Connect with us

Business

California’s Drug War 2.0 – A Closer Look at the State’s Campaign Against Marijuana Planting (CAMP)

Published

on

A deep dive into the CAMP campaign to elimiate illegal cannabis grows in California

A Closer look at California’s “Drug War 2.0”

California has long been a pioneer when it comes to cannabis. However, this all changed when they “legalized” cannabis for recreational purposes. In fact, their roll out was so dismal, that they are now beginning to ramp up a new form of prohibition, and in fact, utilizing drug war tactics to “ensure” the success of their industry – unfortunately, it’s not working!

In today’s article we’re going to be taking a closer look at how California has managed to ruin a perfectly good system due to bureaucratic nonsense and greed.

This was perfectly highlighted in a recent Reason Article which outlined that California Attorney General – Rob Bonta – boasted about their “recent successes” in eradicating nearly a million “illegal” cannabis plants utilizing a program that was conceived in the height of the drug war.

The enforcement program Bonta refers to is the state’s Campaign Against Marijuana Planting (CAMP). It was founded as part of the war on drugs to try to tackle the many illegal marijuana grow operations across a massive state with huge swathes of undeveloped land.

The data itself is a fascinating look at how little drug legalization means when a state’s regulatory systems are so oppressive that it undermines the legal market. In 1984, CAMP’s first full year of operation, the program was responsible for the eradication of 158,000 marijuana plants. In 2022, after almost 40 years of a drug war and eight years of legalization in the state, that number has grown to 974,000 plants, spread across 449 operations in 26 counties, according to the October 11 announcement from Bonta’s office.

That’s right – under California’s heavily taxed and bureaucratic system, there has been an increase in the number of “illegal cannabis grows” and their failure to make a single dent in the illicit market. In fact, Bonta and his “drug warriors” are going to rebrand the CAMP taskforce into the Eradication and Prevention of Illicit Cannabis taskforce – or EPIC for short.

Bonta’s re-envisioning of this Drug War tool will actually be MORE draconian than it was under the prohibition rhetoric. In fact, he wants to modernize the drug war and rebrand it so him and his “eradicators” can continue to spend government money on hunting the “evils” of marijuana. Of course, he’s not outright saying “cannabis is bad”, but rather that the “illegal grows” are bad.

While it’s true that many of these illegal grows are in fact dangerous to both wildlife and even people, it didn’t swell to what it was just because. The true reason why the black market is thriving in California is due to their horrendous cannabis policies.

The fact of the matter is that Bonta will only take the old drug war rhetoric and tactics, rebrand it and continue on its endless war to stop the plant and keep money flowing into the pockets of the government. However, it will achieve absolutely nothing. They could eradicate 10 million plants and there will always be another illicit grow somewhere in the large swaths of undeveloped land in California.

If Drug Warrioring isn’t working – what will?

If you’re going to beat the Cartels or illicit grow operations, you need to remove their incentive. When the risk of getting caught outweighs the perceived benefits – these operations will cease to exist. The only way to do this is to lower taxes and the threshold for individuals to participate in the market.

Currently you need to have deep pockets to be able break into the Californian cannabis market and as a result, illegal grows make a killing. They risk a lot for growing on public land, however, they also make an insane amount of money.

In fact, many people continue to purchase on the Black Market simply because it’s cheaper. And it’s only cheaper because they don’t have to pay these insane tariffs and taxes.

So how can one cut off the supply?

Make it incredibly simple to get in on the weed game. I have written extensively on how this could be done where you create a 2-tier cannabis industry. The first tier will be designated to small cannabis operations where they can grow and sell cannabis in a “farmer’s market” type set up.

The overall cost for a license should be roughly $1,000 per year and should cover up to $1,000,000 annually in profits. Once this threshold is met, the company should have to upgrade to a “corporate license” where they would have other opportunities like being able to sell in major retailers like Walmart and the likes.

The Tier-1 licenses will be directed to entrepreneurs who will create jobs locally and will not be required a lot of testing. This is more of a peer-to-peer system where small markets can pop up, people can buy and sell their weed (and products), which will directly benefit their communities.

The Tier-2 Corporate License will require heavier testing and will most probably be focused on products mainly. While there will be a handful of “flower companies” in this tier, I would imagine that most of them would be selling pre-packaged goods such as drinks, edibles, and other products.

These Tier -2 licenses will also have the ability to sell across state lines, meaning they will be able to play on the national market.

With this solution, having the public compete with the cartels will drive the price per gram down meaning that the risk of running an illegal grow operation becomes more problematic and unsustainable. As a result, most cartels will do what bootleggers did in the 1920s when they repealed alcohol prohibition – go legit!

It would make much more sense to invest into corporate companies that can sell in major retailers and has a national reach than trying to compete with the much more cost effective local market.

This approach solves pretty much all of the major issues with legalization;

  1. It gives equal opportunity to minority communities
  2. It promotes growth
  3. It eliminates the black market and replaces it with the “local market”
  4. It provides jobs
  5. Cannabis becomes truly “of the people”.

In fact, I believe this to be the best model for the entire nation. Can you imagine each state has a local marketplace – where the weed grown in Colorado and California are different because of the soil, altitude, grow techniques, etc.

Yet also be able to get “corporate weed” that remains pretty uniform irrespective of where you are. This is the solution that can work if only implemented.

But people like Bonta would never think of something like this because they are trained to utilize a sledge hammer to drive in a nail. They don’t want the drug war to end because it would essentially take their EPIC program, and reduce it to nothing.

Then how else would they get all that public money to pay people to run around in the forest burning plants because the cartels are growing it illegally?

It’s time to fight back!

Don’t let places like California reinvent the drug war. The Drug War is a failure. It always has been. It has never achieved a single goal it set out to achieve. It won’t do it now either.

The only way is if we get beyond the idea of “drugs are bad” and begin to embrace the fact that humanity will use drugs whether it’s legal or not. We should not use law enforcement for drugs – we need education. We need programs that teach people the right way to use drugs.

Of course, Californians will probably just let this happen. Those who are growing illegally will continue to grow. Public money will continue to be used to fuel Drug War 2.0 and people like Bonta will continue to boast about their victories – victories that achieve nothing.

Source: https://cannabis.net/blog/opinion/californias-drug-war-2.0-a-closer-look-at-the-states-campaign-against-marijuana-planting-camp

Business

New Mexico cannabis operator fined, loses license for alleged BioTrack fraud

Published

on

New Mexico regulators fined a cannabis operator nearly $300,000 and revoked its license after the company allegedly created fake reports in the state’s traceability software.

The New Mexico Cannabis Control Division (CCD) accused marijuana manufacturer and retailer Golden Roots of 11 violations, according to Albuquerque Business First.

Golden Roots operates the The Cannabis Revolution Dispensary.

The majority of the violations are related to the Albuquerque company’s improper use of BioTrack, which has been New Mexico’s track-and-trace vendor since 2015.

The CCD alleges Golden Roots reported marijuana production only two months after it had received its vertically integrated license, according to Albuquerque Business First.

Because cannabis takes longer than two months to be cultivated, the CCD was suspicious of the report.

After inspecting the company’s premises, the CCD alleged Golden Roots reported cultivation, transportation and sales in BioTrack but wasn’t able to provide officers who inspected the site evidence that the operator was cultivating cannabis.

In April, the CCD revoked Golden Roots’ license and issued a $10,000 fine, according to the news outlet.

The company requested a hearing, which the regulator scheduled for Sept. 1.

At the hearing, the CCD testified that the company’s dried-cannabis weights in BioTrack were suspicious because they didn’t seem to accurately reflect how much weight marijuana loses as it dries.

Company employees also poorly accounted for why they were making adjustments in the system of up to 24 pounds of cannabis, making comments such as “bad” or “mistake” in the software, Albuquerque Business First reported.

Golden Roots was fined $298,972.05 – the amount regulators allege the company made selling products that weren’t properly accounted for in BioTrack.

The CCD has been cracking down on cannabis operators accused of selling products procured from out-of-state or not grown legally:

Golden Roots was the first alleged rulebreaker in New Mexico to be asked to pay a large fine.

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/new-mexico-cannabis-operator-fined-loses-license-for-alleged-biotrack-fraud/

Continue Reading

Business

Marijuana companies suing US attorney general in federal prohibition challenge

Published

on

Four marijuana companies, including a multistate operator, have filed a lawsuit against U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland in which they allege the federal MJ prohibition under the Controlled Substances Act is no longer constitutional.

According to the complaint, filed Thursday in U.S. District Court in Massachusetts, retailer Canna Provisions, Treevit delivery service CEO Gyasi Sellers, cultivator Wiseacre Farm and MSO Verano Holdings Corp. are all harmed by “the federal government’s unconstitutional ban on cultivating, manufacturing, distributing, or possessing intrastate marijuana.”

Verano is headquartered in Chicago but has operations in Massachusetts; the other three operators are based in Massachusetts.

The lawsuit seeks a ruling that the “Controlled Substances Act is unconstitutional as applied to the intrastate cultivation, manufacture, possession, and distribution of marijuana pursuant to state law.”

The companies want the case to go before the U.S. Supreme Court.

They hired prominent law firm Boies Schiller Flexner to represent them.

The New York-based firm’s principal is David Boies, whose former clients include Microsoft, former presidential candidate Al Gore and Elizabeth Holmes’ disgraced startup Theranos.

Similar challenges to the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA) have failed.

One such challenge led to a landmark Supreme Court decision in 2005.

In Gonzalez vs. Raich, the highest court in the United States ruled in a 6-3 decision that the commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution gave Congress the power to outlaw marijuana federally, even though state laws allow the cultivation and sale of cannabis.

In the 18 years since that ruling, 23 states and the District of Columbia have legalized adult-use marijuana and the federal government has allowed a multibillion-dollar cannabis industry to thrive.

Since both Congress and the U.S. Department of Justice, currently headed by Garland, have declined to intervene in state-licensed marijuana markets, the key facts that led to the Supreme Court’s 2005 ruling “no longer apply,” Boies said in a statement Thursday.

“The Supreme Court has since made clear that the federal government lacks the authority to regulate purely intrastate commerce,” Boies said.

“Moreover, the facts on which those precedents are based are no longer true.”

Verano President Darren Weiss said in a statement the company is “prepared to bring this case all the way to the Supreme Court in order to align federal law with how Congress has acted for years.”

While the Biden administration’s push to reschedule marijuana would help solve marijuana operators’ federal tax woes, neither rescheduling nor modest Congressional reforms such as the SAFER Banking Act “solve the fundamental issue,” Weiss added.

“The application of the CSA to lawful state-run cannabis business is an unconstitutional overreach on state sovereignty that has led to decades of harm, failed businesses, lost jobs, and unsafe working conditions.”

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/marijuana-companies-suing-us-attorney-general-to-overturn-federal-prohibition/

Continue Reading

Business

Alabama to make another attempt Dec. 1 to award medical cannabis licenses

Published

on

Alabama regulators are targeting Dec. 1 to award the first batch of medical cannabis business licenses after the agency’s first two attempts were scrapped because of scoring errors and litigation.

The first licenses will be awarded to individual cultivators, delivery providers, processors, dispensaries and state testing labs, according to the Alabama Medical Cannabis Commission (AMCC).

Then, on Dec. 12, the AMCC will award licenses for vertically integrated operations, a designation set primarily for multistate operators.

Licenses are expected to be handed out 28 days after they have been awarded, so MMJ production could begin in early January, according to the Alabama Daily News.

That means MMJ products could be available for patients around early March, an AMCC spokesperson told the media outlet.

Regulators initially awarded 21 business licenses in June, only to void them after applicants alleged inconsistencies with how the applications were scored.

Then, in August, the state awarded 24 different licenses – 19 went to June recipients – only to reverse themselves again and scratch those licenses after spurned applicants filed lawsuits.

A state judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by Chicago-based MSO Verano Holdings Corp., but another lawsuit is pending.

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/alabama-plans-to-award-medical-cannabis-licenses-dec-1/

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 420 Reports Marijuana News & Information Website | Reefer News | Cannabis News