Connect with us

Business

$38M suit alleging kickbacks, ‘sabotage’ at cannabis firm Cookies is abruptly dropped

Published

on

The legal controversy swirling around prominent cannabis brand Cookies has taken an abrupt and unusual turn, with one of the litigants who sued the company earlier this year dropping a lawsuit and walking back sworn statements made in court.

In a lawsuit and subsequent filings in Los Angeles County Superior Court, Paul Rock, CEO of a Florida-based company called Cookies Retail Products, claimed that Cookies executives tried to “sabotage” a multimillion-dollar deal in which CRP would license the Cookies brand and sell delta-8 THC and CBD products.

Rock claimed that Cookies executives took kickbacks from arrangements with third-party vendors, similar to allegations made in a separate lawsuit brought by Cookies investors that’s still pending.

Rock also claimed that Cookies executives, including company President Parker Berling and Chief Financial Officer Ian Habenicht, meddled in purchase orders with those vendors, leading to lengthy delays that left CRP stuck with “millions of dollars in spoiling vape cartridges” and other unsold cannabis products.

When Rock brought his concerns to executives at California-based Cookies, one of them, Michael Roberts, disparagingly dismissed his claims in a text message, the suit alleged.

Rock’s original suit claimed $38 million in damages.

Suit ‘voluntarily dismissed’

Late Friday, public relations representatives for Cookies pointed MJBizDaily to a statement purportedly from Rock in which he said he “voluntarily dismissed all suits” and that the original suit was brought only on the urging of an unidentified third party.

“Certain third parties influenced us to file suit based upon allegations that we learned were not true, so we took immediate steps to rectify the mistake by dismissing the suit,” according to the statement attributed to Rock.

The CRP chief executive went on to blame the media for covering the issue.

“(I)t is a shame that our dismissed suit was used in such a manner and find the timing is suspect given recent positive growth for the brand and our company,” Rock said, according to the statement.

“We at CRP consider this mischaracterization of our own closed legal action to be shameful and opportunistic.”

According to a Los Angeles County Superior Court docket viewed Monday by MJBizDaily, Rock’s lawsuit against Cookies is still pending.

Reached briefly on his cellphone Monday, Rock said he was “in the shower” and could not comment.

Fadi Rasheed, Rock’s lawyer at the El Segundo office of national law firm Leech-Tishman Fuscaldo & Lamp, did not respond to an MJBizDaily email seeking comment.

A message left at the office was not returned.

Contacted via Denver-based cannabis marketing firm Grasslands, Cookies did not immediately comment to MJBizDaily.

CRP’s lawsuit did not name Gilbert Milam Jr., better known as Berner, Cookies’ charismatic co-founder and CEO, who commands a significant social media presence and is one of the industry’s most powerful influencers.

Second lawsuit still in play

A second, separate litigation filed against Berner, Berling and other Cookies executives by two current investors in the company, who together claim to own about 10% of the business, is still pending.

In an Instagram post on Monday, Berner shared part of Rock’s statement.

“A bunch of stuff popped up online last week,” he wrote. “It feels good to set the record straight on this one.”

Rich Howell, one of the attorneys at Irvine, Calif.-based Rutan who filed the second suit on behalf of the two Cookies investors, called Rock’s backpedaling a “complete reversal” but said in the statement that his client’s legal action would continue.

“We have no insight into the circumstances that prompted this complete reversal from the detailed allegations set forth in the formal pleadings submitted by CRP against Cookies Creative Consulting & Promotions, Inc and various other defendants in the Los Angeles Superior Court,” Howell said.

He also noted that Rock’s claims were “verified and sworn to under penalty of perjury.”

“Regardless, this reversal has no bearing or impact upon our clients’ legal claims involving Cookies and its principals.”

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/38-milllion-suit-against-cannabis-firm-cookies-is-abruptly-dropped/

Business

New Mexico cannabis operator fined, loses license for alleged BioTrack fraud

Published

on

New Mexico regulators fined a cannabis operator nearly $300,000 and revoked its license after the company allegedly created fake reports in the state’s traceability software.

The New Mexico Cannabis Control Division (CCD) accused marijuana manufacturer and retailer Golden Roots of 11 violations, according to Albuquerque Business First.

Golden Roots operates the The Cannabis Revolution Dispensary.

The majority of the violations are related to the Albuquerque company’s improper use of BioTrack, which has been New Mexico’s track-and-trace vendor since 2015.

The CCD alleges Golden Roots reported marijuana production only two months after it had received its vertically integrated license, according to Albuquerque Business First.

Because cannabis takes longer than two months to be cultivated, the CCD was suspicious of the report.

After inspecting the company’s premises, the CCD alleged Golden Roots reported cultivation, transportation and sales in BioTrack but wasn’t able to provide officers who inspected the site evidence that the operator was cultivating cannabis.

In April, the CCD revoked Golden Roots’ license and issued a $10,000 fine, according to the news outlet.

The company requested a hearing, which the regulator scheduled for Sept. 1.

At the hearing, the CCD testified that the company’s dried-cannabis weights in BioTrack were suspicious because they didn’t seem to accurately reflect how much weight marijuana loses as it dries.

Company employees also poorly accounted for why they were making adjustments in the system of up to 24 pounds of cannabis, making comments such as “bad” or “mistake” in the software, Albuquerque Business First reported.

Golden Roots was fined $298,972.05 – the amount regulators allege the company made selling products that weren’t properly accounted for in BioTrack.

The CCD has been cracking down on cannabis operators accused of selling products procured from out-of-state or not grown legally:

Golden Roots was the first alleged rulebreaker in New Mexico to be asked to pay a large fine.

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/new-mexico-cannabis-operator-fined-loses-license-for-alleged-biotrack-fraud/

Continue Reading

Business

Marijuana companies suing US attorney general in federal prohibition challenge

Published

on

Four marijuana companies, including a multistate operator, have filed a lawsuit against U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland in which they allege the federal MJ prohibition under the Controlled Substances Act is no longer constitutional.

According to the complaint, filed Thursday in U.S. District Court in Massachusetts, retailer Canna Provisions, Treevit delivery service CEO Gyasi Sellers, cultivator Wiseacre Farm and MSO Verano Holdings Corp. are all harmed by “the federal government’s unconstitutional ban on cultivating, manufacturing, distributing, or possessing intrastate marijuana.”

Verano is headquartered in Chicago but has operations in Massachusetts; the other three operators are based in Massachusetts.

The lawsuit seeks a ruling that the “Controlled Substances Act is unconstitutional as applied to the intrastate cultivation, manufacture, possession, and distribution of marijuana pursuant to state law.”

The companies want the case to go before the U.S. Supreme Court.

They hired prominent law firm Boies Schiller Flexner to represent them.

The New York-based firm’s principal is David Boies, whose former clients include Microsoft, former presidential candidate Al Gore and Elizabeth Holmes’ disgraced startup Theranos.

Similar challenges to the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA) have failed.

One such challenge led to a landmark Supreme Court decision in 2005.

In Gonzalez vs. Raich, the highest court in the United States ruled in a 6-3 decision that the commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution gave Congress the power to outlaw marijuana federally, even though state laws allow the cultivation and sale of cannabis.

In the 18 years since that ruling, 23 states and the District of Columbia have legalized adult-use marijuana and the federal government has allowed a multibillion-dollar cannabis industry to thrive.

Since both Congress and the U.S. Department of Justice, currently headed by Garland, have declined to intervene in state-licensed marijuana markets, the key facts that led to the Supreme Court’s 2005 ruling “no longer apply,” Boies said in a statement Thursday.

“The Supreme Court has since made clear that the federal government lacks the authority to regulate purely intrastate commerce,” Boies said.

“Moreover, the facts on which those precedents are based are no longer true.”

Verano President Darren Weiss said in a statement the company is “prepared to bring this case all the way to the Supreme Court in order to align federal law with how Congress has acted for years.”

While the Biden administration’s push to reschedule marijuana would help solve marijuana operators’ federal tax woes, neither rescheduling nor modest Congressional reforms such as the SAFER Banking Act “solve the fundamental issue,” Weiss added.

“The application of the CSA to lawful state-run cannabis business is an unconstitutional overreach on state sovereignty that has led to decades of harm, failed businesses, lost jobs, and unsafe working conditions.”

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/marijuana-companies-suing-us-attorney-general-to-overturn-federal-prohibition/

Continue Reading

Business

Alabama to make another attempt Dec. 1 to award medical cannabis licenses

Published

on

Alabama regulators are targeting Dec. 1 to award the first batch of medical cannabis business licenses after the agency’s first two attempts were scrapped because of scoring errors and litigation.

The first licenses will be awarded to individual cultivators, delivery providers, processors, dispensaries and state testing labs, according to the Alabama Medical Cannabis Commission (AMCC).

Then, on Dec. 12, the AMCC will award licenses for vertically integrated operations, a designation set primarily for multistate operators.

Licenses are expected to be handed out 28 days after they have been awarded, so MMJ production could begin in early January, according to the Alabama Daily News.

That means MMJ products could be available for patients around early March, an AMCC spokesperson told the media outlet.

Regulators initially awarded 21 business licenses in June, only to void them after applicants alleged inconsistencies with how the applications were scored.

Then, in August, the state awarded 24 different licenses – 19 went to June recipients – only to reverse themselves again and scratch those licenses after spurned applicants filed lawsuits.

A state judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by Chicago-based MSO Verano Holdings Corp., but another lawsuit is pending.

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/alabama-plans-to-award-medical-cannabis-licenses-dec-1/

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 420 Reports Marijuana News & Information Website | Reefer News | Cannabis News