Connect with us

Business

Shrooms Legalized Before Weed? – FDA Posts Guidelines for Doing Research on Psychedelics

Published

on

Psilocybin and MDMA may see a faster past to legalization than cannabis

An important step has been taken toward the acceptance and legitimacy of psychedelic therapies with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) release of a ground-breaking draft guidance addressing the special issues investigating psychedelics for therapeutic reasons. This change occurs when municipalities and states nationwide push more for the study and control of drugs like psilocybin and MDMA. The FDA’s draft guidance provides researchers with a framework to design clinical trials that yield interpretable results, supporting the development of psychedelic medicines. As the draft undergoes a public comment period, stakeholders can shape the final guidance, ensuring it incorporates diverse perspectives and expertise. As the therapeutic potential of psychedelics continues to receive attention, this advice paves the way for a new era of scientific investigation and the potential creation of novel treatments for mental health illnesses.

The FDA’s Draft Guidance on Psychedelic Research:

The release of the FDA’s draft guidance on psychedelic research marks a significant milestone in mental health treatment. The 14-page document provides researchers with a comprehensive framework to conduct studies on psychedelic drugs, which have shown initial promise in treating mood, anxiety, and substance use disorders. Covering various aspects of drug development, the guidance offers insights into trial conduct, data collection, subject safety, and new drug application requirements. By outlining the unique challenges inherent in designing psychedelic drug development programs, the FDA aims to assist researchers in designing studies that yield reliable and interpretable results, supporting future drug applications.

Researchers exploring the therapeutic potential of psychedelics face distinct considerations compared to traditional pharmaceutical research. The draft guidance emphasizes the psychoactive nature of many psychedelics, which sets them apart from conventional medicines. This characteristic increases the potential for abuse and necessitates careful consideration throughout drug development. Moreover, the guidance acknowledges the regulatory complexities associated with entheogenic plants and fungi like psilocybin, classified as Schedule I drugs. Researchers must navigate a more complex registration process with the DEA to obtain these substances for study purposes. The FDA’s guidance provides recommendations on addressing these regulatory challenges effectively.

The draft guidance also underscores the importance of ensuring subject safety during psychedelic research. Given the unique characteristics of psychedelics, researchers must develop safety monitoring strategies tailored to these substances. Additionally, the guidance highlights the significance of characterizing dose-response relationships and evaluating the durability of treatment effects. These considerations help establish the effectiveness and long-term impact of psychedelic therapies. Recognizing the integral role of psychotherapy in psychedelic drug development, the guidance advises researchers to carefully integrate psychotherapy into psychedelic-assisted treatments while minimizing bias in subsequent therapy sessions. By addressing these factors, the FDA aims to enhance the quality and validity of research outcomes in psychedelic-assisted therapy.

Unique Considerations in Psychedelic Research:

The FDA’s draft guidance on psychedelic research sheds light on the unique considerations researchers must address when studying psychedelic substances. A significant aspect highlighted in the guidance is the psychoactive nature of these compounds. Unlike traditional medications, psychedelics induce profound alterations in perception, cognition, and mood, necessitating careful management of the acute experience during clinical trials. Researchers must develop innovative methodologies and measures to capture the therapeutic effects of psychedelics while accounting for the subjective and context-dependent nature of the psychedelic experience. This entails designing studies that can effectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of these substances in a controlled and standardized manner.

In addition to the psychoactive effects, the regulatory landscape surrounding psychedelic substances presents a distinct challenge for researchers. Entheogenic plants and fungi, such as psilocybin, fall under Schedule I classification according to the Controlled Substances Act. This classification imposes stringent regulations and complicates obtaining these substances for research purposes. The FDA provides researchers with recommendations and guidance on navigating the regulatory hurdles associated with Schedule I substances, ensuring compliance with legal and ethical requirements while facilitating access to these compounds for research.

The guidance emphasizes the importance of subject safety in psychedelic research. Given the unique effects and potential risks associated with psychedelics, researchers must establish robust safety protocols and evaluate the risk-benefit profile of their studies. The guidance emphasizes the need for comprehensive safety monitoring throughout the treatment process, including pre-session preparation, administration, and post-session integration and support.

The Impact of FDA Guidance on Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy

The release of the FDA’s draft guidance on psychedelic research carries significant implications for the emerging field of psychedelic-assisted therapy. With growing interest and promising results, this therapeutic approach combines the administration of psychedelics with psychotherapy to treat various mental health conditions. The FDA’s guidance acknowledges this innovative treatment modality and offers considerations specifically tailored to conducting clinical trials in psychedelic-assisted therapy.

One key focus of the guidance is the importance of maintaining treatment blinding in clinical trials. Since therapists monitoring the sessions can often discern the treatment assignment based on the subject’s behavior, it is crucial to minimize potential biases. The guidance suggests that in-session monitors should not be involved in post-session psychotherapy to prevent their knowledge of the treatment from influencing subsequent therapy sessions. By implementing strategies to ensure blinding, researchers can uphold the integrity of the trial and obtain more reliable and unbiased results.

Additionally, the FDA’s guidance underscores the significance of exploring the role of psychotherapy within psychedelic-assisted therapy. Psychedelics enhance the therapeutic process by facilitating introspection, emotional breakthroughs, and personal insights. Understanding the interplay between the psychedelic experience and psychotherapy is vital for optimizing treatment outcomes. The guidance encourages researchers to incorporate appropriate psychotherapeutic techniques and develop protocols that effectively integrate the unique effects of psychedelics into the therapeutic process.

Moreover, the draft guidance emphasizes the importance of characterizing dose-response relationships and treatment durability in psychedelic-assisted therapy. Psychedelics often exhibit dose-dependent effects, meaning the therapeutic outcomes may vary based on the dosage. Researchers are encouraged to investigate the optimal dosage range for medicinal purposes. Additionally, evaluating the durability of treatment effects is crucial to determine the long-term benefits and sustainability of psychedelic-assisted therapy. By comprehensively studying dose-response relationships and treatment durability, researchers can refine treatment protocols and better understand these substances’ therapeutic potential.

Bottom Line

The FDA’s release of draft guidance on psychedelic research signifies a significant step forward in understanding the therapeutic potential of these substances. The guidance document aims to assist researchers in designing clinical trials that meet the evidentiary standards required for drug development. As interest in psychedelics continues to grow and lawmakers advocate for reform, the FDA’s guidance provides a roadmap for conducting research and advancing the field of psychedelic-assisted therapy. With continued research, legislative support, and regulatory guidance, psychedelic medicines have the potential to revolutionize mental health treatments and provide relief for individuals suffering from mood disorders, anxiety, and addiction.

Source: https://cannabis.net/blog/news/shrooms-legalized-before-weed-fda-posts-guidelines-for-doing-research-on-psychedelics

Business

New Mexico cannabis operator fined, loses license for alleged BioTrack fraud

Published

on

New Mexico regulators fined a cannabis operator nearly $300,000 and revoked its license after the company allegedly created fake reports in the state’s traceability software.

The New Mexico Cannabis Control Division (CCD) accused marijuana manufacturer and retailer Golden Roots of 11 violations, according to Albuquerque Business First.

Golden Roots operates the The Cannabis Revolution Dispensary.

The majority of the violations are related to the Albuquerque company’s improper use of BioTrack, which has been New Mexico’s track-and-trace vendor since 2015.

The CCD alleges Golden Roots reported marijuana production only two months after it had received its vertically integrated license, according to Albuquerque Business First.

Because cannabis takes longer than two months to be cultivated, the CCD was suspicious of the report.

After inspecting the company’s premises, the CCD alleged Golden Roots reported cultivation, transportation and sales in BioTrack but wasn’t able to provide officers who inspected the site evidence that the operator was cultivating cannabis.

In April, the CCD revoked Golden Roots’ license and issued a $10,000 fine, according to the news outlet.

The company requested a hearing, which the regulator scheduled for Sept. 1.

At the hearing, the CCD testified that the company’s dried-cannabis weights in BioTrack were suspicious because they didn’t seem to accurately reflect how much weight marijuana loses as it dries.

Company employees also poorly accounted for why they were making adjustments in the system of up to 24 pounds of cannabis, making comments such as “bad” or “mistake” in the software, Albuquerque Business First reported.

Golden Roots was fined $298,972.05 – the amount regulators allege the company made selling products that weren’t properly accounted for in BioTrack.

The CCD has been cracking down on cannabis operators accused of selling products procured from out-of-state or not grown legally:

Golden Roots was the first alleged rulebreaker in New Mexico to be asked to pay a large fine.

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/new-mexico-cannabis-operator-fined-loses-license-for-alleged-biotrack-fraud/

Continue Reading

Business

Marijuana companies suing US attorney general in federal prohibition challenge

Published

on

Four marijuana companies, including a multistate operator, have filed a lawsuit against U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland in which they allege the federal MJ prohibition under the Controlled Substances Act is no longer constitutional.

According to the complaint, filed Thursday in U.S. District Court in Massachusetts, retailer Canna Provisions, Treevit delivery service CEO Gyasi Sellers, cultivator Wiseacre Farm and MSO Verano Holdings Corp. are all harmed by “the federal government’s unconstitutional ban on cultivating, manufacturing, distributing, or possessing intrastate marijuana.”

Verano is headquartered in Chicago but has operations in Massachusetts; the other three operators are based in Massachusetts.

The lawsuit seeks a ruling that the “Controlled Substances Act is unconstitutional as applied to the intrastate cultivation, manufacture, possession, and distribution of marijuana pursuant to state law.”

The companies want the case to go before the U.S. Supreme Court.

They hired prominent law firm Boies Schiller Flexner to represent them.

The New York-based firm’s principal is David Boies, whose former clients include Microsoft, former presidential candidate Al Gore and Elizabeth Holmes’ disgraced startup Theranos.

Similar challenges to the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA) have failed.

One such challenge led to a landmark Supreme Court decision in 2005.

In Gonzalez vs. Raich, the highest court in the United States ruled in a 6-3 decision that the commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution gave Congress the power to outlaw marijuana federally, even though state laws allow the cultivation and sale of cannabis.

In the 18 years since that ruling, 23 states and the District of Columbia have legalized adult-use marijuana and the federal government has allowed a multibillion-dollar cannabis industry to thrive.

Since both Congress and the U.S. Department of Justice, currently headed by Garland, have declined to intervene in state-licensed marijuana markets, the key facts that led to the Supreme Court’s 2005 ruling “no longer apply,” Boies said in a statement Thursday.

“The Supreme Court has since made clear that the federal government lacks the authority to regulate purely intrastate commerce,” Boies said.

“Moreover, the facts on which those precedents are based are no longer true.”

Verano President Darren Weiss said in a statement the company is “prepared to bring this case all the way to the Supreme Court in order to align federal law with how Congress has acted for years.”

While the Biden administration’s push to reschedule marijuana would help solve marijuana operators’ federal tax woes, neither rescheduling nor modest Congressional reforms such as the SAFER Banking Act “solve the fundamental issue,” Weiss added.

“The application of the CSA to lawful state-run cannabis business is an unconstitutional overreach on state sovereignty that has led to decades of harm, failed businesses, lost jobs, and unsafe working conditions.”

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/marijuana-companies-suing-us-attorney-general-to-overturn-federal-prohibition/

Continue Reading

Business

Alabama to make another attempt Dec. 1 to award medical cannabis licenses

Published

on

Alabama regulators are targeting Dec. 1 to award the first batch of medical cannabis business licenses after the agency’s first two attempts were scrapped because of scoring errors and litigation.

The first licenses will be awarded to individual cultivators, delivery providers, processors, dispensaries and state testing labs, according to the Alabama Medical Cannabis Commission (AMCC).

Then, on Dec. 12, the AMCC will award licenses for vertically integrated operations, a designation set primarily for multistate operators.

Licenses are expected to be handed out 28 days after they have been awarded, so MMJ production could begin in early January, according to the Alabama Daily News.

That means MMJ products could be available for patients around early March, an AMCC spokesperson told the media outlet.

Regulators initially awarded 21 business licenses in June, only to void them after applicants alleged inconsistencies with how the applications were scored.

Then, in August, the state awarded 24 different licenses – 19 went to June recipients – only to reverse themselves again and scratch those licenses after spurned applicants filed lawsuits.

A state judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by Chicago-based MSO Verano Holdings Corp., but another lawsuit is pending.

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/alabama-plans-to-award-medical-cannabis-licenses-dec-1/

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 420 Reports Marijuana News & Information Website | Reefer News | Cannabis News