Connect with us

Business

Do You Like It Fast or Strong? – The Difference Between Smoking Cannabis and Eating a Marijuana Edible

Published

on

Onset may be quicker through the lungs, but the high is strong when it goes through the liver!

As marijuana legalization spreads across various states, from Colorado to New York, an increasingly common question emerges: Which offers a better experience, smoking weed or consuming it through edibles?

The edibles versus smoking weed debate is influenced by many factors unique to each individual, including the type of cannabis experience they desire. Factors such as different strainsterpene profiles, and cannabinoid ratios play pivotal roles in shaping one’s experience, affecting both the intensity of the high and its duration.

Beyond potency, the method of consumption exerts the most significant influence on one’s cannabis encounter. Whether you choose to ingest cannabis edibles or smoke marijuana can yield entirely distinct experiences.

In this article, we will delve into how the ingestion of cannabis edibles and smoking cannabis impacts the brain and body, highlighting both their commonalities and disparities. We will also explore the metabolism of THC and guide accurately dosing weed edibles to ensure the optimal experience.

What Are Edibles?

Edibles refer to food items that contain marijuana as an ingredient. While smoking marijuana remains the most commonly used method of consumption, the consumption of marijuana through edibles is rapidly gaining popularity.

Edible cannabis products generally offer similar benefits to other cannabis consumption methods. People use them to attain specific effects, such as relaxation, or for medicinal purposes, like managing chronic pain.

The impact of edibles varies depending on the quantity consumed. Generally, the effects become more pronounced as the dosage increases. Nonetheless, it’s important to note that overindulging in cannabis edibles is quite easy, leading to potential adverse reactions like nausea and vomiting.

Smoking vs. Edible Euphoria

Do smoking weed and consuming edibles have the same effects? Not quite!

When you smoke cannabis, the active compounds known as cannabinoids are swiftly absorbed through the lungs and into the bloodstream, effectively crossing the blood-brain barrier. This rapid entry allows cannabinoids like delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), commonly called delta-9-THC, to reach the brain promptly.

Once THC and other cannabinoids, such as cannabidiol (CBD), interact with receptors within the endocannabinoid system (ECS), particularly the CB1 receptors, they generate the sensation of “high” and euphoria that is typically associated with cannabis use.

Smoking cannabis leads to a rapid delivery of THC to the brain, resulting in short-term effects that onset quickly. Smoking weed provides an almost instant sensation, with the peak effects typically occurring within 2 to 4 hours.

On the other hand, edibles follow a different path. They navigate through the digestive tract, where absorption occurs in the stomach, and they undergo metabolism in the liver. THC is converted into 11-hydroxy-THC within the liver, a more potent and longer-lasting compound than delta-9-THC. This is why edibles are known for being stronger, more potent, and have a prolonged effect duration compared to inhaled cannabis.

The high induced by ingesting edibles takes longer to manifest compared to inhaling THC. THC from edible cannabis embarks on a journey through the digestive tract before reaching the liver, where it undergoes conversion into the potent 11-Hydroxy-THC. This process typically takes 45 minutes to three hours before the effects become noticeable.

11-hydroxy-THC exerts significantly greater sedative, pronounced reactivity, and lasts for an extended period, often 8-12 hours. Consequently, the effects of edibles are likely to linger far longer than those of smoked cannabis.

For individuals used to smoking cannabis, there are a couple of perceived drawbacks regarding edibles. One is the absence of the familiar smoking ritual, and the other is the extended waiting time for the effects to kick in. Moreover, edibles can be packed with calories, sugar, and fats.

Dosing Edibles Correctly

Properly dosing weed edibles involves considering various factors interconnected with how the body metabolizes THC. When THC is consumed through ingestion, the liver plays a pivotal role in processing it before releasing it into the bloodstream, ultimately affecting the brain. Consequently, your experience with edibles is influenced by several critical variables:

  • The liver’s metabolic process for substances like cannabis.
  • The inclusion of fats or other foods alongside THC.
  • Individual tolerance levels for THC.

It’s important to note that there is no universally recommended standard THC dose, as these factors vary from person to person. Unlike some medications, which are dosed based on body weight, this approach does not apply to edibles.

Researchers commonly use 5 mg as the “standard” THC dose, but experts suggest starting with a more cautious 2.5 mg. In many regulated cannabis markets, the legal “standard” serving size for edibles is 5 mg, which may prove excessive for first-time users, women, or individuals susceptible to cannabis side effects.

For those interested in a cannabis microdosing approach, a recommended method involves abstaining from THC for at least 48 hours to prevent tolerance build-up. Subsequently, consumption should commence with just 1 mg of THC, followed by gradual incremental increases. A micro-dose typically falls within the 1-2.5 mg range for most users.

The range of 2.5-5 mg is generally suitable for most users. Higher doses, ranging from 15 to 30 mg, are more suitable for frequent edible users. In comparison, amounts exceeding 50 mg are typically reserved for medical marijuana patients or individuals with extensive THC experience.

Conclusion

The choice between smoking weed and consuming it through edibles ultimately comes down to personal preferences and desired effects. Both methods have their unique characteristics and impacts on the body. Smoking cannabis offers a rapid onset of products, providing a nearly instant sensation of euphoria. However, the duration of the high is relatively short-lived compared to edibles.

Conversely, edibles take longer to kick in but deliver a stronger and longer-lasting experience due to the conversion of THC in the liver. This method offers a more prolonged relaxation and euphoria, making it suitable for those seeking sustained relief or therapeutic benefits.

Ultimately, the choice between smoking and edibles depends on your preferences, goals, and how you want to experience cannabis. As marijuana legalization spreads, understanding these differences can help individuals make informed decisions about their consumption methods.

Source: https://cannabis.net/blog/opinion/do-you-like-it-fast-or-strong-the-difference-between-smoking-cannabis-and-eating-a-marijuana-ed

Business

New Mexico cannabis operator fined, loses license for alleged BioTrack fraud

Published

on

New Mexico regulators fined a cannabis operator nearly $300,000 and revoked its license after the company allegedly created fake reports in the state’s traceability software.

The New Mexico Cannabis Control Division (CCD) accused marijuana manufacturer and retailer Golden Roots of 11 violations, according to Albuquerque Business First.

Golden Roots operates the The Cannabis Revolution Dispensary.

The majority of the violations are related to the Albuquerque company’s improper use of BioTrack, which has been New Mexico’s track-and-trace vendor since 2015.

The CCD alleges Golden Roots reported marijuana production only two months after it had received its vertically integrated license, according to Albuquerque Business First.

Because cannabis takes longer than two months to be cultivated, the CCD was suspicious of the report.

After inspecting the company’s premises, the CCD alleged Golden Roots reported cultivation, transportation and sales in BioTrack but wasn’t able to provide officers who inspected the site evidence that the operator was cultivating cannabis.

In April, the CCD revoked Golden Roots’ license and issued a $10,000 fine, according to the news outlet.

The company requested a hearing, which the regulator scheduled for Sept. 1.

At the hearing, the CCD testified that the company’s dried-cannabis weights in BioTrack were suspicious because they didn’t seem to accurately reflect how much weight marijuana loses as it dries.

Company employees also poorly accounted for why they were making adjustments in the system of up to 24 pounds of cannabis, making comments such as “bad” or “mistake” in the software, Albuquerque Business First reported.

Golden Roots was fined $298,972.05 – the amount regulators allege the company made selling products that weren’t properly accounted for in BioTrack.

The CCD has been cracking down on cannabis operators accused of selling products procured from out-of-state or not grown legally:

Golden Roots was the first alleged rulebreaker in New Mexico to be asked to pay a large fine.

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/new-mexico-cannabis-operator-fined-loses-license-for-alleged-biotrack-fraud/

Continue Reading

Business

Marijuana companies suing US attorney general in federal prohibition challenge

Published

on

Four marijuana companies, including a multistate operator, have filed a lawsuit against U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland in which they allege the federal MJ prohibition under the Controlled Substances Act is no longer constitutional.

According to the complaint, filed Thursday in U.S. District Court in Massachusetts, retailer Canna Provisions, Treevit delivery service CEO Gyasi Sellers, cultivator Wiseacre Farm and MSO Verano Holdings Corp. are all harmed by “the federal government’s unconstitutional ban on cultivating, manufacturing, distributing, or possessing intrastate marijuana.”

Verano is headquartered in Chicago but has operations in Massachusetts; the other three operators are based in Massachusetts.

The lawsuit seeks a ruling that the “Controlled Substances Act is unconstitutional as applied to the intrastate cultivation, manufacture, possession, and distribution of marijuana pursuant to state law.”

The companies want the case to go before the U.S. Supreme Court.

They hired prominent law firm Boies Schiller Flexner to represent them.

The New York-based firm’s principal is David Boies, whose former clients include Microsoft, former presidential candidate Al Gore and Elizabeth Holmes’ disgraced startup Theranos.

Similar challenges to the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA) have failed.

One such challenge led to a landmark Supreme Court decision in 2005.

In Gonzalez vs. Raich, the highest court in the United States ruled in a 6-3 decision that the commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution gave Congress the power to outlaw marijuana federally, even though state laws allow the cultivation and sale of cannabis.

In the 18 years since that ruling, 23 states and the District of Columbia have legalized adult-use marijuana and the federal government has allowed a multibillion-dollar cannabis industry to thrive.

Since both Congress and the U.S. Department of Justice, currently headed by Garland, have declined to intervene in state-licensed marijuana markets, the key facts that led to the Supreme Court’s 2005 ruling “no longer apply,” Boies said in a statement Thursday.

“The Supreme Court has since made clear that the federal government lacks the authority to regulate purely intrastate commerce,” Boies said.

“Moreover, the facts on which those precedents are based are no longer true.”

Verano President Darren Weiss said in a statement the company is “prepared to bring this case all the way to the Supreme Court in order to align federal law with how Congress has acted for years.”

While the Biden administration’s push to reschedule marijuana would help solve marijuana operators’ federal tax woes, neither rescheduling nor modest Congressional reforms such as the SAFER Banking Act “solve the fundamental issue,” Weiss added.

“The application of the CSA to lawful state-run cannabis business is an unconstitutional overreach on state sovereignty that has led to decades of harm, failed businesses, lost jobs, and unsafe working conditions.”

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/marijuana-companies-suing-us-attorney-general-to-overturn-federal-prohibition/

Continue Reading

Business

Alabama to make another attempt Dec. 1 to award medical cannabis licenses

Published

on

Alabama regulators are targeting Dec. 1 to award the first batch of medical cannabis business licenses after the agency’s first two attempts were scrapped because of scoring errors and litigation.

The first licenses will be awarded to individual cultivators, delivery providers, processors, dispensaries and state testing labs, according to the Alabama Medical Cannabis Commission (AMCC).

Then, on Dec. 12, the AMCC will award licenses for vertically integrated operations, a designation set primarily for multistate operators.

Licenses are expected to be handed out 28 days after they have been awarded, so MMJ production could begin in early January, according to the Alabama Daily News.

That means MMJ products could be available for patients around early March, an AMCC spokesperson told the media outlet.

Regulators initially awarded 21 business licenses in June, only to void them after applicants alleged inconsistencies with how the applications were scored.

Then, in August, the state awarded 24 different licenses – 19 went to June recipients – only to reverse themselves again and scratch those licenses after spurned applicants filed lawsuits.

A state judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by Chicago-based MSO Verano Holdings Corp., but another lawsuit is pending.

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/alabama-plans-to-award-medical-cannabis-licenses-dec-1/

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 420 Reports Marijuana News & Information Website | Reefer News | Cannabis News