Connect with us

Business

Canada’s crackdown on some cannabis extracts could cost industry millions

Published

on

Health Canada has begun asking some federally licensed marijuana companies to stop selling certain ingestible cannabis products the regulatory agency says are incorrectly classified and labeled as “extracts” rather than “edibles,” MJBizDaily has learned.

The move could cost cannabis businesses millions of dollars, Canadian industry sources say, because the products in question – including some lozenges and chewable extracts – are increasingly popular among consumers.

Executives are puzzled over Health Canada’s timing, especially since some of the products in question have been on the market for years.

The apparent crackdown also comes at a sensitive time for the Canadian marijuana industry, as most publicly traded cannabis producers are still losing money.

From a packaging perspective, the distinction is important because any cannabis product classified as an “extract” has 100 times more allowable THC per package than a product classified as an “edible,” making it more appealing to certain consumers.

One letter sent to a licensee by Health Canada, obtained by MJBizDaily, requests the company to halt the sale of the flagged products.

The letter is from Anika Stella Chasse, acting director general of the Compliance Directorate in Health Canada’s Controlled Substances and Cannabis Branch.

Despite blowing the whistle, Health Canada stopped short of ordering the company to recall the products, which have been on store shelves and available to consumers.

It isn’t known if Health Canada sent a noncompliance letter to every company selling the products now under federal scrutiny or only select producers.

Health Canada did not immediately answer MJBizDaily queries for comment.

In the letter seen by MJBizDaily, the agency said that, “upon further review of the products in question, Health Canada has assessed that this product is edible cannabis and, consequently, it contains a quantity of THC that exceeds the allowable limit of 10 mg per immediate container.”

The letter goes on to define “extract,” “edible” and “food.”

“Health Canada has determined that (the products in question) are consumed in the same manner as food, and therefore fit the definition of edible cannabis,” the Health Canada letter notes.

The company that shared the letter with MJBizDaily requested anonymity.

The rules

Unlike extracts, cannabis products classified as edibles are limited to 10 milligrams of THC per package.

Shane Morris, founder of Ottawa-based Morris & Associates Consulting, noted that Schedule 4 of the Cannabis Act identifies the classifications of marijuana that can be sold.

“For all ‘cannabis extracts.’ the THC quantity must not exceed 1,000 milligrams per immediate container. This is 100 times more THC per pack than what is permitted in an ‘edible’ class of cannabis product,” he said.

All new cannabis products in Canada must follow the government’s so-called Notice of New Cannabis Product (NNCP) process, which requires licensed producers to notify Health Canada months in advance of new products.

In fact, some ingestible extracts that contain significant amounts of THC have been on the market for years.

In August 2021, New Brunswick-based cannabis producer Organigram launched its “Jolts” ingestible extracts, saying at the time it was “Canada’s first flavored high potency THC lozenge” containing “a total of 100 mg per pack.”

Organigram did not immediately respond to requests for comment from MJBizDaily, and it’s unknown if the company received a warning letter from Health Canada.

A product that has undergone the NNCP process doesn’t necessarily mean it received Health Canada’s seal of approval.

Rather, the process effectively gives the regulatory agency a heads-up ahead of time regarding all new products.

It also gives Health Canada an opportunity to address any regulatory issues with companies before millions are spent on production and marketing.

Sources at one company, which did receive a noncompliance letter, said Health Canada did not voice any concerns with the classification of the product until the regulator’s letter arrived this month.

Millions at stake

If all ingestible extracts and lozenges are pulled from the Canadian market, the industry could lose out on tens of millions of dollars in sales per year, industry sources say.

Morris estimates that in December 2022 alone, the Ontario Cannabis Store sold roughly 942,000 Canadian dollars ($600,000) worth of the “loophole” ingestible extracts in wholesale orders and via its online consumer store.

“Assuming Ontario sells approx. 40% all cannabis in Canada, then on an annual basis this would mean the retail value of these products would be approximately CA$33.9 million per annum in the recreational market, not inducing medical or Quebec where these new products are not sold,” he said via email.

Morris previously worked in operations at the Canadian Food Inspection Agency and the Public Health Agency of Canada.

He later worked at licensed producers Aurora Cannabis and Hexo Corp.

Sherry Boodram, CEO and co-founder of Toronto-based regulatory consulting firm CannDelta, said licensees agree that reducing the public health risks associated with cannabis products should always be a priority.

Boodram also said cannabis companies found creative ways to manufacture and market products to compete with the illicit market.

“For Health Canada to suddenly bring down the hammer on how these products are being classified, especially three years after (Cannabis) 2.0 products became legal, will undoubtedly cause business losses during a time when cannabis companies are already struggling,” she said.

“This could ultimately lead consumers to turn to the illicit market as legal, regulated (and tax-paying) companies go insolvent because of Health Canada’s inconsistent regulatory compliance interpretation and enforcement actions (or inactions).”

Another industry executive, who requested anonymity, said it is “highly ineffective” for Canada’s federal regulator to raise concerns for a classification of products that have been on the market for more than 18 months in some cases and “followed and met all regulatory requirements and made extensive financial investments.”

“This sudden position of concern is counter to the spirit of the Cannabis Act and will undoubtedly move consumers back to the illicit market – which operates without the safety and oversight the legal market offers,” the executive added.

“While the rules are purportedly being changed – there is minimal direction, we’re unclear where this is coming from and sense a misguided interpretation of what is deemed risky to Canadians.”

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/canadas-crackdown-on-some-cannabis-extracts-could-cost-industry-millions/

Business

New Mexico cannabis operator fined, loses license for alleged BioTrack fraud

Published

on

New Mexico regulators fined a cannabis operator nearly $300,000 and revoked its license after the company allegedly created fake reports in the state’s traceability software.

The New Mexico Cannabis Control Division (CCD) accused marijuana manufacturer and retailer Golden Roots of 11 violations, according to Albuquerque Business First.

Golden Roots operates the The Cannabis Revolution Dispensary.

The majority of the violations are related to the Albuquerque company’s improper use of BioTrack, which has been New Mexico’s track-and-trace vendor since 2015.

The CCD alleges Golden Roots reported marijuana production only two months after it had received its vertically integrated license, according to Albuquerque Business First.

Because cannabis takes longer than two months to be cultivated, the CCD was suspicious of the report.

After inspecting the company’s premises, the CCD alleged Golden Roots reported cultivation, transportation and sales in BioTrack but wasn’t able to provide officers who inspected the site evidence that the operator was cultivating cannabis.

In April, the CCD revoked Golden Roots’ license and issued a $10,000 fine, according to the news outlet.

The company requested a hearing, which the regulator scheduled for Sept. 1.

At the hearing, the CCD testified that the company’s dried-cannabis weights in BioTrack were suspicious because they didn’t seem to accurately reflect how much weight marijuana loses as it dries.

Company employees also poorly accounted for why they were making adjustments in the system of up to 24 pounds of cannabis, making comments such as “bad” or “mistake” in the software, Albuquerque Business First reported.

Golden Roots was fined $298,972.05 – the amount regulators allege the company made selling products that weren’t properly accounted for in BioTrack.

The CCD has been cracking down on cannabis operators accused of selling products procured from out-of-state or not grown legally:

Golden Roots was the first alleged rulebreaker in New Mexico to be asked to pay a large fine.

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/new-mexico-cannabis-operator-fined-loses-license-for-alleged-biotrack-fraud/

Continue Reading

Business

Marijuana companies suing US attorney general in federal prohibition challenge

Published

on

Four marijuana companies, including a multistate operator, have filed a lawsuit against U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland in which they allege the federal MJ prohibition under the Controlled Substances Act is no longer constitutional.

According to the complaint, filed Thursday in U.S. District Court in Massachusetts, retailer Canna Provisions, Treevit delivery service CEO Gyasi Sellers, cultivator Wiseacre Farm and MSO Verano Holdings Corp. are all harmed by “the federal government’s unconstitutional ban on cultivating, manufacturing, distributing, or possessing intrastate marijuana.”

Verano is headquartered in Chicago but has operations in Massachusetts; the other three operators are based in Massachusetts.

The lawsuit seeks a ruling that the “Controlled Substances Act is unconstitutional as applied to the intrastate cultivation, manufacture, possession, and distribution of marijuana pursuant to state law.”

The companies want the case to go before the U.S. Supreme Court.

They hired prominent law firm Boies Schiller Flexner to represent them.

The New York-based firm’s principal is David Boies, whose former clients include Microsoft, former presidential candidate Al Gore and Elizabeth Holmes’ disgraced startup Theranos.

Similar challenges to the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA) have failed.

One such challenge led to a landmark Supreme Court decision in 2005.

In Gonzalez vs. Raich, the highest court in the United States ruled in a 6-3 decision that the commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution gave Congress the power to outlaw marijuana federally, even though state laws allow the cultivation and sale of cannabis.

In the 18 years since that ruling, 23 states and the District of Columbia have legalized adult-use marijuana and the federal government has allowed a multibillion-dollar cannabis industry to thrive.

Since both Congress and the U.S. Department of Justice, currently headed by Garland, have declined to intervene in state-licensed marijuana markets, the key facts that led to the Supreme Court’s 2005 ruling “no longer apply,” Boies said in a statement Thursday.

“The Supreme Court has since made clear that the federal government lacks the authority to regulate purely intrastate commerce,” Boies said.

“Moreover, the facts on which those precedents are based are no longer true.”

Verano President Darren Weiss said in a statement the company is “prepared to bring this case all the way to the Supreme Court in order to align federal law with how Congress has acted for years.”

While the Biden administration’s push to reschedule marijuana would help solve marijuana operators’ federal tax woes, neither rescheduling nor modest Congressional reforms such as the SAFER Banking Act “solve the fundamental issue,” Weiss added.

“The application of the CSA to lawful state-run cannabis business is an unconstitutional overreach on state sovereignty that has led to decades of harm, failed businesses, lost jobs, and unsafe working conditions.”

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/marijuana-companies-suing-us-attorney-general-to-overturn-federal-prohibition/

Continue Reading

Business

Alabama to make another attempt Dec. 1 to award medical cannabis licenses

Published

on

Alabama regulators are targeting Dec. 1 to award the first batch of medical cannabis business licenses after the agency’s first two attempts were scrapped because of scoring errors and litigation.

The first licenses will be awarded to individual cultivators, delivery providers, processors, dispensaries and state testing labs, according to the Alabama Medical Cannabis Commission (AMCC).

Then, on Dec. 12, the AMCC will award licenses for vertically integrated operations, a designation set primarily for multistate operators.

Licenses are expected to be handed out 28 days after they have been awarded, so MMJ production could begin in early January, according to the Alabama Daily News.

That means MMJ products could be available for patients around early March, an AMCC spokesperson told the media outlet.

Regulators initially awarded 21 business licenses in June, only to void them after applicants alleged inconsistencies with how the applications were scored.

Then, in August, the state awarded 24 different licenses – 19 went to June recipients – only to reverse themselves again and scratch those licenses after spurned applicants filed lawsuits.

A state judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by Chicago-based MSO Verano Holdings Corp., but another lawsuit is pending.

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/alabama-plans-to-award-medical-cannabis-licenses-dec-1/

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 420 Reports Marijuana News & Information Website | Reefer News | Cannabis News