Business
What is the Cannabis Gray Market? – NY Passes Bill to Regulate the Marijuana Gray Market
Not white, not black, but NY passes a bill to regulate the gray market!
The gray market is one that has severely affected the growth of the cannabis industry in many states. New York is not left behind in this reality as the unregulated cannabis market has severely halted the growth of legal businesses. Taxing has also been a nightmare due to the numerous unregulated activities in the industry. However, new dawn might be on the horizon as the New York Senate has just passed legislation to allow officials to curb the activities of gray markets. Read on as we explore what this bill entails and how it will influence the cannabis industry in New York.
The activities of illicit cannabis sellers in New York have been a recurring menace over the years and officials have labored to curb these acts. The lack of proper laws has kept officials shorthanded in this fight for a long but all of that is about to change. The New York Senate just approved a bill to allow regulators to seize illicit cannabis and increase fines levied on unlicensed operators. The bill was introduced to the House on Sunday by Senator Liz Kreuger before it received approval on Wednesday. The timing of this approval shows the seriousness of lawmakers in reducing the activities of gray markets before the start of legal sales of recreational cannabis in the state. Legal recreational cannabis sales are scheduled to commence in the state later this year.
Gray market cannabis bill
A spokesperson of Senator Kreuger, Justin Flagg has stated that the bill is set to empower the two agencies that are concerned with stopping illicit cannabis retailers in the state. The two agencies are the New York Office of Cannabis Management (OCM) and the Department of Taxation and Finance. He states that the activities of unregulated cannabis retailers have grown ubiquitous over the years in Manhattan. He further included that the activities skyrocketed when lawmakers made the move to legalize adult use of cannabis. The bill therefore will address retail cannabis operators that sprung up between the period of legislation and the issuance of licenses.
The situation of the legal recreational cannabis market in New York is that the OCM is still working on rules for the regulated market. This has stopped it from being able to issue licenses and open the market fully for the state. Some overzealous cannabis retailers have however gone ahead to start retail sales without licenses further increasing the circulation of illicit weed in the state.
Flagg explained that Senator Kreuger initiated this bill with the support of the Department of Taxation and Finance and the OCM. Both agencies have complained about their lack of legal backing to close unregulated cannabis businesses under the existing statute in the state. This bill, therefore, comes as a breath of fresh air as it empowers them to do what needs to be done within the confines of the law. Now both agencies can easily find unlicensed cannabis operators and seize weed and properties to cater for tax evasions and licenses that such businesses do not have.
Fines and punishments under this new bill
Illicit pot in New York is defined as any taxable cannabis product for which no tax was paid. There is an increase in the civil penalty for persons who knowingly possess such a type of cannabis product. The legislation also covers cannabis products that aren’t grown by or purchased from a licensed cannabis business of the state. The fine for possession of illicit weed was formerly at $200 per ounce or flower but it has now been increased to $400 per ounce. Consequently, there was also an increase in fines for possession of different forms of cannabis products. Edibles are fined $10 per milligram of THC, concentrates at $100 per gram, and illicit cannabis plants at $1,000.
Along with their fines, the Department of Taxation and Finance is also empowered by this new bill to address licensed businesses that sell illicit cannabis. Such businesses will have their certificate of registration revoked once it can be shown that they sell or purchase illicit weed. Premises where such activities are being carried out can also be closed down and have their properties seized in line with the bill. This improves the effectiveness of the department and also reduces the proliferation of such gray markets.
Menace of proliferating gray markets
Cannabis gray markets pose a major safety issue which Justin Flagg also pointed out while speaking about the recent bill. Unregulated cannabis retailers do not follow necessary safety precautions and packaging rules as stipulated by regulators. They also do not put in measures to keep such products from getting to the hands of children. This means the actions of gray markets further increase the risk of cannabis use by children. This means that for proper use of cannabis to be assured in a state with legal medical and recreational cannabis use, it must be through regulated operators.
Possible oversight in stamping the bill this early?
Not everyone however is in support of this present legislation put forward by Senator Kreuger. Joshua Waterman, co-founder of Legacy Growers Association who is also a grower himself has stated his faults with the legislation. He spoke to local media recently where he stated that officials might use the bill to do more than what it stipulates. Waterman believes the officials of the state are likely to use the bill to penalize and fine minorities and lower-class individuals.
Waterman believes that this move by the state to release and stamp such a bill is more likely to build mistrust between them and legacy growers. The state has repeatedly claimed that it wants legacy people to be included in the legal market. Yet Waterman believes that it is counterproductive for the state to put out such a bill before it releases applications for licensing.
Bottom line
The emergence of this bill is certainly a breath of fresh air for those in enforcement agencies. All that is left is for full implementation to commence and proper structuring to ensure efficiency.
Business
New Mexico cannabis operator fined, loses license for alleged BioTrack fraud
New Mexico regulators fined a cannabis operator nearly $300,000 and revoked its license after the company allegedly created fake reports in the state’s traceability software.
The New Mexico Cannabis Control Division (CCD) accused marijuana manufacturer and retailer Golden Roots of 11 violations, according to Albuquerque Business First.
Golden Roots operates the The Cannabis Revolution Dispensary.
The majority of the violations are related to the Albuquerque company’s improper use of BioTrack, which has been New Mexico’s track-and-trace vendor since 2015.
The CCD alleges Golden Roots reported marijuana production only two months after it had received its vertically integrated license, according to Albuquerque Business First.
Because cannabis takes longer than two months to be cultivated, the CCD was suspicious of the report.
After inspecting the company’s premises, the CCD alleged Golden Roots reported cultivation, transportation and sales in BioTrack but wasn’t able to provide officers who inspected the site evidence that the operator was cultivating cannabis.
In April, the CCD revoked Golden Roots’ license and issued a $10,000 fine, according to the news outlet.
The company requested a hearing, which the regulator scheduled for Sept. 1.
At the hearing, the CCD testified that the company’s dried-cannabis weights in BioTrack were suspicious because they didn’t seem to accurately reflect how much weight marijuana loses as it dries.
Company employees also poorly accounted for why they were making adjustments in the system of up to 24 pounds of cannabis, making comments such as “bad” or “mistake” in the software, Albuquerque Business First reported.
Golden Roots was fined $298,972.05 – the amount regulators allege the company made selling products that weren’t properly accounted for in BioTrack.
The CCD has been cracking down on cannabis operators accused of selling products procured from out-of-state or not grown legally:
- Regulators alleged in August that Albuquerque dispensary Sawmill Sweet Leaf sold out-of-state products and didn’t have a license for extraction.
- Paradise Exotics Distro lost its license in July after regulators alleged the company sold products made in California.
Golden Roots was the first alleged rulebreaker in New Mexico to be asked to pay a large fine.
Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/new-mexico-cannabis-operator-fined-loses-license-for-alleged-biotrack-fraud/
Business
Marijuana companies suing US attorney general in federal prohibition challenge
Four marijuana companies, including a multistate operator, have filed a lawsuit against U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland in which they allege the federal MJ prohibition under the Controlled Substances Act is no longer constitutional.
According to the complaint, filed Thursday in U.S. District Court in Massachusetts, retailer Canna Provisions, Treevit delivery service CEO Gyasi Sellers, cultivator Wiseacre Farm and MSO Verano Holdings Corp. are all harmed by “the federal government’s unconstitutional ban on cultivating, manufacturing, distributing, or possessing intrastate marijuana.”
Verano is headquartered in Chicago but has operations in Massachusetts; the other three operators are based in Massachusetts.
The lawsuit seeks a ruling that the “Controlled Substances Act is unconstitutional as applied to the intrastate cultivation, manufacture, possession, and distribution of marijuana pursuant to state law.”
The companies want the case to go before the U.S. Supreme Court.
They hired prominent law firm Boies Schiller Flexner to represent them.
The New York-based firm’s principal is David Boies, whose former clients include Microsoft, former presidential candidate Al Gore and Elizabeth Holmes’ disgraced startup Theranos.
Similar challenges to the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA) have failed.
One such challenge led to a landmark Supreme Court decision in 2005.
In Gonzalez vs. Raich, the highest court in the United States ruled in a 6-3 decision that the commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution gave Congress the power to outlaw marijuana federally, even though state laws allow the cultivation and sale of cannabis.
In the 18 years since that ruling, 23 states and the District of Columbia have legalized adult-use marijuana and the federal government has allowed a multibillion-dollar cannabis industry to thrive.
Since both Congress and the U.S. Department of Justice, currently headed by Garland, have declined to intervene in state-licensed marijuana markets, the key facts that led to the Supreme Court’s 2005 ruling “no longer apply,” Boies said in a statement Thursday.
“The Supreme Court has since made clear that the federal government lacks the authority to regulate purely intrastate commerce,” Boies said.
“Moreover, the facts on which those precedents are based are no longer true.”
Verano President Darren Weiss said in a statement the company is “prepared to bring this case all the way to the Supreme Court in order to align federal law with how Congress has acted for years.”
While the Biden administration’s push to reschedule marijuana would help solve marijuana operators’ federal tax woes, neither rescheduling nor modest Congressional reforms such as the SAFER Banking Act “solve the fundamental issue,” Weiss added.
“The application of the CSA to lawful state-run cannabis business is an unconstitutional overreach on state sovereignty that has led to decades of harm, failed businesses, lost jobs, and unsafe working conditions.”
Business
Alabama to make another attempt Dec. 1 to award medical cannabis licenses
Alabama regulators are targeting Dec. 1 to award the first batch of medical cannabis business licenses after the agency’s first two attempts were scrapped because of scoring errors and litigation.
The first licenses will be awarded to individual cultivators, delivery providers, processors, dispensaries and state testing labs, according to the Alabama Medical Cannabis Commission (AMCC).
Then, on Dec. 12, the AMCC will award licenses for vertically integrated operations, a designation set primarily for multistate operators.
Licenses are expected to be handed out 28 days after they have been awarded, so MMJ production could begin in early January, according to the Alabama Daily News.
That means MMJ products could be available for patients around early March, an AMCC spokesperson told the media outlet.
Regulators initially awarded 21 business licenses in June, only to void them after applicants alleged inconsistencies with how the applications were scored.
Then, in August, the state awarded 24 different licenses – 19 went to June recipients – only to reverse themselves again and scratch those licenses after spurned applicants filed lawsuits.
A state judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by Chicago-based MSO Verano Holdings Corp., but another lawsuit is pending.
Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/alabama-plans-to-award-medical-cannabis-licenses-dec-1/
-
Business1 year ago
Pot Odor Does Not Justify Probable Cause for Vehicle Searches, Minnesota Court Affirms
-
Business1 year ago
New Mexico cannabis operator fined, loses license for alleged BioTrack fraud
-
Business1 year ago
Alabama to make another attempt Dec. 1 to award medical cannabis licenses
-
Business1 year ago
Washington State Pays Out $9.4 Million in Refunds Relating to Drug Convictions
-
Business1 year ago
Marijuana companies suing US attorney general in federal prohibition challenge
-
Business1 year ago
Legal Marijuana Handed A Nothing Burger From NY State
-
Business1 year ago
Can Cannabis Help Seasonal Depression
-
Blogs1 year ago
Cannabis Art Is Flourishing On Etsy