Business
Why Are Heavy Metals, Like Lead and Cadmium, Testing So High in Cannabis Users’ Blood and Urine?
Are cannabis plants leaching heavy metals from the soil they are grown in?
In recent years, the growing acceptance and legalization of marijuana for recreational and medicinal use have spurred extensive research into its effects on health and well-being. Amid this evolving landscape, a noteworthy study has surfaced, shedding light on a pressing concern: heavy metal contamination in marijuana. This study, conducted by a dedicated team at Columbia University, has revealed unsettling data indicating that certain marijuana users may unwittingly expose themselves to heightened levels of heavy metals, specifically lead and cadmium, substances associated with profound and enduring health risks.
These results have broad repercussions because they force us to address a complex web of problems related to marijuana legalization safety, and use. Given that cannabis plants have the unique ability to absorb these pollutants from the soil in which they are grown, heavy metals, infamous for their harmful effects on human health, present a daunting barrier. Examining any hidden problems that might exist within this developing industry becomes more and more important as marijuana use spreads throughout numerous jurisdictions.
Study Methodology: A Closer Look at Blood and Urine
The study drew upon data from 2005 to 2018, sourced from the annual National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), a comprehensive health assessment of the American population. This survey serves as a vital tracking tool for monitoring the well-being of U.S. citizens.
Within this study, the researchers scrutinized blood and urine samples from 7,254 individuals who self-reported recent marijuana use (within the past 30 days). What sets this investigation apart is its distinctive focus on the heavy metal levels within these individuals rather than solely assessing heavy metal concentrations within cannabis plants, as is more common in related studies. According to Tiffany Sanchez, one of the study’s authors, this aspect renders the research unique. However, it’s essential to acknowledge that the study did not distinguish between individuals using marijuana for medical or recreational purposes, preventing definitive conclusions regarding metal levels among medical cannabis users. Sanchez emphasized the importance of further exploration in future research endeavors.
Heavy metals can adhere to body cells and obstruct their ability to operate normally. This phenomenon has a long history and has been linked to serious health issues like cancer, degenerative disorders, and neurotoxic consequences. Additionally, some segments of the population, such as those immunocompromised or undergoing chemotherapy, may be at higher risk of exposure to metals or other common pollutants found in cannabis, such as molds. It’s important to note that this area still needs more study and attention because it is still poorly understood.
It’s critical to understand that other people are also exposed to heavy metals; tobacco users, for example, are exposed to an even wider range of pollutants. Notably, it has been discovered that e-cigarettes contain high levels of metal aerosols such as nickel, chromium, lead, and zinc. Studies have also shown that e-liquids and the tanks of e-cigarettes include arsenic, lead, nickel, tin, manganese, copper, and chromium, further highlighting the complexity of problems related to substance abuse and significant health dangers.
Regulation and Safeguarding Against Heavy Metal Contamination
The issue of heavy metal contamination in marijuana products is further compounded by the fragmented legal landscape surrounding cannabis in the United States. With marijuana being illegal at the federal level but legal for recreational use in 22 states and permitted for medicinal use in 38 states, there exists a complex web of regulations and standards—or lack thereof.
In some states where marijuana is legal, regulations mandate testing for heavy metals, and strict limits are set on their concentrations in cannabis products. However, each state tends to establish its permissible levels of contaminants, leading to inconsistencies in safety standards.
Furthermore, illegal dispensaries in states where marijuana is legalized pose a significant challenge. These unregulated outlets often sell products that may not undergo rigorous testing for heavy metal contamination. Consumers may unknowingly purchase marijuana products with elevated levels of heavy metals from these unregulated sources.
Even hemp-derived products, which have gained popularity, lack consistent federal testing rules for heavy metals. Recent research has revealed heavy metal contamination in products like hemp-derived CBD e-cigarettes.
Despite these challenges, there are positive developments. States are progressively improving their screening processes for contaminants in marijuana products. Notably, the study cited includes data from before many states had fully legalized marijuana, suggesting that the situation might be evolving.
To safeguard against heavy metal contamination in marijuana products, consumers are encouraged to purchase from legal dispensaries, as these establishments typically adhere to state-mandated testing and quality control standards. State health department websites often provide lists of licensed dispensaries. Additionally, consumers should request certificates of analysis from dispensaries, ensuring that products meet safety standards and are free from heavy metal contaminants. Continued efforts to establish consistent, nationwide regulations and standards for heavy metal testing in marijuana and hemp-derived products are crucial for ensuring public safety and health.
Sources and Consequences of Heavy Metal Contamination in Marijuana
Heavy metal contamination in marijuana primarily originates from the plant’s remarkable capacity to absorb these harmful substances from its environment. Soil contamination is a key source, as the cannabis plant absorbs heavy metals naturally in the soil when it draws nutrients and water. Environmental factors, such as industrial emissions and water pollution, can also introduce heavy metals into the plant’s growth cycle. Furthermore, unregulated cultivation practices, particularly in regions where marijuana remains illegal or unmonitored, can lead to contaminated soil, water, and fertilizers, increasing the risk of heavy metal contamination in the final product.
The effects of marijuana containing heavy metals are significant and wide-ranging. Significant health concerns are posed to consumers by this pollution. When children are exposed to lead, even a small amount of it can negatively affect their cognitive development, and adults exposed to lead are more likely to develop high blood pressure, heart difficulties, and kidney damage. A carcinogen classified as cadmium can weaken bones and cause kidney illness. The effects of persistent exposure to these heavy metals may severely and permanently impact an individual’s general well-being.
Furthermore, heavy metal contamination in marijuana is not just a personal concern; it also extends to public health. With the increasing legalization of marijuana, the risk of encountering contaminated products rises. Medicinal marijuana users may be particularly vulnerable, often with preexisting health conditions. The lack of consistent regulations and testing standards across states and nations complicates the issue, making it challenging for consumers to assess product safety. Environmental concerns arise as improper disposal of contaminated plant material or cultivation waste can lead to soil and water pollution, endangering ecosystems and potentially affecting other crops and wildlife. Addressing this problem requires the implementation of stringent regulations, standardized testing procedures, and enhanced consumer awareness to ensure the safety of marijuana products while safeguarding public health and the environment.
Bottom Line
The study reveals a concerning link between marijuana use and heavy metal exposure, particularly lead and cadmium, highlighting potential health risks. With inconsistent regulations and safety standards across states, consumers should seek products from legal dispensaries and demand certificates of analysis to ensure safety. Addressing this issue requires stringent regulations and enhanced awareness to safeguard public health and the environment.
Business
New Mexico cannabis operator fined, loses license for alleged BioTrack fraud
New Mexico regulators fined a cannabis operator nearly $300,000 and revoked its license after the company allegedly created fake reports in the state’s traceability software.
The New Mexico Cannabis Control Division (CCD) accused marijuana manufacturer and retailer Golden Roots of 11 violations, according to Albuquerque Business First.
Golden Roots operates the The Cannabis Revolution Dispensary.
The majority of the violations are related to the Albuquerque company’s improper use of BioTrack, which has been New Mexico’s track-and-trace vendor since 2015.
The CCD alleges Golden Roots reported marijuana production only two months after it had received its vertically integrated license, according to Albuquerque Business First.
Because cannabis takes longer than two months to be cultivated, the CCD was suspicious of the report.
After inspecting the company’s premises, the CCD alleged Golden Roots reported cultivation, transportation and sales in BioTrack but wasn’t able to provide officers who inspected the site evidence that the operator was cultivating cannabis.
In April, the CCD revoked Golden Roots’ license and issued a $10,000 fine, according to the news outlet.
The company requested a hearing, which the regulator scheduled for Sept. 1.
At the hearing, the CCD testified that the company’s dried-cannabis weights in BioTrack were suspicious because they didn’t seem to accurately reflect how much weight marijuana loses as it dries.
Company employees also poorly accounted for why they were making adjustments in the system of up to 24 pounds of cannabis, making comments such as “bad” or “mistake” in the software, Albuquerque Business First reported.
Golden Roots was fined $298,972.05 – the amount regulators allege the company made selling products that weren’t properly accounted for in BioTrack.
The CCD has been cracking down on cannabis operators accused of selling products procured from out-of-state or not grown legally:
- Regulators alleged in August that Albuquerque dispensary Sawmill Sweet Leaf sold out-of-state products and didn’t have a license for extraction.
- Paradise Exotics Distro lost its license in July after regulators alleged the company sold products made in California.
Golden Roots was the first alleged rulebreaker in New Mexico to be asked to pay a large fine.
Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/new-mexico-cannabis-operator-fined-loses-license-for-alleged-biotrack-fraud/
Business
Marijuana companies suing US attorney general in federal prohibition challenge
Four marijuana companies, including a multistate operator, have filed a lawsuit against U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland in which they allege the federal MJ prohibition under the Controlled Substances Act is no longer constitutional.
According to the complaint, filed Thursday in U.S. District Court in Massachusetts, retailer Canna Provisions, Treevit delivery service CEO Gyasi Sellers, cultivator Wiseacre Farm and MSO Verano Holdings Corp. are all harmed by “the federal government’s unconstitutional ban on cultivating, manufacturing, distributing, or possessing intrastate marijuana.”
Verano is headquartered in Chicago but has operations in Massachusetts; the other three operators are based in Massachusetts.
The lawsuit seeks a ruling that the “Controlled Substances Act is unconstitutional as applied to the intrastate cultivation, manufacture, possession, and distribution of marijuana pursuant to state law.”
The companies want the case to go before the U.S. Supreme Court.
They hired prominent law firm Boies Schiller Flexner to represent them.
The New York-based firm’s principal is David Boies, whose former clients include Microsoft, former presidential candidate Al Gore and Elizabeth Holmes’ disgraced startup Theranos.
Similar challenges to the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA) have failed.
One such challenge led to a landmark Supreme Court decision in 2005.
In Gonzalez vs. Raich, the highest court in the United States ruled in a 6-3 decision that the commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution gave Congress the power to outlaw marijuana federally, even though state laws allow the cultivation and sale of cannabis.
In the 18 years since that ruling, 23 states and the District of Columbia have legalized adult-use marijuana and the federal government has allowed a multibillion-dollar cannabis industry to thrive.
Since both Congress and the U.S. Department of Justice, currently headed by Garland, have declined to intervene in state-licensed marijuana markets, the key facts that led to the Supreme Court’s 2005 ruling “no longer apply,” Boies said in a statement Thursday.
“The Supreme Court has since made clear that the federal government lacks the authority to regulate purely intrastate commerce,” Boies said.
“Moreover, the facts on which those precedents are based are no longer true.”
Verano President Darren Weiss said in a statement the company is “prepared to bring this case all the way to the Supreme Court in order to align federal law with how Congress has acted for years.”
While the Biden administration’s push to reschedule marijuana would help solve marijuana operators’ federal tax woes, neither rescheduling nor modest Congressional reforms such as the SAFER Banking Act “solve the fundamental issue,” Weiss added.
“The application of the CSA to lawful state-run cannabis business is an unconstitutional overreach on state sovereignty that has led to decades of harm, failed businesses, lost jobs, and unsafe working conditions.”
Business
Alabama to make another attempt Dec. 1 to award medical cannabis licenses
Alabama regulators are targeting Dec. 1 to award the first batch of medical cannabis business licenses after the agency’s first two attempts were scrapped because of scoring errors and litigation.
The first licenses will be awarded to individual cultivators, delivery providers, processors, dispensaries and state testing labs, according to the Alabama Medical Cannabis Commission (AMCC).
Then, on Dec. 12, the AMCC will award licenses for vertically integrated operations, a designation set primarily for multistate operators.
Licenses are expected to be handed out 28 days after they have been awarded, so MMJ production could begin in early January, according to the Alabama Daily News.
That means MMJ products could be available for patients around early March, an AMCC spokesperson told the media outlet.
Regulators initially awarded 21 business licenses in June, only to void them after applicants alleged inconsistencies with how the applications were scored.
Then, in August, the state awarded 24 different licenses – 19 went to June recipients – only to reverse themselves again and scratch those licenses after spurned applicants filed lawsuits.
A state judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by Chicago-based MSO Verano Holdings Corp., but another lawsuit is pending.
Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/alabama-plans-to-award-medical-cannabis-licenses-dec-1/
-
Business1 year ago
Pot Odor Does Not Justify Probable Cause for Vehicle Searches, Minnesota Court Affirms
-
Business1 year ago
New Mexico cannabis operator fined, loses license for alleged BioTrack fraud
-
Business1 year ago
Alabama to make another attempt Dec. 1 to award medical cannabis licenses
-
Business1 year ago
Washington State Pays Out $9.4 Million in Refunds Relating to Drug Convictions
-
Business1 year ago
Marijuana companies suing US attorney general in federal prohibition challenge
-
Business1 year ago
Legal Marijuana Handed A Nothing Burger From NY State
-
Business1 year ago
Can Cannabis Help Seasonal Depression
-
Blogs1 year ago
Cannabis Art Is Flourishing On Etsy