Healthcare
Cannabis Can Help Treat Cancer, But Can It Also Prevent It? New 150,000 Person Urology Study Stuns Medical World
Some think cannabis can cure cancer, but what about preventing it altogether?
Urologic cancers are cancers that attack the structures and organs of the female and male urinary tract as well as the male reproductive structures. Urologic cancer is the general term for cancers of the kidney, testicles, bladder, penis, and prostate.
The Cancer Society of America believes that urological cancers make up about 23 percent of all commonly diagnosed cancer. The treatment and diagnosis of urological tumors have greatly improved considerably due to better detection, sophisticated imaging, and the discovery of disease-specific molecular markers.
Urologic cancers (or malignancies of the urinary system ) are suspected of having connections to genetic, lifestyle, environmental, and other factors. Methods for treating and identifying urologic malignancies have gotten better over time, and patients are now given a variety of alternatives based on their needs and goals.
CANNABIS AS A MEDICAL TREATMENT
The Cannabis Sativa L. plant is the most significant source of phytocannabinoids and has been employed as a herbal treatment for generations. The endocannabinoid system (ECS) is made up of endogenous ligands (endocannabinoids), receptors, and metabolizing enzymes. It is crucial for many pathological and physiological processes. In order to influence the onset or spread of diseases, including cancer, synthetic cannabinoids and phytocannabinoids may interact with the elements of the endocannabinoid system or other cellular pathways. Cannabinoids have mostly been used in cancer patients’ palliative care to treat pain, treat nausea, and increase appetite.
Cannabinoids also showed anticancer benefits in a variety of cancer types in multiple cell cultures and animal experiments.
A STUDY ON CANNABIS AND UROLOGICAL CANCER
A recent study which was published by Cancer Medicine looked into the link between the incidence of urological malignancies and cannabis use. Researchers examined the cannabis usage of 151,945 people who had information on cannabis usage in the UK Biobank between 2006 and 2010.
“Crude and maturity level incidence ratios of various urological malignancies were examined in the total cohort and subgroups,” according to the study’s methodology. “For survival analysis, Cox regression was used,” according to the study undertaken by academics from France, the United Kingdom, and China.
For the result of the study, according to the researchers, frequent prior use of marijuana was found to be a strong defensive factor for prostate cancer and renal cell carcinoma in multivariable analysis. Another link was seen between previous cannabis usage and bladder cancer, as well as renal cell carcinoma in women but not in males. The study also discovered no link between testicular cancer and the use of cannabis.
In conclusion of the research, it was stated that there was a link between preexisting cannabis usage and reduced risk of prostate cancer, bladder cancer, and renal cell carcinoma. The inverse relationship between marijuana and both bladder cancer and renal cell carcinoma is found only in females and not found in males.
MEDICAL CANNABIS IN ADVANCED CANCER TREATMENT
According to information released in the journal Cureus, patients who have advanced cancer respond positively to medical marijuana.
Researchers from the Upstate University Hospital in Syracuse, New York, studied the use of marijuana by people with cancer for palliative purposes. All the trial participants were registered in the medical marijuana registry of the state.
In line with previous research, 85% of individuals (the majority) reported improvements in their symptoms after using cannabis, with almost half reporting decreases in discomfort. In line with earlier studies, a sizable portion (45%) of the participants reported reducing their use of opioid painkillers. Less than 4% of subjects reported any negative effects from using medical marijuana products.
The scientists came to a conclusion that “medical cannabis seems to have an essential function in the palliation of symptoms in advanced malignancies with few adverse effects.” Prioritize prospective research that looks into this therapeutic approach.
EFFECTS OF MEDICAL CANNABIS ON CANCER-RELATED PAIN
Opioid analgesics have historically been the principal treatment for cancer-related pain. Ninety-five percent of patients reported treatment success in a recent Cochrane collaborative evaluation of opioids as treatment for cancer pain, which thoroughly evaluated 152 publications with 13,524 patients. However, most patients did not adequately estimate pain reduction. The studies that served as the foundation for the treatment choice were outdated, had small sample sizes, and had negative reaction rates that ranged from 11 to 77%, leading one researcher to conclude that the quality of the findings in support of opioid medications is low. That is likely one of the factors contributing to the majority of oncologists’ perception of opioid treatment as risky and the need for alternative medicines.
Medical cannabis is a promising alternative to opioid-based medications. The research on cannabis, particularly for the treatment of cancer-related pain, is lacking in understanding, and the findings are debatable. The effects of cannabis on cancer-related pain and, sparsely, on other cancer symptoms have been the subject of relatively few randomized clinical trials and even fewer cohorts. As a result, there is only a minimum recommendation for using marijuana to relieve cancer pain. Although these research were randomized clinical experiments, the majority of them had tiny sample sizes, necessitating further research. A more current meta-analysis revealed that Nabiximols had no beneficial effect on cancer pain. However, a recent study found that the majority of cancer patients asked their oncologist for medical cannabis treatment.
Patients typically tolerate the negative effects gotten from these cannabinoids, which are classified as mild to moderate in severity. The most frequent negative effects include sleepiness, xerostomia (dry mouth), vomiting, and nausea. The use of cannabinoids as a treatment for cancer-related pain is usually regarded as harmless. However, drug-to-drug interactions need to be considered. Recent prospective and retrospective investigations found that administering immunotherapy along with medical cannabis treatment resulted in lower response rates.
BOTTOM LINE
Owing to the fact that it is a relatively new phenomenon, more findings or research has to be carried out in regard to the full effect or benefit of cannabis as a treatment for cancer. However, studies are already showing some positives. A recent study on cannabis and urological cancers has shown that rye use of medical cannabis has helped patients alleviate the pain caused by cancer.
Education News
AIIMS Gorakhpur Reservation Controversy: FIR Alleges Fake OBC Certificate Used Despite ₹80 Lakh Income
A major controversy has emerged at AIIMS Gorakhpur after allegations surfaced that reservation benefits were misused to secure a postgraduate medical seat. A criminal case has been registered against former AIIMS Gorakhpur Executive Director Dr. G.K. Pal and his son, Dr. Oro Prakash Pal, over the alleged use of a forged Other Backward Class (OBC) Non-Creamy Layer certificate for admission to an MD course.
The case has triggered widespread debate within medical and administrative circles, raising serious questions about transparency and oversight in admissions to premier medical institutions.
FIR Filed on Court’s Direction
The First Information Report (FIR) was registered at the AIIMS police station following directions from Chief Judicial Magistrate Tvishi Srivastava. According to the complaint, the alleged offence took place on August 30, 2024, when forged documents were purportedly used to obtain an MD seat under the OBC reservation quota.
Sources indicate that the matter was subsequently brought to the attention of the Union Ministry of Health, prompting internal reviews and administrative action.
Alleged Income Far Above Eligibility Threshold
Central to the allegations is the claim that Dr. G.K. Pal and his wife Parvati Pal have a combined annual income exceeding ₹80 lakh. Under existing reservation rules, families with such income levels are not eligible for OBC Non-Creamy Layer benefits.
Following the emergence of the controversy, Dr. Pal was first removed from his position at AIIMS Gorakhpur and later relieved of responsibilities at AIIMS Patna. He is currently posted at JIPMER Puducherry. With the registration of the FIR, officials suggest that further legal and departmental action may follow, depending on the outcome of the investigation.
Complaint Highlights Systemic Concerns
The complaint was filed by Ashutosh Kumar Mishra, a resident of Divyanagar in the Cantonment area. He alleged that the events related to the case occurred between January and September 2024. The complainant argued that misuse of reservation provisions by individuals in senior positions undermines the integrity of public institutions and erodes trust in the medical education system.
The case has reignited concerns over whether verification mechanisms for reservation certificates are robust enough, particularly in high-stakes admissions.
Impact on Medical Community
The allegations have sent shockwaves through the medical fraternity. Experts believe that if the claims are substantiated, the case could prompt a broader review of admission procedures and lead to stricter scrutiny of category certificates across institutions like AIIMS.
Authorities have stated that all relevant documents will be carefully examined before taking further steps. The outcome of the investigation is expected to have far-reaching implications for accountability and compliance in medical admissions.
Questions Await Answers
As the probe continues, several key issues remain unresolved: whether reservation norms were deliberately violated, how verification processes failed, and whether similar cases may surface in the future. For now, the focus remains on the investigation and its potential consequences.
Business
New Mexico cannabis operator fined, loses license for alleged BioTrack fraud
New Mexico regulators fined a cannabis operator nearly $300,000 and revoked its license after the company allegedly created fake reports in the state’s traceability software.
The New Mexico Cannabis Control Division (CCD) accused marijuana manufacturer and retailer Golden Roots of 11 violations, according to Albuquerque Business First.
Golden Roots operates the The Cannabis Revolution Dispensary.
The majority of the violations are related to the Albuquerque company’s improper use of BioTrack, which has been New Mexico’s track-and-trace vendor since 2015.
The CCD alleges Golden Roots reported marijuana production only two months after it had received its vertically integrated license, according to Albuquerque Business First.
Because cannabis takes longer than two months to be cultivated, the CCD was suspicious of the report.
After inspecting the company’s premises, the CCD alleged Golden Roots reported cultivation, transportation and sales in BioTrack but wasn’t able to provide officers who inspected the site evidence that the operator was cultivating cannabis.
In April, the CCD revoked Golden Roots’ license and issued a $10,000 fine, according to the news outlet.
The company requested a hearing, which the regulator scheduled for Sept. 1.
At the hearing, the CCD testified that the company’s dried-cannabis weights in BioTrack were suspicious because they didn’t seem to accurately reflect how much weight marijuana loses as it dries.
Company employees also poorly accounted for why they were making adjustments in the system of up to 24 pounds of cannabis, making comments such as “bad” or “mistake” in the software, Albuquerque Business First reported.
Golden Roots was fined $298,972.05 – the amount regulators allege the company made selling products that weren’t properly accounted for in BioTrack.
The CCD has been cracking down on cannabis operators accused of selling products procured from out-of-state or not grown legally:
- Regulators alleged in August that Albuquerque dispensary Sawmill Sweet Leaf sold out-of-state products and didn’t have a license for extraction.
- Paradise Exotics Distro lost its license in July after regulators alleged the company sold products made in California.
Golden Roots was the first alleged rulebreaker in New Mexico to be asked to pay a large fine.
Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/new-mexico-cannabis-operator-fined-loses-license-for-alleged-biotrack-fraud/
Business
Alabama to make another attempt Dec. 1 to award medical cannabis licenses
Alabama regulators are targeting Dec. 1 to award the first batch of medical cannabis business licenses after the agency’s first two attempts were scrapped because of scoring errors and litigation.
The first licenses will be awarded to individual cultivators, delivery providers, processors, dispensaries and state testing labs, according to the Alabama Medical Cannabis Commission (AMCC).
Then, on Dec. 12, the AMCC will award licenses for vertically integrated operations, a designation set primarily for multistate operators.
Licenses are expected to be handed out 28 days after they have been awarded, so MMJ production could begin in early January, according to the Alabama Daily News.
That means MMJ products could be available for patients around early March, an AMCC spokesperson told the media outlet.
Regulators initially awarded 21 business licenses in June, only to void them after applicants alleged inconsistencies with how the applications were scored.
Then, in August, the state awarded 24 different licenses – 19 went to June recipients – only to reverse themselves again and scratch those licenses after spurned applicants filed lawsuits.
A state judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by Chicago-based MSO Verano Holdings Corp., but another lawsuit is pending.
Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/alabama-plans-to-award-medical-cannabis-licenses-dec-1/
-
Business2 years agoPot Odor Does Not Justify Probable Cause for Vehicle Searches, Minnesota Court Affirms
-
Business2 years agoNew Mexico cannabis operator fined, loses license for alleged BioTrack fraud
-
Business2 years agoAlabama to make another attempt Dec. 1 to award medical cannabis licenses
-
Business2 years agoWashington State Pays Out $9.4 Million in Refunds Relating to Drug Convictions
-
Business2 years agoMarijuana companies suing US attorney general in federal prohibition challenge
-
Business2 years agoLegal Marijuana Handed A Nothing Burger From NY State
-
Business2 years agoCan Cannabis Help Seasonal Depression
-
Blogs3 years agoCannabis Art Is Flourishing On Etsy
