not. However, Drug Prohibition is certainly the perfect smokescreen for true evil to reign unchallenged. The White House talks a big game about protecting “the vulnerable” as they even stated in their National Action Plan that they aim to protect the vulnerable, yet continue to resist any notion of ending the War on Drugs.
Perhaps it’s time we as a global society get our priorities straight. Is drug prohibition really more important than human trafficking?
Business
EU Pressure Builds on Google as Regulators Face Calls for Massive Fine Over Search Practices
A growing coalition of European industry groups is intensifying pressure on regulators to take decisive action against Google over allegations of unfair search practices that could reshape competition rules across the region’s digital economy.
Investigation Under Digital Markets Act Gains Momentum
The case is being examined by the European Commission under the European Union’s landmark Digital Markets Act (DMA), introduced to curb the dominance of major technology platforms and ensure fair competition.
Launched in March 2024, the investigation focuses on whether Google has been prioritising its own services in search results, potentially disadvantaging rival businesses that rely on online visibility to reach customers.
Industry Groups Demand Swift Action
Several prominent European organizations have jointly urged regulators to conclude the probe without further delay. They argue that prolonged investigations allow alleged anti-competitive practices to continue, putting European companies—especially startups—at a disadvantage.
Signatories include the European Publishers Council, the European Magazine Media Association, the European Tech Alliance, and EU Travel Tech.
In a joint statement, these groups warned that delays in enforcement are affecting innovation, profitability, and growth prospects for regional businesses competing in digital markets.
Google Denies Allegations
Google has rejected claims of bias, stating that its search algorithms are designed to deliver the most relevant and useful results to users. The company has also proposed adjustments to address regulatory concerns.
However, critics argue that these changes are insufficient and fail to address the core issue of market dominance.
Potential Billion-Euro Penalties
If found in violation of the DMA, Google could face significant financial penalties. Under EU rules, fines can reach a substantial percentage of a company’s global turnover, potentially amounting to billions of euros.
Regulators may also impose corrective measures requiring changes to business practices, which could have long-term implications for how digital platforms operate in Europe.
Wider Implications for Big Tech
The case highlights ongoing tensions between European regulators and major U.S. technology firms. In recent years, the EU has taken a more aggressive stance in enforcing competition laws, aiming to create a level playing field for local businesses.
A final ruling against Google could set a major precedent, influencing future enforcement actions and shaping the regulatory landscape for global tech companies operating within Europe.
As scrutiny intensifies, the outcome of the investigation is expected to play a critical role in defining the future of digital competition across the European Union.
AI & Technology
Amazon Faces Potential Criminal Trial in Italy Over €1.2 Billion Tax Evasion Allegations
Milan: U.S. tech giant Amazon is facing the prospect of a major legal showdown in Italy, after prosecutors in Milan formally requested a court to move forward with criminal proceedings over alleged tax evasion totaling approximately ₹12,500 crore (€1.2 billion).
The case targets Amazon’s European division along with four senior executives, marking one of the most significant tax-related investigations involving a global e-commerce platform in Europe.
Trial Push Despite Multi-Million Euro Settlement
The move comes even after Amazon reached a financial settlement with Italian tax authorities in December, agreeing to pay around ₹5,500 crore (€527 million), including interest, to resolve part of the dispute.
Typically, such settlements lead to the closure of criminal investigations. However, Milan prosecutors have opted to proceed, signaling a tougher stance on alleged corporate tax violations.
A preliminary hearing is expected in the coming months, where a judge will decide whether to formally indict the company and its executives or dismiss the case.
Allegations of VAT Evasion Through Marketplace Sellers
At the center of the investigation are claims that Amazon’s platform enabled non-European Union sellers to avoid paying value-added tax (VAT) on goods sold to Italian consumers between 2019 and 2021.
Prosecutors allege that the company’s marketplace structure allowed thousands of foreign vendors—many reportedly based in China—to operate without fully disclosing their identities or tax obligations. This, authorities argue, led to substantial VAT losses for the Italian government.
Under Italian law, online platforms facilitating sales can be held partially liable if third-party sellers fail to comply with tax requirements, a key point in the prosecution’s case.
Italian Government Named as Affected Party
In their filing, prosecutors identified Italy’s Economy Ministry as the injured party, citing significant financial damage resulting from the alleged tax evasion.
Legal experts say the outcome of the case could have wide-ranging implications across the European Union, where VAT systems are harmonized and similar compliance rules apply to digital marketplaces.
Multiple Investigations Add to Pressure
The VAT probe is just one of several legal challenges facing Amazon in Italy. The European Public Prosecutor’s Office is reportedly examining additional tax-related issues covering more recent years.
Meanwhile, Milan authorities are pursuing separate investigations into alleged customs fraud linked to imports from China and whether Amazon maintained an undeclared “permanent establishment” in Italy—potentially exposing it to higher tax liabilities.
In a separate regulatory action, Italy’s data protection authority recently ordered an Amazon unit to stop using personal data from over 1,800 employees at a warehouse near Rome.
Amazon Denies Allegations
Amazon has consistently denied wrongdoing and indicated it will strongly contest the allegations in court if the case proceeds. The company has also warned that prolonged legal uncertainty could impact investor confidence and Italy’s appeal as a destination for international business.
Broader Impact on Europe’s Digital Economy
If the case moves to trial, it could become a landmark moment for the regulation of global e-commerce platforms in Europe. Governments across the region are increasingly scrutinizing how digital marketplaces handle tax compliance, especially in cross-border transactions.
With online retail continuing to expand, regulators are under mounting pressure to ensure that multinational platforms and third-party sellers adhere to the same tax rules as traditional businesses.
Aviation
IndiGo Crisis Exposes Risks of Monopoly: What If Telecom or E-commerce Collapses Next?
Airports across India witnessed scenes of distress and confusion as thousands of passengers were stranded due to IndiGo’s massive flight disruptions. Families with medical emergencies, funerals, and personal crises were left helpless as the airline cancelled hundreds of flights without adequate communication or support.
Passengers described desperate situations — a mother pleading for sanitary pads for her daughter, a woman unable to transport her husband’s coffin, and others stranded while trying to reach family funerals or hospitals. “It was like a lockdown at the airport,” one passenger said, describing the panic that unfolded as IndiGo’s mismanagement crippled operations nationwide.
Root Cause: IndiGo’s Market Monopoly
The turmoil, industry experts argue, stems from IndiGo’s monopolistic control over India’s domestic aviation market. The airline operates nearly 2,100 flights daily and holds around 60% market share — meaning every second plane flying within India belongs to IndiGo.
This dominance has given the company unparalleled influence. When IndiGo falters, the entire aviation system suffers. Passengers are left with few alternatives, as other airlines lack capacity to absorb stranded travellers. The result: skyrocketing ticket prices, chaos at terminals, and total dependence on a single private operator.
Aviation pioneer Captain G.R. Gopinath, founder of Air Deccan, criticised the government’s inaction, noting that on some routes, IndiGo’s economy fares surged to ₹1 lakh. He compared the situation to a hostage crisis, writing that the airline “held the system ransom” and forced regulators to defer new safety rules meant to protect pilots and passengers.
Government Intervention and Regulatory Weakness
The crisis erupted after IndiGo failed to comply with the Flight Duty Time Limitations (FDTL) — rules introduced by the DGCA in January 2024 requiring adequate rest for pilots. Despite having nearly two years to adapt, IndiGo blamed the rule for operational disruptions, citing a shortage of pilots.
Under mounting public pressure, the government stepped in, temporarily relaxing FDTL norms and capping airfare hikes. Officials claimed the move was to protect passengers, but analysts say it exposed the state’s vulnerability to corporate monopolies. “The government had no option but to yield,” said one aviation policy expert, pointing out that ignoring safety regulations for short-term relief could have long-term consequences.
The crisis also rekindled memories of the June 2025 Air India crash near London, which claimed over 240 lives. Experts warn that compromising pilot rest and safety standards to maintain flight schedules could risk another tragedy.
If Telecom Giants Fail: A National Paralysis
The article raises a troubling question — what if a similar crisis struck the telecom sector, where Jio and Airtel together control nearly 80% of subscribers and serve over 780 million users?
If both networks failed simultaneously, the repercussions would be catastrophic. Internet shutdowns would halt UPI transactions, online banking, OTP verifications, video calls, OTT streaming, and emergency communications. Critical services such as airports, hospitals, stock exchanges, and small businesses — many of which rely on WhatsApp and digital payments — would come to a standstill.
In essence, a telecom breakdown could paralyse India’s digital economy, exposing the nation’s dependence on a duopoly.
E-commerce Monopoly: Another Fragile Ecosystem
The same risk looms over the e-commerce sector, where Amazon and Flipkart dominate nearly 80% of the market. A disruption similar to IndiGo’s could cripple daily life — halting delivery of groceries, medicines, and essential goods, freezing refunds and customer support, and leaving small sellers without platforms to trade.
Local retailers, freed from competition, might exploit shortages by inflating prices. Such a scenario underscores the perils of market centralisation in sectors critical to everyday living.
A Wake-Up Call for Regulators
The IndiGo crisis, analysts say, is a warning shot for policymakers and regulators. A single company’s operational failure exposed systemic weaknesses in India’s infrastructure and consumer protection mechanisms.
As the aviation regulator DGCA investigates and IndiGo works to restore normalcy, the broader lesson remains clear: unchecked monopoly power in any essential service — whether air travel, telecom, or e-commerce — poses a direct threat to economic stability and citizen welfare.
Without stronger competition laws, redundancy frameworks, and regulatory oversight, India risks repeating this crisis across multiple sectors — each time with millions of citizens paying the price.
-
Business3 years agoPot Odor Does Not Justify Probable Cause for Vehicle Searches, Minnesota Court Affirms
-
Business3 years agoNew Mexico cannabis operator fined, loses license for alleged BioTrack fraud
-
Business3 years agoAlabama to make another attempt Dec. 1 to award medical cannabis licenses
-
Business3 years agoWashington State Pays Out $9.4 Million in Refunds Relating to Drug Convictions
-
Business3 years agoMarijuana companies suing US attorney general in federal prohibition challenge
-
Business3 years agoLegal Marijuana Handed A Nothing Burger From NY State
-
Business3 years agoCan Cannabis Help Seasonal Depression
-
Blogs3 years agoCannabis Art Is Flourishing On Etsy
