Connect with us

Business

Cannabis Company Sued for Not Getting People High Enough – Inflated THC Potency Claims Cause California Lawsuit

Published

on

Can you sue if your cannabis product has inflated THC percentagesj on the packaging?

sued over thc levels

The latest lawsuit making waves in the US cannabis industry is against the makers of Jeeters’ pre-rolled joints. The lawsuit alleges that the giant company has been falsifying details of its THC composition. According to the lawsuit, the joints do the opposite of what the company claims, as it contains far less THC compounds than stated.

Jeeter brand’s prerolled joints are some of the most popular cannabis joints in the market. And their catchphrase, “get you to mars quicker than Elon Musk”, has appealed to several cannabis lovers and is one of the reasons why the products have sold very well in the market.

Smoke Jeeters To Stay Closer to Earth

The lawsuit was filed early this month in the Superior Court in Los Angeles. The plaintiff alleged that the THC composition claims on the Jeeter labels are far from correct. They explained that the defendants have dramatically overstated THC content on all products by DreamFields Brand Inc. and Med for America Inc. The complaint also reads that the defendants intentionally misled consumers into assuming that the psychoactive effects of THC in the prerolls are more effective than they are.

According to the lawsuit, the producers of Jeeter cannabis joints are falsifying claims to push sales and make more profits. This is because most cannabis lovers are all about potency, and when they can, they are always willing to pay a premium.

Two California residents brought on the lawsuit, and they are represented by the Santa Monica-based law firm Dovel & Luner. The 26-page lawsuit was filed on October 20 by Long Beach residents Jasper Centeno and Blake Wilson of Fresno. These plaintiffs seek to be compensated with unspecified damages and restitution. The law firm also says it is working towards elevating the lawsuit’s status to a class action.

The California Department of Cannabis Control rule establishing a 10% margin of error for the THC concentration reported on the packaging forms the basis of the complaint. The real THC of the product must be between 27 and 30%, according to the lawsuit, if the THC content is expressed as a percentage and is listed as 30%. The counsel for the plaintiffs cited testing of Jeeter products conducted by Weed Week and reported in a September article, which revealed that the THC level in some products was far lower than stated on the label.

According to the complaint, the Baby Jeeter Fire OG Diamond Infused 5-Pack Preroll’s THC content was listed on the label as being 46%. However, the independent lab testing revealed that the product’s real THC concentration was far lower, ranging from 23-27% THC. The THC concentration was therefore exaggerated by 70 to 100%, which is far greater than the 10% margin of error permitted by California laws.

Basis of The Plaintiff’s Claims

According to state law, marijuana businesses must test their products for poisons and other contaminants besides THC. A certificate of analysis that must be given to state regulators contains the findings of those tests.

Several items from the Jeeter range were tested by Weed Week, including Baby Jete Fire OG Diamond Infused joints, which were reported to have 46% THC by weight. The certificate of analysis for the product also revealed a 46% THC concentration. According to Weed Week, testing revealed that the real content was between 23% and 27%, representing an “implied inflation” of up to 100%.

In response to WeedWeek’s findings for the Fire OG product, Georg Kallert of Landau Labs, which tested items for Jeeter, stated: “A check of provided CoAs shows moisture content analysis was conducted differently from Landau Labs…thus final results were falsely lowered.” Also, in response to WeedWeek’s claim that Jeeter’s Churros Diamond Infused 5-Pack Preroll has implied THC inflation of 28% to 42%, Kallert stated that Landau Labs stood by its findings.

A Baseless and Ludicrous Case

The Jeeter brand described the lawsuit as “baseless and ludicrous”. In an email, the team explained that the claims were lies.  It can be recalled that Forbes claimed that Jeeter joints, sold in millions each year, were the best-selling pre-rolls in the nation last year.

The team explained that the accusations were false and intended to destroy the brand’s reputation and business procedures.  They stressed that they are proud of their adherence and dedication to the independent, third-party testing requirements set forth by the state. As a firm, they place a high value on the product and its integrity, and they take all necessary legal precautions before releasing the product.

The brand statement reads, “Our love for cannabis and our commitment to morality, values, and culture formed the basis of the firm we have developed. We are proud of all the jobs we have produced and the progress we have made in the sector. We take these allegations extremely seriously and are eager to learn the truth, no matter how absurd and unfounded they are.”

To prove their innocence, the brand has challenged the plaintiffs and other complainants to show where they have violated their stated THC contents. In the concluding part of the email, the company stated that it looks forward to the truth emerging.

The weed week article did point out that the experiment was imperfect since it did not take into consideration factors like how long the products had been on store shelves or whether they had possibly been exposed to severe temperatures. According to Weed Week, the test implies potency inflation is rampant in California. The results, however, are insufficient to apply to any specific brand, business, product, or testing facility. The article also mentions that Jeeter items were tested twice, with the second round including a bigger sample size and Jeeter paying for the products’ costs. Between 28% and 42% of inflation was visible in the second round.

Final Note

The main reason customers buy cannabis is its therapeutic and psychological effects, and the THC level of the product substantially drives those therapeutic and psychological effects. Like attorney Christin Cho of Dovel & Kuner said, consumers are willing to pay more for cannabis products with higher THC concentration and anticipate spending less for cannabis goods with lower THC content.

Source: https://cannabis.net/blog/news/cannabis-company-sued-for-not-getting-people-high-enough-inflated-thc-potency-claims-cause-cali

Business

New Mexico cannabis operator fined, loses license for alleged BioTrack fraud

Published

on

New Mexico regulators fined a cannabis operator nearly $300,000 and revoked its license after the company allegedly created fake reports in the state’s traceability software.

The New Mexico Cannabis Control Division (CCD) accused marijuana manufacturer and retailer Golden Roots of 11 violations, according to Albuquerque Business First.

Golden Roots operates the The Cannabis Revolution Dispensary.

The majority of the violations are related to the Albuquerque company’s improper use of BioTrack, which has been New Mexico’s track-and-trace vendor since 2015.

The CCD alleges Golden Roots reported marijuana production only two months after it had received its vertically integrated license, according to Albuquerque Business First.

Because cannabis takes longer than two months to be cultivated, the CCD was suspicious of the report.

After inspecting the company’s premises, the CCD alleged Golden Roots reported cultivation, transportation and sales in BioTrack but wasn’t able to provide officers who inspected the site evidence that the operator was cultivating cannabis.

In April, the CCD revoked Golden Roots’ license and issued a $10,000 fine, according to the news outlet.

The company requested a hearing, which the regulator scheduled for Sept. 1.

At the hearing, the CCD testified that the company’s dried-cannabis weights in BioTrack were suspicious because they didn’t seem to accurately reflect how much weight marijuana loses as it dries.

Company employees also poorly accounted for why they were making adjustments in the system of up to 24 pounds of cannabis, making comments such as “bad” or “mistake” in the software, Albuquerque Business First reported.

Golden Roots was fined $298,972.05 – the amount regulators allege the company made selling products that weren’t properly accounted for in BioTrack.

The CCD has been cracking down on cannabis operators accused of selling products procured from out-of-state or not grown legally:

Golden Roots was the first alleged rulebreaker in New Mexico to be asked to pay a large fine.

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/new-mexico-cannabis-operator-fined-loses-license-for-alleged-biotrack-fraud/

Continue Reading

Business

Marijuana companies suing US attorney general in federal prohibition challenge

Published

on

Four marijuana companies, including a multistate operator, have filed a lawsuit against U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland in which they allege the federal MJ prohibition under the Controlled Substances Act is no longer constitutional.

According to the complaint, filed Thursday in U.S. District Court in Massachusetts, retailer Canna Provisions, Treevit delivery service CEO Gyasi Sellers, cultivator Wiseacre Farm and MSO Verano Holdings Corp. are all harmed by “the federal government’s unconstitutional ban on cultivating, manufacturing, distributing, or possessing intrastate marijuana.”

Verano is headquartered in Chicago but has operations in Massachusetts; the other three operators are based in Massachusetts.

The lawsuit seeks a ruling that the “Controlled Substances Act is unconstitutional as applied to the intrastate cultivation, manufacture, possession, and distribution of marijuana pursuant to state law.”

The companies want the case to go before the U.S. Supreme Court.

They hired prominent law firm Boies Schiller Flexner to represent them.

The New York-based firm’s principal is David Boies, whose former clients include Microsoft, former presidential candidate Al Gore and Elizabeth Holmes’ disgraced startup Theranos.

Similar challenges to the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA) have failed.

One such challenge led to a landmark Supreme Court decision in 2005.

In Gonzalez vs. Raich, the highest court in the United States ruled in a 6-3 decision that the commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution gave Congress the power to outlaw marijuana federally, even though state laws allow the cultivation and sale of cannabis.

In the 18 years since that ruling, 23 states and the District of Columbia have legalized adult-use marijuana and the federal government has allowed a multibillion-dollar cannabis industry to thrive.

Since both Congress and the U.S. Department of Justice, currently headed by Garland, have declined to intervene in state-licensed marijuana markets, the key facts that led to the Supreme Court’s 2005 ruling “no longer apply,” Boies said in a statement Thursday.

“The Supreme Court has since made clear that the federal government lacks the authority to regulate purely intrastate commerce,” Boies said.

“Moreover, the facts on which those precedents are based are no longer true.”

Verano President Darren Weiss said in a statement the company is “prepared to bring this case all the way to the Supreme Court in order to align federal law with how Congress has acted for years.”

While the Biden administration’s push to reschedule marijuana would help solve marijuana operators’ federal tax woes, neither rescheduling nor modest Congressional reforms such as the SAFER Banking Act “solve the fundamental issue,” Weiss added.

“The application of the CSA to lawful state-run cannabis business is an unconstitutional overreach on state sovereignty that has led to decades of harm, failed businesses, lost jobs, and unsafe working conditions.”

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/marijuana-companies-suing-us-attorney-general-to-overturn-federal-prohibition/

Continue Reading

Business

Alabama to make another attempt Dec. 1 to award medical cannabis licenses

Published

on

Alabama regulators are targeting Dec. 1 to award the first batch of medical cannabis business licenses after the agency’s first two attempts were scrapped because of scoring errors and litigation.

The first licenses will be awarded to individual cultivators, delivery providers, processors, dispensaries and state testing labs, according to the Alabama Medical Cannabis Commission (AMCC).

Then, on Dec. 12, the AMCC will award licenses for vertically integrated operations, a designation set primarily for multistate operators.

Licenses are expected to be handed out 28 days after they have been awarded, so MMJ production could begin in early January, according to the Alabama Daily News.

That means MMJ products could be available for patients around early March, an AMCC spokesperson told the media outlet.

Regulators initially awarded 21 business licenses in June, only to void them after applicants alleged inconsistencies with how the applications were scored.

Then, in August, the state awarded 24 different licenses – 19 went to June recipients – only to reverse themselves again and scratch those licenses after spurned applicants filed lawsuits.

A state judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by Chicago-based MSO Verano Holdings Corp., but another lawsuit is pending.

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/alabama-plans-to-award-medical-cannabis-licenses-dec-1/

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 420 Reports Marijuana News & Information Website | Reefer News | Cannabis News