Business
Principals of cannabis brand Cookies sued by another former partner
A third party – and second partner – with ties to Cookies has filed a lawsuit against the co-founders and executives behind the popular cannabis brand alleging that a business deal went very sour.
The latest allegations are laid out in a lawsuit filed July 3 in Los Angeles Superior Court by attorneys representing H n V Holdings, the parent company of Seed Junky, a California genetics company.
In 2019, Cookies and Seed Junky partnered on a separate genetics brand called Minntz, the lawsuit claims, 51% of which was owned by Cookies and 49% by Seed Junky.
But Cookies executives “abused their power … to cook Minntz’s books to Seed Junky’s detriment” and “line their pockets at Minntz’s and Seed Junky’s expense,” the lawsuit alleges.
Cookies also “stole Minntz’s proprietary cannabis genetics, mislabeled them, and fraudulently sold them as Cookies’ own product and/or provided them to Cookies affiliated cultivators in exchange for lucrative kickbacks and priority treatment,” the lawsuit adds.
Among the parties named in the lawsuit, which claims breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud and violations of California business law, are:
- Cookies Creative Consulting.
- Cookies SF.
- Company co-founder and CEO Gilbert Milam Jr., better known as rapper Berner.
- Parker Berling, the company’s less-visible president, who also served as the sole member of the Minntz management board, according to the suit.
- Lesjai Peronnet Chang, a Cookies co-founder and prominent breeder better known as Jai.
- Ian Habernicht, Cookies’ chief financial officer.
Hearings in the case are scheduled for September and October, according to the public court docket.
The two parties traded barbs on social media after the lawsuit was filed.
In an Instagram post Wednesday, Seed Junky founder Anthony Hart, also known as JBeezy, said he and a partner were “sold a dream which never materialized.”
“We tried our best to be patient and humble despite the obvious issues we were dealing with … but now accountability must happen,” Hart wrote.
“Not only for us but also to let everyone know in this industry you must be willing to be ethical partners and break bread.”
In a rebuttal, Berner called the lawsuit “completely false” and also took a few jabs.
He referenced Seed Junky’s partnership with Glass House Group, co-founded by a former police officer; accused Seed Junky of selling clones infected with hop latent viroid; and said Hart’s brand “failed.”
“Dude’s been crying like a little b**** on Instagram for a long time, throwing subliminals,” Berner said in a video.
“When we met, we brought a lot of value together. We killed it together. We were aligned. You chose to go do your own thing.
“You went off to go do Seed Junky with somebody else, and you failed. You failed, bro, you failed. Seed Junky did not pop.”
Seed Junky’s suit is at least the third instance of a former brand partner suing Cookies this year.
The exact details vary from lawsuit to lawsuit, but the broad allegations against the company follow a similar pattern, with Cookies executives reneging on agreements to enrich themselves, the suits allege.
One suit, filed by a Florida-based company that partnered with Cookies to manufacture and distribute Cookies-branded delta-8 products, was settled out of court after it drew media attention.
Another, filed by Cookies investors, is still pending.
The suits amount to “a pattern and practice of illicit activity,” Seed Junky’s lawsuit claims.
Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/principals-of-cannabis-brand-cookies-sued-by-another-former-partner/
Business
New Mexico cannabis operator fined, loses license for alleged BioTrack fraud
New Mexico regulators fined a cannabis operator nearly $300,000 and revoked its license after the company allegedly created fake reports in the state’s traceability software.
The New Mexico Cannabis Control Division (CCD) accused marijuana manufacturer and retailer Golden Roots of 11 violations, according to Albuquerque Business First.
Golden Roots operates the The Cannabis Revolution Dispensary.
The majority of the violations are related to the Albuquerque company’s improper use of BioTrack, which has been New Mexico’s track-and-trace vendor since 2015.
The CCD alleges Golden Roots reported marijuana production only two months after it had received its vertically integrated license, according to Albuquerque Business First.
Because cannabis takes longer than two months to be cultivated, the CCD was suspicious of the report.
After inspecting the company’s premises, the CCD alleged Golden Roots reported cultivation, transportation and sales in BioTrack but wasn’t able to provide officers who inspected the site evidence that the operator was cultivating cannabis.
In April, the CCD revoked Golden Roots’ license and issued a $10,000 fine, according to the news outlet.
The company requested a hearing, which the regulator scheduled for Sept. 1.
At the hearing, the CCD testified that the company’s dried-cannabis weights in BioTrack were suspicious because they didn’t seem to accurately reflect how much weight marijuana loses as it dries.
Company employees also poorly accounted for why they were making adjustments in the system of up to 24 pounds of cannabis, making comments such as “bad” or “mistake” in the software, Albuquerque Business First reported.
Golden Roots was fined $298,972.05 – the amount regulators allege the company made selling products that weren’t properly accounted for in BioTrack.
The CCD has been cracking down on cannabis operators accused of selling products procured from out-of-state or not grown legally:
- Regulators alleged in August that Albuquerque dispensary Sawmill Sweet Leaf sold out-of-state products and didn’t have a license for extraction.
- Paradise Exotics Distro lost its license in July after regulators alleged the company sold products made in California.
Golden Roots was the first alleged rulebreaker in New Mexico to be asked to pay a large fine.
Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/new-mexico-cannabis-operator-fined-loses-license-for-alleged-biotrack-fraud/
Business
Marijuana companies suing US attorney general in federal prohibition challenge
Four marijuana companies, including a multistate operator, have filed a lawsuit against U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland in which they allege the federal MJ prohibition under the Controlled Substances Act is no longer constitutional.
According to the complaint, filed Thursday in U.S. District Court in Massachusetts, retailer Canna Provisions, Treevit delivery service CEO Gyasi Sellers, cultivator Wiseacre Farm and MSO Verano Holdings Corp. are all harmed by “the federal government’s unconstitutional ban on cultivating, manufacturing, distributing, or possessing intrastate marijuana.”
Verano is headquartered in Chicago but has operations in Massachusetts; the other three operators are based in Massachusetts.
The lawsuit seeks a ruling that the “Controlled Substances Act is unconstitutional as applied to the intrastate cultivation, manufacture, possession, and distribution of marijuana pursuant to state law.”
The companies want the case to go before the U.S. Supreme Court.
They hired prominent law firm Boies Schiller Flexner to represent them.
The New York-based firm’s principal is David Boies, whose former clients include Microsoft, former presidential candidate Al Gore and Elizabeth Holmes’ disgraced startup Theranos.
Similar challenges to the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA) have failed.
One such challenge led to a landmark Supreme Court decision in 2005.
In Gonzalez vs. Raich, the highest court in the United States ruled in a 6-3 decision that the commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution gave Congress the power to outlaw marijuana federally, even though state laws allow the cultivation and sale of cannabis.
In the 18 years since that ruling, 23 states and the District of Columbia have legalized adult-use marijuana and the federal government has allowed a multibillion-dollar cannabis industry to thrive.
Since both Congress and the U.S. Department of Justice, currently headed by Garland, have declined to intervene in state-licensed marijuana markets, the key facts that led to the Supreme Court’s 2005 ruling “no longer apply,” Boies said in a statement Thursday.
“The Supreme Court has since made clear that the federal government lacks the authority to regulate purely intrastate commerce,” Boies said.
“Moreover, the facts on which those precedents are based are no longer true.”
Verano President Darren Weiss said in a statement the company is “prepared to bring this case all the way to the Supreme Court in order to align federal law with how Congress has acted for years.”
While the Biden administration’s push to reschedule marijuana would help solve marijuana operators’ federal tax woes, neither rescheduling nor modest Congressional reforms such as the SAFER Banking Act “solve the fundamental issue,” Weiss added.
“The application of the CSA to lawful state-run cannabis business is an unconstitutional overreach on state sovereignty that has led to decades of harm, failed businesses, lost jobs, and unsafe working conditions.”
Business
Alabama to make another attempt Dec. 1 to award medical cannabis licenses
Alabama regulators are targeting Dec. 1 to award the first batch of medical cannabis business licenses after the agency’s first two attempts were scrapped because of scoring errors and litigation.
The first licenses will be awarded to individual cultivators, delivery providers, processors, dispensaries and state testing labs, according to the Alabama Medical Cannabis Commission (AMCC).
Then, on Dec. 12, the AMCC will award licenses for vertically integrated operations, a designation set primarily for multistate operators.
Licenses are expected to be handed out 28 days after they have been awarded, so MMJ production could begin in early January, according to the Alabama Daily News.
That means MMJ products could be available for patients around early March, an AMCC spokesperson told the media outlet.
Regulators initially awarded 21 business licenses in June, only to void them after applicants alleged inconsistencies with how the applications were scored.
Then, in August, the state awarded 24 different licenses – 19 went to June recipients – only to reverse themselves again and scratch those licenses after spurned applicants filed lawsuits.
A state judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by Chicago-based MSO Verano Holdings Corp., but another lawsuit is pending.
Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/alabama-plans-to-award-medical-cannabis-licenses-dec-1/
-
Business1 year ago
Pot Odor Does Not Justify Probable Cause for Vehicle Searches, Minnesota Court Affirms
-
Business1 year ago
New Mexico cannabis operator fined, loses license for alleged BioTrack fraud
-
Business1 year ago
Alabama to make another attempt Dec. 1 to award medical cannabis licenses
-
Business1 year ago
Washington State Pays Out $9.4 Million in Refunds Relating to Drug Convictions
-
Business1 year ago
Marijuana companies suing US attorney general in federal prohibition challenge
-
Business1 year ago
Legal Marijuana Handed A Nothing Burger From NY State
-
Business1 year ago
Can Cannabis Help Seasonal Depression
-
Blogs1 year ago
Cannabis Art Is Flourishing On Etsy