Connect with us

Business

California’s Drug War 2.0 – A Closer Look at the State’s Campaign Against Marijuana Planting (CAMP)

Published

on

A deep dive into the CAMP campaign to elimiate illegal cannabis grows in California

A Closer look at California’s “Drug War 2.0”

California has long been a pioneer when it comes to cannabis. However, this all changed when they “legalized” cannabis for recreational purposes. In fact, their roll out was so dismal, that they are now beginning to ramp up a new form of prohibition, and in fact, utilizing drug war tactics to “ensure” the success of their industry – unfortunately, it’s not working!

In today’s article we’re going to be taking a closer look at how California has managed to ruin a perfectly good system due to bureaucratic nonsense and greed.

This was perfectly highlighted in a recent Reason Article which outlined that California Attorney General – Rob Bonta – boasted about their “recent successes” in eradicating nearly a million “illegal” cannabis plants utilizing a program that was conceived in the height of the drug war.

The enforcement program Bonta refers to is the state’s Campaign Against Marijuana Planting (CAMP). It was founded as part of the war on drugs to try to tackle the many illegal marijuana grow operations across a massive state with huge swathes of undeveloped land.

The data itself is a fascinating look at how little drug legalization means when a state’s regulatory systems are so oppressive that it undermines the legal market. In 1984, CAMP’s first full year of operation, the program was responsible for the eradication of 158,000 marijuana plants. In 2022, after almost 40 years of a drug war and eight years of legalization in the state, that number has grown to 974,000 plants, spread across 449 operations in 26 counties, according to the October 11 announcement from Bonta’s office.

That’s right – under California’s heavily taxed and bureaucratic system, there has been an increase in the number of “illegal cannabis grows” and their failure to make a single dent in the illicit market. In fact, Bonta and his “drug warriors” are going to rebrand the CAMP taskforce into the Eradication and Prevention of Illicit Cannabis taskforce – or EPIC for short.

Bonta’s re-envisioning of this Drug War tool will actually be MORE draconian than it was under the prohibition rhetoric. In fact, he wants to modernize the drug war and rebrand it so him and his “eradicators” can continue to spend government money on hunting the “evils” of marijuana. Of course, he’s not outright saying “cannabis is bad”, but rather that the “illegal grows” are bad.

While it’s true that many of these illegal grows are in fact dangerous to both wildlife and even people, it didn’t swell to what it was just because. The true reason why the black market is thriving in California is due to their horrendous cannabis policies.

The fact of the matter is that Bonta will only take the old drug war rhetoric and tactics, rebrand it and continue on its endless war to stop the plant and keep money flowing into the pockets of the government. However, it will achieve absolutely nothing. They could eradicate 10 million plants and there will always be another illicit grow somewhere in the large swaths of undeveloped land in California.

If Drug Warrioring isn’t working – what will?

If you’re going to beat the Cartels or illicit grow operations, you need to remove their incentive. When the risk of getting caught outweighs the perceived benefits – these operations will cease to exist. The only way to do this is to lower taxes and the threshold for individuals to participate in the market.

Currently you need to have deep pockets to be able break into the Californian cannabis market and as a result, illegal grows make a killing. They risk a lot for growing on public land, however, they also make an insane amount of money.

In fact, many people continue to purchase on the Black Market simply because it’s cheaper. And it’s only cheaper because they don’t have to pay these insane tariffs and taxes.

So how can one cut off the supply?

Make it incredibly simple to get in on the weed game. I have written extensively on how this could be done where you create a 2-tier cannabis industry. The first tier will be designated to small cannabis operations where they can grow and sell cannabis in a “farmer’s market” type set up.

The overall cost for a license should be roughly $1,000 per year and should cover up to $1,000,000 annually in profits. Once this threshold is met, the company should have to upgrade to a “corporate license” where they would have other opportunities like being able to sell in major retailers like Walmart and the likes.

The Tier-1 licenses will be directed to entrepreneurs who will create jobs locally and will not be required a lot of testing. This is more of a peer-to-peer system where small markets can pop up, people can buy and sell their weed (and products), which will directly benefit their communities.

The Tier-2 Corporate License will require heavier testing and will most probably be focused on products mainly. While there will be a handful of “flower companies” in this tier, I would imagine that most of them would be selling pre-packaged goods such as drinks, edibles, and other products.

These Tier -2 licenses will also have the ability to sell across state lines, meaning they will be able to play on the national market.

With this solution, having the public compete with the cartels will drive the price per gram down meaning that the risk of running an illegal grow operation becomes more problematic and unsustainable. As a result, most cartels will do what bootleggers did in the 1920s when they repealed alcohol prohibition – go legit!

It would make much more sense to invest into corporate companies that can sell in major retailers and has a national reach than trying to compete with the much more cost effective local market.

This approach solves pretty much all of the major issues with legalization;

  1. It gives equal opportunity to minority communities
  2. It promotes growth
  3. It eliminates the black market and replaces it with the “local market”
  4. It provides jobs
  5. Cannabis becomes truly “of the people”.

In fact, I believe this to be the best model for the entire nation. Can you imagine each state has a local marketplace – where the weed grown in Colorado and California are different because of the soil, altitude, grow techniques, etc.

Yet also be able to get “corporate weed” that remains pretty uniform irrespective of where you are. This is the solution that can work if only implemented.

But people like Bonta would never think of something like this because they are trained to utilize a sledge hammer to drive in a nail. They don’t want the drug war to end because it would essentially take their EPIC program, and reduce it to nothing.

Then how else would they get all that public money to pay people to run around in the forest burning plants because the cartels are growing it illegally?

It’s time to fight back!

Don’t let places like California reinvent the drug war. The Drug War is a failure. It always has been. It has never achieved a single goal it set out to achieve. It won’t do it now either.

The only way is if we get beyond the idea of “drugs are bad” and begin to embrace the fact that humanity will use drugs whether it’s legal or not. We should not use law enforcement for drugs – we need education. We need programs that teach people the right way to use drugs.

Of course, Californians will probably just let this happen. Those who are growing illegally will continue to grow. Public money will continue to be used to fuel Drug War 2.0 and people like Bonta will continue to boast about their victories – victories that achieve nothing.

Source: https://cannabis.net/blog/opinion/californias-drug-war-2.0-a-closer-look-at-the-states-campaign-against-marijuana-planting-camp

Business

Jio’s 1,600-Satellite LEO Constellation Gets Technical Green Light

Published

on

By

Reliance Jio has crossed a significant milestone in its space connectivity ambitions after its proposal to deploy a Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite constellation of around 1,600 satellites received a positive technical assessment from the Indian National Space Promotion and Authorisation Centre (IN-SPACe).

The evaluation, conducted jointly by IN-SPACe, the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO), and the Wireless Planning and Coordination (WPC) wing of the Department of Telecommunications, reportedly concluded that Jio’s proposed system meets the required technical standards and is comparable to leading global satellite broadband networks.

India’s Indigenous LEO Satellite Vision

Under the proposal, Reliance Jio plans to deploy between 1,600 and 1,650 satellites in Low Earth Orbit at an altitude of around 650 kilometres.

The planned constellation is expected to provide high-speed satellite connectivity across India, with approximately 32 satellites visible from any location at a given time. The company aims to roll out the network within the next two to three years, subject to regulatory approvals.

According to industry estimates, the satellite system could deliver 4.5 to 5 terabits per second (Tbps) of total data capacity, making it one of the largest satellite broadband projects proposed in India.

The project is expected to require an investment of $10–15 billion (approximately ₹95,000 crore to ₹1.42 lakh crore), reflecting the scale of infrastructure needed for satellite manufacturing, launches, ground stations, and user terminals.

Regulatory Process Moves Forward

Following the successful technical review, the proposal is expected to move into the next phase of regulatory approvals.

The government may now assist Jio in securing orbital slots, coordinating spectrum usage, and filing applications with the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), the global body responsible for managing satellite orbit and frequency allocations.

Obtaining orbital rights remains a critical step, as Low Earth Orbit has become increasingly competitive due to the growing number of satellite broadband projects being planned worldwide.

Officials also indicated that the proposed satellite architecture has been designed to coexist with future Indian LEO constellations, allowing multiple domestic operators to share orbital resources efficiently.

Broadband, Mobile Connectivity, and Strategic Applications

Jio plans to use the satellite network to provide a range of communication services, including satellite broadband, mobile backhaul, enterprise connectivity, and direct-to-device (D2D) satellite communication, particularly in remote and underserved regions where conventional telecom infrastructure is limited.

The company also intends to establish 20 to 22 ground stations across India to support network operations.

Apart from commercial telecommunications, officials have highlighted the project’s potential strategic importance. A domestically developed satellite constellation could strengthen India’s communication infrastructure, reduce dependence on foreign satellite operators, and support national security requirements.

Reports suggest preliminary discussions are underway regarding the possibility of integrating defence-related payloads into some satellites, enabling both civilian and strategic use.

Major Step for India’s Space and Telecom Sectors

Industry analysts view the technical clearance as an important milestone in India’s expanding private space ecosystem. If Jio secures the remaining regulatory approvals and international orbital clearances, the project could become the country’s first large-scale indigenous LEO satellite broadband network.

The initiative also aligns with India’s broader efforts to expand digital connectivity while strengthening its presence in the global satellite communications market.

Continue Reading

Business

Alleged Crores Pharma Scam Mastermind Arrested from Surat

Published

on

By

After evading law enforcement for nearly 13 years, an accused linked to a large-scale pharmaceutical fraud case has been arrested by Delhi Police from Surat, Gujarat. The suspect is alleged to have orchestrated a series of financial scams involving fake identities, forged documents, and dishonoured cheques used to procure high-value pharmaceutical raw materials.

Authorities say the accused, identified as Himmat Singh Lodha, is believed to have defrauded multiple pharmaceutical companies in Delhi of goods worth approximately ₹98 lakh before disappearing and remaining underground for years.

Fake Business Deals and Dishonoured Cheques Used in Fraud

Investigators claim the accused posed as a legitimate pharmaceutical trader and placed bulk orders for expensive drug ingredients, offering post-dated cheques as payment security.

In one documented case from 2013, he allegedly obtained around 550 kilograms of Gliclazide, a diabetes-related pharmaceutical ingredient, valued at over ₹26 lakh. When suppliers attempted to encash the cheques, they were reportedly returned with the remark “account closed.”

Following the transaction, the accused allegedly vacated his office and rented residence and disappeared without settling payments. He was later declared a proclaimed offender in 2016 after repeatedly failing to appear before court proceedings. Authorities had also issued a reward for information leading to his arrest.

Multiple Identities and Repeated Fraud Pattern

Police investigations further link the accused to another cheating case dating back to 2012, where he allegedly used a fake identity, “Kailash Jain,” to obtain a large consignment of Ambroxol HCL, a pharmaceutical compound used in cough medications. The value of that consignment was estimated at around ₹72 lakh.

Officials believe the accused followed a consistent modus operandi—posing as a credible businessman, securing high-value goods on deferred payment terms, and then disappearing after delivery while shutting down business operations.

Investigators suspect that forged business records, fake company credentials, and fabricated financial histories were used to build trust with suppliers and gain access to expensive raw materials.

Multi-State Surveillance Leads to Arrest in Surat

A special Crime Branch team tracked the accused through coordinated surveillance efforts across multiple cities, including Mumbai, Ahmedabad, and Surat. After nearly a month of technical monitoring and intelligence gathering, officials located and arrested him from a residential area in Surat.

Authorities also revealed that the accused had been involved in property-related activities while staying under the radar to avoid detection.

Growing Threat of Corporate Identity Fraud

The case highlights a rising trend of organised financial fraud targeting industries that rely heavily on trust-based transactions and deferred payments. Experts note that criminals increasingly exploit gaps in corporate verification systems by using fake GST registrations, temporary offices, and forged documentation to appear legitimate.

Cybercrime and financial fraud specialists warn that such schemes are becoming more complex with the widespread availability of digital business tools, making it easier to create convincing but fraudulent corporate identities.

Experts Urge Stronger Due Diligence in High-Value Transactions

Experts, including former IPS officer and cybercrime specialist Prof. Triveni Singh, emphasize the need for stricter verification procedures in commercial dealings. He noted that relying solely on paperwork or digital business profiles can expose companies to significant financial risk.

Authorities and industry experts recommend physical verification of business operations, bank account validation, and detailed background checks before engaging in high-value or deferred-payment transactions—particularly in sectors like pharmaceuticals, where single consignments can involve transactions worth crores.

Continue Reading

Business

EU Pressure Builds on Google as Regulators Face Calls for Massive Fine Over Search Practices

Published

on

By

A growing coalition of European industry groups is intensifying pressure on regulators to take decisive action against Google over allegations of unfair search practices that could reshape competition rules across the region’s digital economy.

Investigation Under Digital Markets Act Gains Momentum

The case is being examined by the European Commission under the European Union’s landmark Digital Markets Act (DMA), introduced to curb the dominance of major technology platforms and ensure fair competition.

Launched in March 2024, the investigation focuses on whether Google has been prioritising its own services in search results, potentially disadvantaging rival businesses that rely on online visibility to reach customers.

Industry Groups Demand Swift Action

Several prominent European organizations have jointly urged regulators to conclude the probe without further delay. They argue that prolonged investigations allow alleged anti-competitive practices to continue, putting European companies—especially startups—at a disadvantage.

Signatories include the European Publishers Council, the European Magazine Media Association, the European Tech Alliance, and EU Travel Tech.

In a joint statement, these groups warned that delays in enforcement are affecting innovation, profitability, and growth prospects for regional businesses competing in digital markets.

Google Denies Allegations

Google has rejected claims of bias, stating that its search algorithms are designed to deliver the most relevant and useful results to users. The company has also proposed adjustments to address regulatory concerns.

However, critics argue that these changes are insufficient and fail to address the core issue of market dominance.

Potential Billion-Euro Penalties

If found in violation of the DMA, Google could face significant financial penalties. Under EU rules, fines can reach a substantial percentage of a company’s global turnover, potentially amounting to billions of euros.

Regulators may also impose corrective measures requiring changes to business practices, which could have long-term implications for how digital platforms operate in Europe.

Wider Implications for Big Tech

The case highlights ongoing tensions between European regulators and major U.S. technology firms. In recent years, the EU has taken a more aggressive stance in enforcing competition laws, aiming to create a level playing field for local businesses.

A final ruling against Google could set a major precedent, influencing future enforcement actions and shaping the regulatory landscape for global tech companies operating within Europe.

As scrutiny intensifies, the outcome of the investigation is expected to play a critical role in defining the future of digital competition across the European Union.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 420 Reports Marijuana News & Information Website | Reefer News | Cannabis News