Connect with us

Business

Can You Sue Facebook If You Get Scammed Online? – Zuckerberg Sued for Aiding and Abetting Fraud in JuicyFields Case

Published

on

Swedish attorney goes after Mark Zuckerberg for marijuana investment fraud scheme

Regarding the marijuana Ponzi scam Juicy Fields, Swedish attorney Lars Olofsson has filed a class action lawsuit against Facebook and Instagram’s parent company Meta (META). The scam affected over 800 persons across about 80 countries,  particularly in Spain, France, Portugal, Germany, the Netherlands, and Malta, and each one of them is in support of the ongoing legal battle.

The lawsuit alleges that Facebook failed to supervise who they authorized to utilize the platform and is in apparent defiance of Meta’s own terms of service. According to Attorney Olofsson, facebook’s inactions are gravely negligent. Infractions of the Swedish penal code for fraud, aggravated fraud, aiding and abetting fraud and aggravated fraud are among the accusations brought against Meta.

The prosecution’s request to continue the case against Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta Platforms Inc. META, was granted by a Swedish court in Lule. Olofsson said he filed a case in the Swedish city of Lule because it houses the Meta network’s central data center. Olofsson asserts that the court’s prompt ruling, which came about just 36 hours after the case was filed, is already a “major win” that will “send a warning to the others we have in the legal route that we are continuing forward, full throttle, with further lawsuits in the meanwhile.” Olofsson told the Green Market Report that he would also be taking legal action against Google, CNN, and Youtube for the roles they played or failed to play while the scam was active.

The Beginning: The JuicyFields Ponzi Scam

JuicyFields was founded in 2020 and provided a service where investors, or as the business referred to them, “e-growers,” could take part in the cultivating, harvesting, and selling of cannabis plants with monthly returns ranging from 6% to 14%. According to JuicyFields, 500,000 people utilize the site, primarily in Europe and Latin America. With a minimum investment of €50 (about $51), users may invest up to €180,000 ($183,000).

Cash could be added and taken out via a bank transfer or digital currency. Users could maintain the plants in virtual greenhouses, purchase and sell them, and get compensated for their transactions. Midway through July, JuicyFields abruptly ceased operations. Cash withdrawals were stopped, juicyfields profiles were deleted from social networking sites, and everything vanished without a trace. As a result, its users could not access their accounts and withdraw.

Investigators claim the business attracted investors by launching ad campaigns through social media influencers, referral schemes, and the publication of articles in a number of news outlets, thereby establishing a reputation that would draw more users to the platform. JuicyFields claimed to have agreements with leading members of the cannabis business, like Aurora Cannabis and Canopy Growth, among others, according to a journalistic investigation by the Spanish publication El Paso Financiero. However, major players in the cannabis sector denied having any connection to the cannabis investment website. The scope of the alleged deception by JuicyFields is unclear. Tens of millions to billions of dollars have been estimated.

Lawsuit Action Against Social and News Media Platforms

Olofsson became interested in the fraud since it affected thousands of people worldwide and made headlines.  The lawyer is already preparing to bring a class action lawsuit against a number of social and mainstream media outlets, which he claims assisted in the scheme’s advancement.

At the time, Olofsson said to Green Market Report, “I’m now pursuing legal action against Facebook, Google, CNN, and YouTube, to start with. All of them enabled JuicyFields to advertise on respective platforms or publications in addition to running regular accounts.

The governments of Germany, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and Cyprus will also be the targets of Olofsson’s criticism for “a terrible absence of their financial authorities who failed to detect what was going on.”

At the time of the platform’s collapse, which revealed the truth of fraud, there were around 125,000 investor accounts on it. Although Olofsson believes the $2 billion to $2.5 billion in those 125,000 accounts is likely already gone, he will still be representing about 800 litigants to ensure some sort of justice is delivered. Olofsson also revealed that he has a lot of information on several companies, people, government authorities, and banks who neglected their duties or allowed JuicyFields to engage in sales and marketing for the two years that the scam was active.

The Facebook Lawsuit

In 2011, Meta opened its first data center outside of the United States in Lule, just north of the Arctic Circle. This facility serves “nearly a billion Facebook and Instagram users, which includes most of my clients,” according to Olofsson. “This is where the crime occurred according to the premise. My clients came into contact with JuicyFields’ scam through these servers.

The complaint states that “the major marketing was done through social media where they engaged with new investors and developed groups where they could interact and foster a feeling of community and also encouraged others to come along and invest in the company.

Olofsson claims that Zuckerberg acted carelessly as CEO of Meta by neglecting to monitor who was utilizing the company’s services. Additionally, it asserts that his careless actions were a breach of the business’s own terms of service, which is illegal under Sweden’s anti-fraud laws. Such laws require criminal penalties of two to six years for violations.

He further mentioned that additional legal actions would be taken both domestically and abroad. The attorney previously stated that although the inquiry is difficult, to put it mildly, 70 people, 60 banks, and 40 firms connected to JuicyFields’ business and advertising have already been effectively identified.

Bottom Line

By taking on internet powerhouses for lack of due diligence on illegal operations carried out by their clients, marketers, and affiliates, Olofsson appears to be creating a precedent. He is pursuing corporate giants in the banking and media industries, which helped JucyField’s unlawful activities by indirectly profiting from them as well as some well-known cannabis legalization activists and supporters who were on Juicyfield’s payroll.

Source: https://cannabis.net/blog/news/can-you-sue-facebook-if-you-get-scammed-online-zuckerberg-sued-for-aiding-and-abetting-fraud-in

Business

New Mexico cannabis operator fined, loses license for alleged BioTrack fraud

Published

on

New Mexico regulators fined a cannabis operator nearly $300,000 and revoked its license after the company allegedly created fake reports in the state’s traceability software.

The New Mexico Cannabis Control Division (CCD) accused marijuana manufacturer and retailer Golden Roots of 11 violations, according to Albuquerque Business First.

Golden Roots operates the The Cannabis Revolution Dispensary.

The majority of the violations are related to the Albuquerque company’s improper use of BioTrack, which has been New Mexico’s track-and-trace vendor since 2015.

The CCD alleges Golden Roots reported marijuana production only two months after it had received its vertically integrated license, according to Albuquerque Business First.

Because cannabis takes longer than two months to be cultivated, the CCD was suspicious of the report.

After inspecting the company’s premises, the CCD alleged Golden Roots reported cultivation, transportation and sales in BioTrack but wasn’t able to provide officers who inspected the site evidence that the operator was cultivating cannabis.

In April, the CCD revoked Golden Roots’ license and issued a $10,000 fine, according to the news outlet.

The company requested a hearing, which the regulator scheduled for Sept. 1.

At the hearing, the CCD testified that the company’s dried-cannabis weights in BioTrack were suspicious because they didn’t seem to accurately reflect how much weight marijuana loses as it dries.

Company employees also poorly accounted for why they were making adjustments in the system of up to 24 pounds of cannabis, making comments such as “bad” or “mistake” in the software, Albuquerque Business First reported.

Golden Roots was fined $298,972.05 – the amount regulators allege the company made selling products that weren’t properly accounted for in BioTrack.

The CCD has been cracking down on cannabis operators accused of selling products procured from out-of-state or not grown legally:

Golden Roots was the first alleged rulebreaker in New Mexico to be asked to pay a large fine.

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/new-mexico-cannabis-operator-fined-loses-license-for-alleged-biotrack-fraud/

Continue Reading

Business

Marijuana companies suing US attorney general in federal prohibition challenge

Published

on

Four marijuana companies, including a multistate operator, have filed a lawsuit against U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland in which they allege the federal MJ prohibition under the Controlled Substances Act is no longer constitutional.

According to the complaint, filed Thursday in U.S. District Court in Massachusetts, retailer Canna Provisions, Treevit delivery service CEO Gyasi Sellers, cultivator Wiseacre Farm and MSO Verano Holdings Corp. are all harmed by “the federal government’s unconstitutional ban on cultivating, manufacturing, distributing, or possessing intrastate marijuana.”

Verano is headquartered in Chicago but has operations in Massachusetts; the other three operators are based in Massachusetts.

The lawsuit seeks a ruling that the “Controlled Substances Act is unconstitutional as applied to the intrastate cultivation, manufacture, possession, and distribution of marijuana pursuant to state law.”

The companies want the case to go before the U.S. Supreme Court.

They hired prominent law firm Boies Schiller Flexner to represent them.

The New York-based firm’s principal is David Boies, whose former clients include Microsoft, former presidential candidate Al Gore and Elizabeth Holmes’ disgraced startup Theranos.

Similar challenges to the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA) have failed.

One such challenge led to a landmark Supreme Court decision in 2005.

In Gonzalez vs. Raich, the highest court in the United States ruled in a 6-3 decision that the commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution gave Congress the power to outlaw marijuana federally, even though state laws allow the cultivation and sale of cannabis.

In the 18 years since that ruling, 23 states and the District of Columbia have legalized adult-use marijuana and the federal government has allowed a multibillion-dollar cannabis industry to thrive.

Since both Congress and the U.S. Department of Justice, currently headed by Garland, have declined to intervene in state-licensed marijuana markets, the key facts that led to the Supreme Court’s 2005 ruling “no longer apply,” Boies said in a statement Thursday.

“The Supreme Court has since made clear that the federal government lacks the authority to regulate purely intrastate commerce,” Boies said.

“Moreover, the facts on which those precedents are based are no longer true.”

Verano President Darren Weiss said in a statement the company is “prepared to bring this case all the way to the Supreme Court in order to align federal law with how Congress has acted for years.”

While the Biden administration’s push to reschedule marijuana would help solve marijuana operators’ federal tax woes, neither rescheduling nor modest Congressional reforms such as the SAFER Banking Act “solve the fundamental issue,” Weiss added.

“The application of the CSA to lawful state-run cannabis business is an unconstitutional overreach on state sovereignty that has led to decades of harm, failed businesses, lost jobs, and unsafe working conditions.”

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/marijuana-companies-suing-us-attorney-general-to-overturn-federal-prohibition/

Continue Reading

Business

Alabama to make another attempt Dec. 1 to award medical cannabis licenses

Published

on

Alabama regulators are targeting Dec. 1 to award the first batch of medical cannabis business licenses after the agency’s first two attempts were scrapped because of scoring errors and litigation.

The first licenses will be awarded to individual cultivators, delivery providers, processors, dispensaries and state testing labs, according to the Alabama Medical Cannabis Commission (AMCC).

Then, on Dec. 12, the AMCC will award licenses for vertically integrated operations, a designation set primarily for multistate operators.

Licenses are expected to be handed out 28 days after they have been awarded, so MMJ production could begin in early January, according to the Alabama Daily News.

That means MMJ products could be available for patients around early March, an AMCC spokesperson told the media outlet.

Regulators initially awarded 21 business licenses in June, only to void them after applicants alleged inconsistencies with how the applications were scored.

Then, in August, the state awarded 24 different licenses – 19 went to June recipients – only to reverse themselves again and scratch those licenses after spurned applicants filed lawsuits.

A state judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by Chicago-based MSO Verano Holdings Corp., but another lawsuit is pending.

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/alabama-plans-to-award-medical-cannabis-licenses-dec-1/

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 420 Reports Marijuana News & Information Website | Reefer News | Cannabis News