Government
Could an Oregon lawsuit legalize interstate marijuana commerce before Congress?
If not Congress, what about the courts?
A not-too-distant future in which marijuana companies can ship products across state lines – if not “legally,” at least without interference from federal or state authorities – is possible if a recently filed lawsuit challenging Oregon state law is successful, legal analysts told MJBizDaily.
Such an outcome might require legal challenges in other states, however.
Also, it would likely require finding other states – and businesses there – willing to accept out-of-state marijuana.
In this way, legalizing interstate commerce via the courts, ahead of outright federal legalization, is a long shot, a sort of Rube Goldberg machine of interdependent hypotheticals that all must fall into place before a single pound is shipped.
But best of all for a marijuana industry tired of delayed federal reform and struggling with tumbling wholesale prices, neither Congress nor the president would have to do anything.
‘No differently than any other product’
On Nov. 17, a licensed Oregon distribution company, Jefferson Packing House, filed suit against Oregon Gov. Kate Brown and other state officials.
The suit seeks to overturn a section of Oregon law that prohibits state-licensed operators from shipping marijuana across state lines, arguing that such a prohibition is unconstitutional.
Like some other legacy states in the West, Oregon appears amenable to the idea of supplying other states with sun-grown cannabis.
In 2019, Oregon’s governor signed into law legislation that would lift that prohibition if there are significant changes to federal law, including the legalization of interstate commerce.
But Jefferson Packing House’s lawsuit seeks to get ahead of that and eliminate the restriction on exports – even if there is no action at the federal level.
The suit uses the same argument that helped overturn a state residency requirement for Maine medical marijuana operators earlier this year.
In that case, U.S. District Judge Nancy Torresen of the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Maine’s law was a violation of the U.S. Constitution’s dormant commerce clause.
The law, she wrote, “explicitly discriminates against residents of other states and Maine cannot show a legitimate local purpose for the requirement.”
In a Nov. 14 letter to Gov. Brown and other state officials, lawyers for Jefferson Packing House argued that under the dormant commerce clause, states “are prohibited from enacting laws regulating interstate commerce, because it is the exclusive purview of Congress.”
Neither Brown’s office, the Oregon state attorney general nor state cannabis officials responded to MJBizDaily requests for comment.
Citing the Maine case, the Jefferson Packing House lawyers wrote in their letter that “we believe it is likely that a federal court will treat marijuana like hazelnuts and invalidate state laws prohibiting the export of marijuana notwithstanding the fact that it is illegal under federal law.”
“Federal courts are signaling that they’re not going to treat cannabis differently than any other product,” one of the attorneys, Andrew DeWeese, told MJBizDaily in an interview.
‘See what the feds do’
However, even if a judge agrees, and if the ruling isn’t appealed – or, if it is, if the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, or, potentially, the U.S. Supreme Court, upholds the ruling – a few more hurdles would need to be cleared.
And that could take time.
For starters, regulators in both Oregon and another state would have to create a “regulatory pathway” for licensed companies to start shipping marijuana.
If they did not do so willingly, that potential Supreme Court ruling could strike down prohibitions, though it’s less clear if such a decision would compel other states to write the necessary regulations.
It’s unclear if they would be required to do so if the export prohibition is struck down or if they would need to be compelled to do so via more legal action.
It’s also unclear how welcoming existing marijuana businesses in the target state would be to new competition.
At that point, “someone with real guts will need to say, ‘OK, I’m sending 100 pounds of weed to another state,’” DeWeese said. “And then we’ll have to see what the feds do.”
It’s a lot of “ifs.” But there’s precedent.
Both the 1st Circuit as well as lower federal courts, in response to a Michigan man’s challenge of residency requirements in equity programs, have agreed that the dormant commerce clause applies to cannabis.
As others, including Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, have pointed out, interstate trade in cannabis currently exists – although it is entirely illegal – and which Congress currently “regulates” via the Controlled Substances Act.
If the Jefferson Packing House challenge were to be greeted by a similar ruling at the 9th Circuit – which oversees much of the West Coast – and then again later at the Supreme Court, where Thomas wrote in a 2021 opinion that “prohibition on intrastate use or cultivation of marijuana may no longer be necessary or proper to support the Federal Government’s piecemeal approach” toward cannabis, other states’ bans on exports could later be overturned.
Skeptics who point out that the U.S. Department of Justice might take exception to a few states testing the federal government’s appetite to crack down on marijuana point out that the existing $33 billion MJ industry also violates U.S. law.
Shipping more marijuana across state lines, only this time with state licenses, and entering the transactions into track-and-trace systems is simply another violation of another federal statute, that, until now, has been seen as an ultimately arbitrary red line.
In any event, as attorney DeWeese stated, with outdoor craft farmers known for producing high-quality product suffering through an extended period of plummeting prices, “we need this in Oregon.”
“Our industry in Oregon needs help,” he added, “and this is an incremental step that can be taken that will hopefully convince some other people to take action, too.”
‘Going to win’
DeWeese’s strategy follows an argument that prominent legal scholars have been making for years.
One of them, Vanderbilt University law professor Robert Mikos, believes “they have a very good case.”
“It’s a straightforward argument,” Mikos told MJBizDaily. “You have a state law that plainly burdens interstate commerce.
“There’s no question about it: Oregon has said that the companies licensed in Oregon can’t ship product out of state. There’s no ambiguity there.”
“The only reason we have to doubt any of this at all, whether the dormant commerce clause applies to this market, is because it’s marijuana,” he said, noting that four federal courts have nonetheless ruled that the commerce clause does apply to cannabis.
“Once you accept that, the outcome is obvious,” he added. “The company is going to win, and this ban on the export of cannabis is going to get struck down.”
At the same time, he warned, the status quo will not change quickly.
More lawsuits, such as challenges forcing other states to open their markets to out-of-state cannabis, might follow.
And even if the markets are open to out-of-state-product, that product would need to be competitive.
That cannabis would also be subject to whatever regulations that state would impose. It could be that packaging and labeling requirements would make importing marijuana impractical.
Importantly, Mikos does not expect federal interference from the Justice Department.
“There’s no appetite in the federal government to prosecute these kinds of cases,” he said.
“As long as you are willing to comply with valid state laws – like don’t sell to minors, and package in the way the state wants you to package your product – as long as you are willing to do that, I don’t think the DOJ is going to be hostile to this.
“It’ll be expensive and time-consuming, so things aren’t going to change overnight. Even if we got a ruling tomorrow from the district court saying Oregon’s ban is unconstitutional, it’ll take some time to work out.”
Note of caution
Legal interstate trade would be welcome news to Mike Getlin, who owns and operates Old Apple Farm, a cannabis cultivation operation in Oregon City.
“It would clearly be a huge benefit to almost all Oregon cannabis business,” said Getlin, who is also the founder and president of the Oregon Industry Progress Association.
Getlin and his colleagues have been focused on the plight of cultivators ever since the market for outdoor flower in the state crashed under the weight of epic oversupply, as Oregon’s relatively low costs and permissive rules encouraged cultivators to grow more than they could sell.
Were barriers to shipping to fall, “I don’t think you’ll have any trouble finding someone” willing to test the waters, he said.
“Thousands of people have been shipping weed to the East Coast for 50 years.”
However, partly because of the interest, Getlin is more circumspect and injects a note of caution.
“I’m not sure that it’s necessarily the one solution that a lot of people think it might be,” he said.
Interstate commerce doesn’t fix problems with taxation, with Section 280E of the tax code, or with cannabis businesses unable to claim normal bankruptcy protections or take advantage of tax breaks offered to other agricultural operations, Getlin observed.
And oversupply is not just an Oregon problem.
“We’re seeing a lot of the same pricing realities play out in markets across the country as they mature,” Getlin said.
“While I think it’s a critical step – and one that Oregon businesses have been hoping and preparing for for the better part of a decade now – I think it’s one more step in the right direction and not a solution for all our woes.”
And lawsuits that end up at the Supreme Court are measured in years – time that not every struggling business in the cannabis industry has to spare.
“The trouble is, there’s a lot of good people with good businesses who are going to fail while the government moves at its usual slow pace.”
Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/could-oregon-lawsuit-legalize-interstate-marijuana-commerce-before-congress/
The Sambhal district administration has cancelled four government land leases issued more than three decades ago after an official investigation found alleged irregularities in the classification and allotment of Ganga river land.
The action follows an inquiry that concluded approximately 31 bigha of land in Surpur village of Gunnour tehsil was leased after its original revenue classification was allegedly altered, allowing land categorized as riverbed to be treated as agricultural property.
Inquiry Reveals Alleged Record Manipulation
The decision was taken by the Additional District Magistrate (ADM) based on an investigation conducted by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM), Gunnour.
Officials found that while the current revenue records listed the land as transferable agricultural property, older consolidation documents identified it as Category-6(1) submerged river land, making it ineligible for such allotments.
Following the findings, the administration ordered the cancellation of all four leases and directed revenue officials to restore the land’s original classification in official records.
Leases Issued in 1991 Declared Invalid
According to the inquiry, the disputed leases were granted on November 17, 1991, in the names of Shrinivas, Sher Singh, Shakuntala, residents of Surpur village, and Prakash Chandra of Patei Kayasth village.
Authorities stated that the allotments did not comply with the provisions of Section 128 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, prompting their cancellation.
Officials said corrective entries are now being made in the revenue records to reflect the land’s original legal status.
Wider Probe Into Ganga Riverbank Land Allotments
The latest action is part of a broader investigation into alleged irregularities involving government land located along the Ganga riverbank in Sambhal district.
Earlier investigations uncovered suspected illegal allotments involving nearly 845 bigha of government land in Sukhailla village under Gram Panchayat Asadpur, where 162 leases are also under scrutiny.
Investigators believe a similar pattern may have been followed in multiple cases, with riverbed land allegedly reclassified as agricultural land before being leased to individuals.
Field inspections reportedly found that much of the land was unsuitable for conventional farming and was instead being used for activities such as sand mining.
Government Land Worth ₹18 Crore Under Review
District officials estimate that approximately 850 bigha (around 71.5 hectares) of government land, valued at nearly ₹18 crore, is currently under investigation.
Authorities have launched a comprehensive review of historical land leases issued across villages situated along the Ganga river in the Rajpura, Gunnour, and Junawai blocks.
The objective is to determine which allotments were made legally and identify cases where land records may have been manipulated.
Officials’ Role Also Being Examined
The investigation has also raised questions about the possible involvement or negligence of officials from the revenue and consolidation departments.
District authorities said responsibility will be fixed after the inquiry is completed, and legal or departmental action will be taken against anyone found to have violated land allotment rules.
Officials indicated that the ongoing review could reveal additional cases involving unauthorized occupation or irregular leasing of government land.
The administration has reiterated its commitment to restoring government property and ensuring transparency in land management across the district.
The National Testing Agency (NTA) has issued a warning to NEET UG 2026 candidates and their parents against submitting fake, altered, or AI-generated OMR sheets while raising objections related to examination results.
The examination authority said that candidates found providing fabricated documents or misleading information during the verification process could face legal consequences.
The warning comes after several students approached the agency with complaints alleging discrepancies between their expected scores and the marks published in the final results.
NTA Finds Suspicious Documents During Verification
According to the NTA, some candidates submitted OMR sheets while requesting score verification, but officials found that certain documents appeared to be manipulated or artificially generated.
The agency clarified that only original OMR sheets issued during the examination process will be accepted for reviewing complaints.
NTA officials said they are examining all grievances carefully and will consider only verified examination records while deciding on score-related concerns.
Students Raise Questions Over NEET UG Results
After the announcement of NEET UG 2026 results, several candidates reported differences between their estimated marks based on the official answer key and their final scorecards.
Some students claimed that their expected scores were significantly higher than the marks awarded in the results.
In some reported cases, candidates alleged that uploaded OMR sheets did not match their original answer sheets or that the displayed scores were inconsistent with their calculations.
The complaints prompted several students and parents to seek clarification and request a detailed review of the evaluation process.
AI-Generated Fake Records Create New Challenge
The NTA has highlighted the growing misuse of artificial intelligence tools to create fake examination documents.
Officials said digitally altered OMR sheets and fabricated records could create difficulties in identifying genuine grievances and may affect the integrity of the complaint resolution system.
The agency advised candidates to avoid using unofficial documents or modified materials while submitting objections.
Candidates found involved in producing false evidence may face action under applicable laws, the NTA warned.
NEET UG 2026 Conducted Again After Paper Leak Allegations
The NEET UG 2026 examination process faced controversy after allegations of a paper leak led authorities to cancel the original exam held on May 3.
A re-examination was conducted on June 21 for affected candidates, following which results were announced on July 16.
After the controversy, the government announced plans to move future NEET UG examinations from the traditional pen-and-paper format to a computer-based testing (CBT) system.
Verification Process Continues
The NTA said the review of complaints submitted by candidates is still underway and further decisions will be taken after completing the verification of all documents.
The agency has urged students to rely only on official communication channels and submit genuine records while seeking clarification about their results.
The Goa government has initiated a detailed investigation into alleged irregularities in Public Works Department (PWD) tenders worth nearly ₹1,000 crore, following complaints of document manipulation and misuse of contractor eligibility credentials.
The probe focuses on claims that certain construction firms may have secured high-value infrastructure contracts by submitting falsified or altered work completion certificates to qualify for top contractor categories.
Allegations of Fake Experience Certificates in Tender Bids
According to complaints filed by engineers and contractors, several companies allegedly used questionable documentation to obtain Class IAA contractor status, a designation that allows participation in large-scale government infrastructure projects.
Investigators are examining whether manipulated work completion certificates were used to falsely demonstrate prior project experience, thereby inflating eligibility during the tender evaluation process.
One of the key concerns involves references to infrastructure projects executed under Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Limited, including the “Mudi Tank Filling Scheme.” Authorities are verifying claims that duplicate or inconsistent completion certificates may have been issued for the same project.
JV Structure Alteration Under Scrutiny
Officials are also investigating alleged changes in joint venture (JV) agreements submitted during tender applications. In one case under review, a 2019 JV reportedly listed Amrita Constructions Private Limited as the lead partner, with another firm as a supporting entity.
However, documents submitted to Goa PWD allegedly reversed these roles, naming Bagkiya Constructions as the lead partner. This change is suspected to have significantly enhanced the company’s technical eligibility and past performance record.
Authorities believe such alterations may have allowed firms to qualify for contracts they would otherwise not have been eligible for under standard procurement norms.
Allegations Linked to Karnataka Project Documentation
Another complaint under review concerns the “Akka Mahadevi Memorial Project” in Shivamogga, Karnataka, valued at over ₹51 crore. It is alleged that the project, executed in phases, was incorrectly represented as a single completed contract to meet eligibility requirements for higher-value tenders.
Investigators are verifying whether such representations were used to gain unfair advantage in experience-based qualification criteria.
Government Launches Comprehensive Inquiry
Following the emergence of these allegations, the Goa government has ordered a preliminary inquiry into all related contracts, approvals, and supporting documentation.
Officials have stated that every stage of the tendering process—including eligibility checks, certificate validation, and contract award decisions—will be examined in detail.
If irregularities are established, possible actions may include contract cancellation, blacklisting of firms, recovery of funds, and legal proceedings against those involved in submitting false documentation.
Concerns Over Procurement Transparency
The case has raised broader concerns about transparency and verification systems in public infrastructure procurement. Experts point out that reliance on manual documentation without robust digital verification increases the risk of fraud in large-scale government contracting.
Transparency advocates have called for stronger auditing systems, centralized contractor databases, and real-time verification of project credentials to prevent misuse of public tender processes.
Probe Continues
Authorities have confirmed that the investigation is ongoing and a detailed report will be prepared after reviewing all evidence and documentation. Further action will be taken based on the findings in accordance with applicable laws and procurement rules.
-
Business3 years agoPot Odor Does Not Justify Probable Cause for Vehicle Searches, Minnesota Court Affirms
-
Business3 years agoNew Mexico cannabis operator fined, loses license for alleged BioTrack fraud
-
Business3 years agoAlabama to make another attempt Dec. 1 to award medical cannabis licenses
-
Business3 years agoWashington State Pays Out $9.4 Million in Refunds Relating to Drug Convictions
-
Business3 years agoMarijuana companies suing US attorney general in federal prohibition challenge
-
Business3 years agoLegal Marijuana Handed A Nothing Burger From NY State
-
Business3 years agoCan Cannabis Help Seasonal Depression
-
Blogs3 years agoCannabis Art Is Flourishing On Etsy