Connect with us

Business

A conversation on what it means to be LGBTQ+ in the cannabis industry

Published

on

The LGBTQ+ and cannabis communities are inextricably linked thanks to the HIV/Aids activists who worked to pass Proposition 215, the 1996 law that legalized medical cannabis in California. As we enter Pride season, you’ll probably see some brands “rainbow-washing,” or putting on a colorful but performative show of solidarity that oftentimes does not directly benefit the LGBTQ+ community at all.

Once considered an exclusive boys’ club, the cannabis industry continues to evolve into a more diverse and inclusive space, but there is still work to be done. In celebration of Pride, Weedmaps sat down with LGBTQ+ cannabis professionals to have the difficult yet necessary conversations about their experiences working in the industry.

This discussion on cannabis, equality, and how we can all contribute to a more inclusive industry, features three professionals who identify as members of the LGBTQ+ community:

WM: Do you feel that your identity as an LGBTQ+ person and as a cannabis professional are intertwined?

Eizen: Absolutely. I think it’s so important to be outspokenly queer in all of my art and work. By doing this, it honors the history the LGBTQIA+ community has had on cannabis. It’s the lens through which I experience my life and plays a role in the art and message I am bringing to this space.

Thomas: Absolutely. Being that we are living in a pandemic, it’s hard not to think of the AIDS pandemic. During the 1980s crisis, cannabis was, although still heavily criminalized, one of the only reliefs for HIV patients as palliative care.

Being a gay Black male, and knowing how my community is affected by HIV and has been by COVID, I know that this plant is truly a healing plant. It helps people with their mental health, as well as their internal health through our endocannabinoid system. So being a member of the LGBT community and being classified as Black and African-American, I feel as if I’ve been connected to the plant for centuries.

Vitale: I’ve been a longtime consumer and cannabis patient — and I’m also queer. These attributes lend me a deeper perspective of the potential for cannabis legalization and pleasure positivity that helps me better educate these subjects to the media and their readers. There are practical, real, and personal reasons for taking these concepts outside of fringe culture and into the mainstream.

What challenges have you faced as a member of the LGBTQ+ community in your professional life?

Thomas: I remember when I first started DJing and I was really making my rounds in the club circuit and starting to make a name for myself in New York. My manager at the time told me to tone down the “gay stuff.” It was at that moment that I knew I wasn’t truly accepted or welcome.

Now, I had my identity to worry about in certain spaces that were not as inclusive as they are today. Progress has definitely been made in that sense. But growing up in the nightlife scene and in entertainment has been an internal and external journey, and cannabis has been a big healing thing for me.

Vitale: My position in leading public relations campaigns puts me in a proud position to advocate on behalf of the LGBTQ+ community with CEOs and industry leaders, but it can be exhausting being the lone queer in the room.

How do you feel the cannabis industry has changed over the years?

Eizen: I’ve been working in cannabis in California since the medical days, starting as a budtender and quickly finding any excuse to take pictures in the grow room. When cannabis became adult-use, I noticed how the bigger brands’ marketing was not speaking to the incredibly diverse collective culture of cannabis consumers. I was tired of seeing images that were only catered to the straight, male consumer, so I decided to create the content I wanted to see.

I want to bring the arts back into cannabis, as so many greats have done in the past. By doing this, I am fighting for the creative soul of this industry. And I will use any platform I have to lift up others and make this space more inclusive and accessible to all.

Vitale: While we still have a ways to go, I’m seeing marginalized folks taken more seriously now. I would often feel uncomfortable as a queer woman at industry conferences; but now, I’ve found my community of LGBTQIA+ and boss babe thought leaders. I don’t feel there’s a boys’ club vibe at these events anymore. Instead, I can always find a [smoke] circle of empowered and empowering powerhouses.

What are the most effective ways for cannabis consumers to support the LGBTQ+ community?

Eizen: Obviously buying from queer-owned brands is important. Also, supporting important social causes such as criminal justice and drug policy reform is too, but I think the only way we’ll see tangible support is from the top down — way before it even reaches the consumer. The real work is through brands putting their money where their rainbow flag is and supporting queer, trans, BIPOC folks monetarily all year round.

Thomas: I think, honestly, the best way to support the LGBT community is to seek out queer and Black-owned cannabis brands. We’re all in this together, so to speak, so we have to support each other in the diaspora. There’s a generational income gap for trans people, especially, that we can truly change as we’re seeing with the billions of dollars being made off this industry. Being conscious about the products that you buy is big. I encourage more of the cannabis culture to invade the LGBT culture that has been demonized.

Vitale: If you’re in a state where trans or reproductive rights are currently on the chopping block, write to your legislators and elect leaders who believe access to abortion and gender-affirming care is a human right.

How can we collectively work toward a more inclusive space for all in the industry?

Thomas: I think the best way to work towards a more inclusive space is to give voice to the people in those spaces. If you want to know information about the trans community, seek out a trans person, and don’t be upset about reactions to questions you may have. But also, know that those people should be compensated. I am definitely ringing the bell that compensation is the best way to support.

Vitale: We need to continue listening when someone who doesn’t look like us — or comes from a different background or lives a different lifestyle — speaks up to share their perspective. Instead of putting our hands up defensively, recognize the emotional labor it took for them to voice their perspective, thank them for their insight and take a serious, private reflection on what they say.

Source: https://weedmaps.com/news/2022/06/being-lgbtq-in-the-cannabis-industry/

Business

New Mexico cannabis operator fined, loses license for alleged BioTrack fraud

Published

on

New Mexico regulators fined a cannabis operator nearly $300,000 and revoked its license after the company allegedly created fake reports in the state’s traceability software.

The New Mexico Cannabis Control Division (CCD) accused marijuana manufacturer and retailer Golden Roots of 11 violations, according to Albuquerque Business First.

Golden Roots operates the The Cannabis Revolution Dispensary.

The majority of the violations are related to the Albuquerque company’s improper use of BioTrack, which has been New Mexico’s track-and-trace vendor since 2015.

The CCD alleges Golden Roots reported marijuana production only two months after it had received its vertically integrated license, according to Albuquerque Business First.

Because cannabis takes longer than two months to be cultivated, the CCD was suspicious of the report.

After inspecting the company’s premises, the CCD alleged Golden Roots reported cultivation, transportation and sales in BioTrack but wasn’t able to provide officers who inspected the site evidence that the operator was cultivating cannabis.

In April, the CCD revoked Golden Roots’ license and issued a $10,000 fine, according to the news outlet.

The company requested a hearing, which the regulator scheduled for Sept. 1.

At the hearing, the CCD testified that the company’s dried-cannabis weights in BioTrack were suspicious because they didn’t seem to accurately reflect how much weight marijuana loses as it dries.

Company employees also poorly accounted for why they were making adjustments in the system of up to 24 pounds of cannabis, making comments such as “bad” or “mistake” in the software, Albuquerque Business First reported.

Golden Roots was fined $298,972.05 – the amount regulators allege the company made selling products that weren’t properly accounted for in BioTrack.

The CCD has been cracking down on cannabis operators accused of selling products procured from out-of-state or not grown legally:

Golden Roots was the first alleged rulebreaker in New Mexico to be asked to pay a large fine.

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/new-mexico-cannabis-operator-fined-loses-license-for-alleged-biotrack-fraud/

Continue Reading

Business

Marijuana companies suing US attorney general in federal prohibition challenge

Published

on

Four marijuana companies, including a multistate operator, have filed a lawsuit against U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland in which they allege the federal MJ prohibition under the Controlled Substances Act is no longer constitutional.

According to the complaint, filed Thursday in U.S. District Court in Massachusetts, retailer Canna Provisions, Treevit delivery service CEO Gyasi Sellers, cultivator Wiseacre Farm and MSO Verano Holdings Corp. are all harmed by “the federal government’s unconstitutional ban on cultivating, manufacturing, distributing, or possessing intrastate marijuana.”

Verano is headquartered in Chicago but has operations in Massachusetts; the other three operators are based in Massachusetts.

The lawsuit seeks a ruling that the “Controlled Substances Act is unconstitutional as applied to the intrastate cultivation, manufacture, possession, and distribution of marijuana pursuant to state law.”

The companies want the case to go before the U.S. Supreme Court.

They hired prominent law firm Boies Schiller Flexner to represent them.

The New York-based firm’s principal is David Boies, whose former clients include Microsoft, former presidential candidate Al Gore and Elizabeth Holmes’ disgraced startup Theranos.

Similar challenges to the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA) have failed.

One such challenge led to a landmark Supreme Court decision in 2005.

In Gonzalez vs. Raich, the highest court in the United States ruled in a 6-3 decision that the commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution gave Congress the power to outlaw marijuana federally, even though state laws allow the cultivation and sale of cannabis.

In the 18 years since that ruling, 23 states and the District of Columbia have legalized adult-use marijuana and the federal government has allowed a multibillion-dollar cannabis industry to thrive.

Since both Congress and the U.S. Department of Justice, currently headed by Garland, have declined to intervene in state-licensed marijuana markets, the key facts that led to the Supreme Court’s 2005 ruling “no longer apply,” Boies said in a statement Thursday.

“The Supreme Court has since made clear that the federal government lacks the authority to regulate purely intrastate commerce,” Boies said.

“Moreover, the facts on which those precedents are based are no longer true.”

Verano President Darren Weiss said in a statement the company is “prepared to bring this case all the way to the Supreme Court in order to align federal law with how Congress has acted for years.”

While the Biden administration’s push to reschedule marijuana would help solve marijuana operators’ federal tax woes, neither rescheduling nor modest Congressional reforms such as the SAFER Banking Act “solve the fundamental issue,” Weiss added.

“The application of the CSA to lawful state-run cannabis business is an unconstitutional overreach on state sovereignty that has led to decades of harm, failed businesses, lost jobs, and unsafe working conditions.”

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/marijuana-companies-suing-us-attorney-general-to-overturn-federal-prohibition/

Continue Reading

Business

Alabama to make another attempt Dec. 1 to award medical cannabis licenses

Published

on

Alabama regulators are targeting Dec. 1 to award the first batch of medical cannabis business licenses after the agency’s first two attempts were scrapped because of scoring errors and litigation.

The first licenses will be awarded to individual cultivators, delivery providers, processors, dispensaries and state testing labs, according to the Alabama Medical Cannabis Commission (AMCC).

Then, on Dec. 12, the AMCC will award licenses for vertically integrated operations, a designation set primarily for multistate operators.

Licenses are expected to be handed out 28 days after they have been awarded, so MMJ production could begin in early January, according to the Alabama Daily News.

That means MMJ products could be available for patients around early March, an AMCC spokesperson told the media outlet.

Regulators initially awarded 21 business licenses in June, only to void them after applicants alleged inconsistencies with how the applications were scored.

Then, in August, the state awarded 24 different licenses – 19 went to June recipients – only to reverse themselves again and scratch those licenses after spurned applicants filed lawsuits.

A state judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by Chicago-based MSO Verano Holdings Corp., but another lawsuit is pending.

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/alabama-plans-to-award-medical-cannabis-licenses-dec-1/

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 420 Reports Marijuana News & Information Website | Reefer News | Cannabis News