Connect with us

Government

New Massachusetts marijuana reform law targets diversity, municipal fees

Published

on

After Massachusetts’ governor recently signed sweeping legislation focused on promoting diversity and equity in the state’s $2 billion marijuana industry, Ava Callender Concepcion of the Cannabis Control Commission told reporters she was “shaking with relief and happiness.”

The marijuana-focused law covers a broad range of issues, from creating a Social Equity Trust Fund to help entrepreneurs raise capital to keeping a lid on the controversial fees levied by municipalities on local cannabis businesses.

The reform package also allows municipalities to pass bylaws or to vote on whether to allow cannabis consumption lounges as well as permitting businesses to open such venues in localities  previously approved through a pilot program.

“This is the most comprehensive piece of legislation on cannabis since the establishment of the Cannabis Control Commission,” Concepcion said.

But some of the state’s industry executives argue that the new law could have gone further in providing business opportunities to those impacted by the war on drugs.

Social Equity Trust Fund

Massachusetts was the first state to implement a social equity program for its cannabis industry as part of the state’s new adult-use market in 2018, according to the 2022 Equity Report issued by the Minority Cannabis Business Association (MCBA).

Today, 14 other states have  implemented or are planning their own programs.

The first social equity iteration in Massachusetts focused on providing delivery, courier and consumption-site licenses exclusively to “minorities and other marginalized communities,” the MCBA noted.

The program also helped entrepreneurs navigate the license applications and lowered or eliminated certain fees.

The new law builds on those steps.

Now, 15% of cannabis taxes and fees will be allocated for Massachusetts’ new Social Equity Trust Fund, which will disperse grants and loans to entrepreneurs harmed by the war on drugs.

The fund will be sizable: The state’s 2023 budget allocated $196,198,415 from the Marijuana Regulation Fund to various programs and initiatives. In fiscal year 2022, the fund collected $156,669,255.

So far, it’s unclear how that money will be spread out among entrepreneurs, said Ulysses Youngblood, the president of Worcester-based marijuana retailer Major Bloom.

In 2007, Youngblood said he was expelled from Assumption University in Worcester after authorities suspected he possessed marijuana.

Four months later, on his 20th birthday, he said he endured police brutality while being arrested at a house party he hosted after a noise complaint. He was charged with possessing alcohol as a minor and keeping a noisy and disorderly home. The case was dismissed.

When Youngblood decided to start a cannabis business, he qualified for the CCC’s economic empowerment program, which granted him an exclusive delivery license and expedited the process to acquire manufacturing and retail licenses.

But he still took on about $60,000 in personal debt and raised an additional $1.2 million to get the businesses operational, which includes a 6,000-square-foot manufacturing facility.

He said that the new fund is a good first step to help entrepreneurs get started.

But he’s skeptical there will be enough money to go around to all those deserving of the assistance.

Youngblood estimated that even nonmanufacturing companies require $20,000-$100,000 in startup costs.

”It’s just that we’re talking about generations of oppression,” he said. “Generations. A state fund is great, but it’s just not going to be enough.

“We’re dealing with systemic issues for hundreds of years. So, 10 or 15, or a handful of businesses (receiving funds) looks great on paper. However, there needs to be a bigger impact.”

Exclusive licensing

A case in point: Delivery services – which have been set aside exclusively for social equity licenses in Massachusetts – have very slim margins, Youngblood said.

Operators also complain that they are overregulated by costly requirements such as having two employees per vehicle – another issue that many say must be addressed to keep current social equity businesses afloat.

“If you want an equitable license, you can’t just carve out one license type,” Youngblood said.

“You have to look at all license types to make it fair, because you still have those MSOs (multistate operators) at the top producing and controlling pricing.

“But just speaking off the history and my own experience being in an equity program, it’s not enough,” he added. “You need more cultivators and producers.”

Host community agreements

The new legislation also gives the CCC more oversight over so-called host community agreements (HCAs), which are negotiated between municipalities and local cannabis businesses.

While the CCC has until November 2023 to plan how it will oversee the contracts, so-called community impact fee payments will be limited to 3% of a company’s sales.

In a 2021 analysis, cannabis policy researcher Jeffrey Moyer found:

  • There was a lack of consistency among these agreements.
  • The highly competitive cannabis industry was at risk of being exploited by municipal governments that far exceeded the 3% recommendation and couldn’t always account for where the money went.

In September 2021, for example, a former mayor of Fall River was sentenced to six years in prison after being convicted of extorting hundreds of thousands of dollars from hopeful marijuana entrepreneurs.

But if or how the new law will impact existing HCAs is unknown, according to Steve Smirti, the communications director for the Medford mayor’s office.

“The city signed its final retail HCA earlier this month and we do not foresee having to renegotiate the terms of the contracts absent a clear determination by a court or other legal authority that it is required to do so,” he told MJBizDaily via email in August.

Under that agreement, signed with retailer Victory Gardens, Medford will collect 3% of the company’s gross sales each quarter.

Victory Gardens also agreed to donate $50,000 annually to groups that support local veterans.

In addition, the company agreed to renovate an existing Veterans of Foreign Wars facility to house its new retail shop and a space for local veterans.

The five-year agreement is the city’s third HCA with a marijuana retailer.

“It would seem counterproductive to have legislation impact previously signed agreements, as those were negotiated and signed in good faith under the laws in existence at the time with both involved parties,” Smirti wrote.

Is it too late?

Shaleen Title, a former Massachusetts cannabis commissioner and the founder of drug policy think tank Parabola Center, celebrated the achievement.

“Passing the new legislation was a massive four-year effort by a broad coalition,” she told MJBizDaily via email. “The effort was led by social equity entrepreneurs themselves.

“It took time, but eventually the changes were supported by all of the state cannabis regulators and many influential equity-focused organizations.”

But Youngblood and Kobie Evans, a co-owner of Boston-based marijuana retailer Pure Oasis, wondered if that four-year process means that it’s too late for the new legislative efforts to have a meaningful impact on equity entrepreneurs in Massachusetts.

“The hard part is that it’s 2022,” Evans said. “We opened two years ago, so we’re kind of far out in terms of the life cycle of cannabis.

“Most of the people who were going to get into it have already gone through the application process.”

But he said the efforts might have more far-reaching impact and could influence federal policy or other state legalization efforts in the future.

“I think it is valuable though on a national level,” he added. “It is valuable for other cities and states to look at what’s possible.”

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/new-massachusetts-marijuana-reform-law-targets-diversity-municipal-fees/

Business

New Mexico cannabis operator fined, loses license for alleged BioTrack fraud

Published

on

New Mexico regulators fined a cannabis operator nearly $300,000 and revoked its license after the company allegedly created fake reports in the state’s traceability software.

The New Mexico Cannabis Control Division (CCD) accused marijuana manufacturer and retailer Golden Roots of 11 violations, according to Albuquerque Business First.

Golden Roots operates the The Cannabis Revolution Dispensary.

The majority of the violations are related to the Albuquerque company’s improper use of BioTrack, which has been New Mexico’s track-and-trace vendor since 2015.

The CCD alleges Golden Roots reported marijuana production only two months after it had received its vertically integrated license, according to Albuquerque Business First.

Because cannabis takes longer than two months to be cultivated, the CCD was suspicious of the report.

After inspecting the company’s premises, the CCD alleged Golden Roots reported cultivation, transportation and sales in BioTrack but wasn’t able to provide officers who inspected the site evidence that the operator was cultivating cannabis.

In April, the CCD revoked Golden Roots’ license and issued a $10,000 fine, according to the news outlet.

The company requested a hearing, which the regulator scheduled for Sept. 1.

At the hearing, the CCD testified that the company’s dried-cannabis weights in BioTrack were suspicious because they didn’t seem to accurately reflect how much weight marijuana loses as it dries.

Company employees also poorly accounted for why they were making adjustments in the system of up to 24 pounds of cannabis, making comments such as “bad” or “mistake” in the software, Albuquerque Business First reported.

Golden Roots was fined $298,972.05 – the amount regulators allege the company made selling products that weren’t properly accounted for in BioTrack.

The CCD has been cracking down on cannabis operators accused of selling products procured from out-of-state or not grown legally:

Golden Roots was the first alleged rulebreaker in New Mexico to be asked to pay a large fine.

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/new-mexico-cannabis-operator-fined-loses-license-for-alleged-biotrack-fraud/

Continue Reading

Business

Marijuana companies suing US attorney general in federal prohibition challenge

Published

on

Four marijuana companies, including a multistate operator, have filed a lawsuit against U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland in which they allege the federal MJ prohibition under the Controlled Substances Act is no longer constitutional.

According to the complaint, filed Thursday in U.S. District Court in Massachusetts, retailer Canna Provisions, Treevit delivery service CEO Gyasi Sellers, cultivator Wiseacre Farm and MSO Verano Holdings Corp. are all harmed by “the federal government’s unconstitutional ban on cultivating, manufacturing, distributing, or possessing intrastate marijuana.”

Verano is headquartered in Chicago but has operations in Massachusetts; the other three operators are based in Massachusetts.

The lawsuit seeks a ruling that the “Controlled Substances Act is unconstitutional as applied to the intrastate cultivation, manufacture, possession, and distribution of marijuana pursuant to state law.”

The companies want the case to go before the U.S. Supreme Court.

They hired prominent law firm Boies Schiller Flexner to represent them.

The New York-based firm’s principal is David Boies, whose former clients include Microsoft, former presidential candidate Al Gore and Elizabeth Holmes’ disgraced startup Theranos.

Similar challenges to the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA) have failed.

One such challenge led to a landmark Supreme Court decision in 2005.

In Gonzalez vs. Raich, the highest court in the United States ruled in a 6-3 decision that the commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution gave Congress the power to outlaw marijuana federally, even though state laws allow the cultivation and sale of cannabis.

In the 18 years since that ruling, 23 states and the District of Columbia have legalized adult-use marijuana and the federal government has allowed a multibillion-dollar cannabis industry to thrive.

Since both Congress and the U.S. Department of Justice, currently headed by Garland, have declined to intervene in state-licensed marijuana markets, the key facts that led to the Supreme Court’s 2005 ruling “no longer apply,” Boies said in a statement Thursday.

“The Supreme Court has since made clear that the federal government lacks the authority to regulate purely intrastate commerce,” Boies said.

“Moreover, the facts on which those precedents are based are no longer true.”

Verano President Darren Weiss said in a statement the company is “prepared to bring this case all the way to the Supreme Court in order to align federal law with how Congress has acted for years.”

While the Biden administration’s push to reschedule marijuana would help solve marijuana operators’ federal tax woes, neither rescheduling nor modest Congressional reforms such as the SAFER Banking Act “solve the fundamental issue,” Weiss added.

“The application of the CSA to lawful state-run cannabis business is an unconstitutional overreach on state sovereignty that has led to decades of harm, failed businesses, lost jobs, and unsafe working conditions.”

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/marijuana-companies-suing-us-attorney-general-to-overturn-federal-prohibition/

Continue Reading

Business

Alabama to make another attempt Dec. 1 to award medical cannabis licenses

Published

on

Alabama regulators are targeting Dec. 1 to award the first batch of medical cannabis business licenses after the agency’s first two attempts were scrapped because of scoring errors and litigation.

The first licenses will be awarded to individual cultivators, delivery providers, processors, dispensaries and state testing labs, according to the Alabama Medical Cannabis Commission (AMCC).

Then, on Dec. 12, the AMCC will award licenses for vertically integrated operations, a designation set primarily for multistate operators.

Licenses are expected to be handed out 28 days after they have been awarded, so MMJ production could begin in early January, according to the Alabama Daily News.

That means MMJ products could be available for patients around early March, an AMCC spokesperson told the media outlet.

Regulators initially awarded 21 business licenses in June, only to void them after applicants alleged inconsistencies with how the applications were scored.

Then, in August, the state awarded 24 different licenses – 19 went to June recipients – only to reverse themselves again and scratch those licenses after spurned applicants filed lawsuits.

A state judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by Chicago-based MSO Verano Holdings Corp., but another lawsuit is pending.

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/alabama-plans-to-award-medical-cannabis-licenses-dec-1/

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 420 Reports Marijuana News & Information Website | Reefer News | Cannabis News