Connect with us

Business

The Illegal Cannabis ‘Whack-A-Mole’ Problem Finally Solved? – NYC to Go After Landlords That Rent to Illegal Weed Shops

Published

on

New York says why chase the mouse when you can go after the mouse trap maker instead!

Lynn C. Schulman, a councilman for New York City, filed a measure in April 2023 that would make it illegal for landlords to lease to business tenants who are engaged in the unauthorised sale of cannabis. On Thursday, June 22, the bill was sent to and passed by the entire Council after being authorised by the Committee on Public Safety. The bill will now be delivered to Mayor Eric Adams’ desk, having been given 30 days to sign it into law or veto it.

If passed, the bill would dispatch city inspectors to the thousands of alleged unlicensed cannabis outlets. The landlord might be fined between $5,000 and $10,000 if the inspector discovers that illegal cannabis is being sold on the property. The penalty can be avoided if the landlord can show evidence that eviction proceedings have started since the initial inspection. A second inspection would then happen. The measure would permit the mayor to select any state agency to inspect for such offences in addition to the state agencies already allowed to do so. Even though the imposition of fines on landlords may significantly lower the number of unauthorised cannabis outlets, several provisions of the bill may allow for these illegal stores to take advantage of a loophole.

Since Governor Kathy Hochul gave the Office of Cannabis Management (OCM) authority to enforce recently authorised by the state’s FY 2024 Budget, actions against the illegal enterprises themselves have already started in earnest. The Governor’s report that roughly $11 million worth of illegal cannabis goods have been seized so far around the state, and the passage of the bill comes at the same time. It’s been suggested for a long time that the extra step of imposing penalties on landlords who intentionally rent to unregistered operators should serve as a disincentive to the black market.

The Coexistence Challenge: Legal and Illegal Cannabis Markets

The Marijuana Regulation and Taxation Act (MRTA) established the legal cannabis industry in New York in March 2021, and the strict regulatory framework of the OCM constrains it. In contrast, the illegal cannabis industry is much larger, older, and unconstrained by the limitations placed on valid license holders, such as the payment of taxes and public safety restrictions on operating in areas of concern or selling to underaged children.

It was obvious that the two industries could not really coexist before the first state-licensed dispensaries opened their doors. Since the MRTA legalised cannabis throughout the state, the unlicensed market (also known as the legacy market, the grey market, or the black market) has opportunistically exploded. It has continued to spread at an alarming pace in contrast to the legal market, whose rollout has sputtered along under the weight of bureaucracy. Even California, which has one of the oldest adult-use (recreational) cannabis programs in the country, sees up to $8 billion in illegal sales annually, bringing in a lot more money than the legal industry does.

In response to the issue, politicians at different levels of state government have proposed measures to hold landlords accountable for leasing unlicensed cannabis businesses. The aim is to discourage landlords from entering into such leases or to impose penalties if they do. By doing so, operators would struggle to find suitable space or face eviction if they have already signed a lease. This would force illicit operators to either go completely underground, cease their operations, or consider entering the legal marketplace by obtaining a dispensary license. However, many existing operators may find this option unfeasible.

New York took the lead by prioritising justice-involved license applicants through its Conditional Adult-Use Retail Dispensary (CAURD) program. Despite this, after over two years since the passage of the Marijuana Regulation and Taxation Act (MRTA) and the submission of thousands of adult-use cannabis applications, only a limited number of legally compliant dispensaries are operational in New York. Landlords who lease to unlicensed operators cannot claim ignorance to evade fines. The proposed bill poses a significant risk of enforcement action against such landlords, especially after receiving warning letters from city agencies that undermine any claims of ignorance. Falcon Rappaport & Berkman can assist landlords in drafting leases with stronger use restrictions to discourage unlicensed cannabis sales and simplify eviction procedures in case of any illicit activities.

Challenges and Considerations

Imposing fines on commercial landlords and encouraging them to evict illicit cannabis tenants is a crucial step in the implementation of New York’s legal cannabis market. Without these measures, legitimate license holders would remain at a disadvantage, and both consumers and the general public would miss out on the advantages of a well-regulated marketplace.

However, it is essential to carefully consider the approach to fining commercial landlords or implementing other enforcement actions. A specific provision in the proposed bill, section C.1., states that written notices and potential fines apply only to properties exclusively used for selling illicit cannabis and “not occupied for any other licensed or lawful purpose.” While the bill may still result in fines for landlords of unlicensed cannabis stores, this provision means that if the premises are used for another lawful purpose alongside illicit activities, the fines may not apply. This creates a potential loophole where landlords of bodegas and convenience stores selling cannabis products could potentially avoid penalties under this bill.

We must recognise the complexity and adaptability of the unregulated market. This bill would certainly hinder significant competitors to licensed adult-use dispensaries if enacted. However, it falls short of addressing the entire unregulated cannabis market in New York. Regular reassessment of enforcement actions and implementing well-crafted policies will be necessary to foster a thriving adult-use cannabis industry in New York.

Bottom Line

Approving the measure in New York City to fine landlords and encourage evictions for unlicensed cannabis sales is a crucial step in regulating the legal cannabis market. While it addresses the issue of illicit operators, some potential loopholes and challenges need to be carefully considered. Ongoing evaluation, reassessment of enforcement actions, and well-crafted policies will be necessary to ensure the success of the legal adult-use cannabis industry and effectively curb the unlicensed market in New York.

Source: https://cannabis.net/blog/news/the-illegal-cannabis-whackamole-problem-finally-solved-nyc-to-go-after-landlords-that-rent-to-i

Business

New Mexico cannabis operator fined, loses license for alleged BioTrack fraud

Published

on

New Mexico regulators fined a cannabis operator nearly $300,000 and revoked its license after the company allegedly created fake reports in the state’s traceability software.

The New Mexico Cannabis Control Division (CCD) accused marijuana manufacturer and retailer Golden Roots of 11 violations, according to Albuquerque Business First.

Golden Roots operates the The Cannabis Revolution Dispensary.

The majority of the violations are related to the Albuquerque company’s improper use of BioTrack, which has been New Mexico’s track-and-trace vendor since 2015.

The CCD alleges Golden Roots reported marijuana production only two months after it had received its vertically integrated license, according to Albuquerque Business First.

Because cannabis takes longer than two months to be cultivated, the CCD was suspicious of the report.

After inspecting the company’s premises, the CCD alleged Golden Roots reported cultivation, transportation and sales in BioTrack but wasn’t able to provide officers who inspected the site evidence that the operator was cultivating cannabis.

In April, the CCD revoked Golden Roots’ license and issued a $10,000 fine, according to the news outlet.

The company requested a hearing, which the regulator scheduled for Sept. 1.

At the hearing, the CCD testified that the company’s dried-cannabis weights in BioTrack were suspicious because they didn’t seem to accurately reflect how much weight marijuana loses as it dries.

Company employees also poorly accounted for why they were making adjustments in the system of up to 24 pounds of cannabis, making comments such as “bad” or “mistake” in the software, Albuquerque Business First reported.

Golden Roots was fined $298,972.05 – the amount regulators allege the company made selling products that weren’t properly accounted for in BioTrack.

The CCD has been cracking down on cannabis operators accused of selling products procured from out-of-state or not grown legally:

Golden Roots was the first alleged rulebreaker in New Mexico to be asked to pay a large fine.

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/new-mexico-cannabis-operator-fined-loses-license-for-alleged-biotrack-fraud/

Continue Reading

Business

Marijuana companies suing US attorney general in federal prohibition challenge

Published

on

Four marijuana companies, including a multistate operator, have filed a lawsuit against U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland in which they allege the federal MJ prohibition under the Controlled Substances Act is no longer constitutional.

According to the complaint, filed Thursday in U.S. District Court in Massachusetts, retailer Canna Provisions, Treevit delivery service CEO Gyasi Sellers, cultivator Wiseacre Farm and MSO Verano Holdings Corp. are all harmed by “the federal government’s unconstitutional ban on cultivating, manufacturing, distributing, or possessing intrastate marijuana.”

Verano is headquartered in Chicago but has operations in Massachusetts; the other three operators are based in Massachusetts.

The lawsuit seeks a ruling that the “Controlled Substances Act is unconstitutional as applied to the intrastate cultivation, manufacture, possession, and distribution of marijuana pursuant to state law.”

The companies want the case to go before the U.S. Supreme Court.

They hired prominent law firm Boies Schiller Flexner to represent them.

The New York-based firm’s principal is David Boies, whose former clients include Microsoft, former presidential candidate Al Gore and Elizabeth Holmes’ disgraced startup Theranos.

Similar challenges to the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA) have failed.

One such challenge led to a landmark Supreme Court decision in 2005.

In Gonzalez vs. Raich, the highest court in the United States ruled in a 6-3 decision that the commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution gave Congress the power to outlaw marijuana federally, even though state laws allow the cultivation and sale of cannabis.

In the 18 years since that ruling, 23 states and the District of Columbia have legalized adult-use marijuana and the federal government has allowed a multibillion-dollar cannabis industry to thrive.

Since both Congress and the U.S. Department of Justice, currently headed by Garland, have declined to intervene in state-licensed marijuana markets, the key facts that led to the Supreme Court’s 2005 ruling “no longer apply,” Boies said in a statement Thursday.

“The Supreme Court has since made clear that the federal government lacks the authority to regulate purely intrastate commerce,” Boies said.

“Moreover, the facts on which those precedents are based are no longer true.”

Verano President Darren Weiss said in a statement the company is “prepared to bring this case all the way to the Supreme Court in order to align federal law with how Congress has acted for years.”

While the Biden administration’s push to reschedule marijuana would help solve marijuana operators’ federal tax woes, neither rescheduling nor modest Congressional reforms such as the SAFER Banking Act “solve the fundamental issue,” Weiss added.

“The application of the CSA to lawful state-run cannabis business is an unconstitutional overreach on state sovereignty that has led to decades of harm, failed businesses, lost jobs, and unsafe working conditions.”

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/marijuana-companies-suing-us-attorney-general-to-overturn-federal-prohibition/

Continue Reading

Business

Alabama to make another attempt Dec. 1 to award medical cannabis licenses

Published

on

Alabama regulators are targeting Dec. 1 to award the first batch of medical cannabis business licenses after the agency’s first two attempts were scrapped because of scoring errors and litigation.

The first licenses will be awarded to individual cultivators, delivery providers, processors, dispensaries and state testing labs, according to the Alabama Medical Cannabis Commission (AMCC).

Then, on Dec. 12, the AMCC will award licenses for vertically integrated operations, a designation set primarily for multistate operators.

Licenses are expected to be handed out 28 days after they have been awarded, so MMJ production could begin in early January, according to the Alabama Daily News.

That means MMJ products could be available for patients around early March, an AMCC spokesperson told the media outlet.

Regulators initially awarded 21 business licenses in June, only to void them after applicants alleged inconsistencies with how the applications were scored.

Then, in August, the state awarded 24 different licenses – 19 went to June recipients – only to reverse themselves again and scratch those licenses after spurned applicants filed lawsuits.

A state judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by Chicago-based MSO Verano Holdings Corp., but another lawsuit is pending.

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/alabama-plans-to-award-medical-cannabis-licenses-dec-1/

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 420 Reports Marijuana News & Information Website | Reefer News | Cannabis News