Connect with us

Business

Opinion: Regulatory changes threaten California’s ailing cannabis industry

Published

on

When California voters approved Proposition 64 in 2016, they did so based on the idea that a legal cannabis market would be a thriving cannabis market.

Our goal was to create a California cannabis industry that was poised to be a national model.

And, if the right moves were made at the federal level and marijuana were to be legalized, California cannabis would be as sought after worldwide as California wine.

However, fast-forward to today, and California’s legal market is teetering on the brink of disaster, hindered by a thriving illicit market, high taxes and burdensome regulations.

Case in point: The state Department of Cannabis Control once again is tinkering with the regulations for every license type in the supply chain.

Another public comment period regarding proposed rule changes just concluded.

One of the most crippling of all the proposed changes would deal a major blow to cannabis businesses that manufacture tinctures – a key product utilized by patients who rely on medical marijuana products.

Section 17302.1 of the amended regulations would cap all cannabis tinctures at 2 fluid ounces.

The manufacturers of cannabis tinctures, since Day One of legal sales in California, have created a large customer base, one that has become accustomed to properly dosing these products in a safe manner.

Patients often favor a larger-format, 1,000-milligram tincture – mainly because it isn’t always easy to find legal retail in their area because far too many jurisdictions ban legal marijuana activity.

Customer confusion and consistency

The proposed change to limit nonalcohol-based glycerin tinctures to 2 ounces would not only create customer confusion, but it would also remove the consistency they have become used to.

It would ultimately lead to patients accidentally taking a higher dosage, which would have severe public safety impacts.

While the proposed change was likely made to bring consistency to regulations regarding cannabis tinctures – alcohol-based and nonalcohol-based – every change in regulation has real consequences for California’s fledgling industry.

In fact, the unintended consequences of this amendment would be drastic on many fronts.

If manufacturers are forced to halt production and retool packaging to attain compliance, their already-tight profit margins would evaporate, forcing them to lay off employees at a time when many Californians are already struggling with the high cost of goods, services and housing.

Additionally, since many tincture manufacturers have been in business for some time, they have likely purchased in bulk for future production and are housing hundreds of thousands of plastic bottles and custom boxes that would be rendered useless by this change.

They would need to throw entire warehouses worth of packaging into the trash, resulting in tens of thousands of dollars lost while also negatively impacting the environment.

On top of that, why kill the golden goose? For years, legal marijuana manufacturers have generated millions of dollars in tax revenue for the state and local jurisdictions.

Tax revenue would dry up

Cannabis taxes are the only guaranteed revenue stream in the state budget for child care for children from birth to 13 years old, enabling more than 21,000 children to be in subsidized child care.

If the proposed rule change in 17302.1 is adopted, that revenue would dry up quickly.

This regulation change would be too significant to overcome for many licensed operators – not just for manufacturers but for the entire cannabis supply chain in California.

It would affect:

  • Retailers with thousands of tinctures on their shelves.
  • Distributors with thousands of units sitting in their inventory.
  • Testing laboratories with fewer products to test.
  • Oil suppliers that will definitely feel a sharp decrease in business if this change is enacted.

It’s long past time to start thinking about the greater good for patients and the industry operators who have jumped through every hoop set in front of them.

Regulatory changes are fine, but let’s make changes that help good operators stay in business and protect patients, not changes that will force marijuana business licensees to hang up their closed sign for good.

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/regulatory-changes-threaten-californias-ailing-cannabis-industry/

Business

New Mexico cannabis operator fined, loses license for alleged BioTrack fraud

Published

on

New Mexico regulators fined a cannabis operator nearly $300,000 and revoked its license after the company allegedly created fake reports in the state’s traceability software.

The New Mexico Cannabis Control Division (CCD) accused marijuana manufacturer and retailer Golden Roots of 11 violations, according to Albuquerque Business First.

Golden Roots operates the The Cannabis Revolution Dispensary.

The majority of the violations are related to the Albuquerque company’s improper use of BioTrack, which has been New Mexico’s track-and-trace vendor since 2015.

The CCD alleges Golden Roots reported marijuana production only two months after it had received its vertically integrated license, according to Albuquerque Business First.

Because cannabis takes longer than two months to be cultivated, the CCD was suspicious of the report.

After inspecting the company’s premises, the CCD alleged Golden Roots reported cultivation, transportation and sales in BioTrack but wasn’t able to provide officers who inspected the site evidence that the operator was cultivating cannabis.

In April, the CCD revoked Golden Roots’ license and issued a $10,000 fine, according to the news outlet.

The company requested a hearing, which the regulator scheduled for Sept. 1.

At the hearing, the CCD testified that the company’s dried-cannabis weights in BioTrack were suspicious because they didn’t seem to accurately reflect how much weight marijuana loses as it dries.

Company employees also poorly accounted for why they were making adjustments in the system of up to 24 pounds of cannabis, making comments such as “bad” or “mistake” in the software, Albuquerque Business First reported.

Golden Roots was fined $298,972.05 – the amount regulators allege the company made selling products that weren’t properly accounted for in BioTrack.

The CCD has been cracking down on cannabis operators accused of selling products procured from out-of-state or not grown legally:

Golden Roots was the first alleged rulebreaker in New Mexico to be asked to pay a large fine.

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/new-mexico-cannabis-operator-fined-loses-license-for-alleged-biotrack-fraud/

Continue Reading

Business

Marijuana companies suing US attorney general in federal prohibition challenge

Published

on

Four marijuana companies, including a multistate operator, have filed a lawsuit against U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland in which they allege the federal MJ prohibition under the Controlled Substances Act is no longer constitutional.

According to the complaint, filed Thursday in U.S. District Court in Massachusetts, retailer Canna Provisions, Treevit delivery service CEO Gyasi Sellers, cultivator Wiseacre Farm and MSO Verano Holdings Corp. are all harmed by “the federal government’s unconstitutional ban on cultivating, manufacturing, distributing, or possessing intrastate marijuana.”

Verano is headquartered in Chicago but has operations in Massachusetts; the other three operators are based in Massachusetts.

The lawsuit seeks a ruling that the “Controlled Substances Act is unconstitutional as applied to the intrastate cultivation, manufacture, possession, and distribution of marijuana pursuant to state law.”

The companies want the case to go before the U.S. Supreme Court.

They hired prominent law firm Boies Schiller Flexner to represent them.

The New York-based firm’s principal is David Boies, whose former clients include Microsoft, former presidential candidate Al Gore and Elizabeth Holmes’ disgraced startup Theranos.

Similar challenges to the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA) have failed.

One such challenge led to a landmark Supreme Court decision in 2005.

In Gonzalez vs. Raich, the highest court in the United States ruled in a 6-3 decision that the commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution gave Congress the power to outlaw marijuana federally, even though state laws allow the cultivation and sale of cannabis.

In the 18 years since that ruling, 23 states and the District of Columbia have legalized adult-use marijuana and the federal government has allowed a multibillion-dollar cannabis industry to thrive.

Since both Congress and the U.S. Department of Justice, currently headed by Garland, have declined to intervene in state-licensed marijuana markets, the key facts that led to the Supreme Court’s 2005 ruling “no longer apply,” Boies said in a statement Thursday.

“The Supreme Court has since made clear that the federal government lacks the authority to regulate purely intrastate commerce,” Boies said.

“Moreover, the facts on which those precedents are based are no longer true.”

Verano President Darren Weiss said in a statement the company is “prepared to bring this case all the way to the Supreme Court in order to align federal law with how Congress has acted for years.”

While the Biden administration’s push to reschedule marijuana would help solve marijuana operators’ federal tax woes, neither rescheduling nor modest Congressional reforms such as the SAFER Banking Act “solve the fundamental issue,” Weiss added.

“The application of the CSA to lawful state-run cannabis business is an unconstitutional overreach on state sovereignty that has led to decades of harm, failed businesses, lost jobs, and unsafe working conditions.”

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/marijuana-companies-suing-us-attorney-general-to-overturn-federal-prohibition/

Continue Reading

Business

Alabama to make another attempt Dec. 1 to award medical cannabis licenses

Published

on

Alabama regulators are targeting Dec. 1 to award the first batch of medical cannabis business licenses after the agency’s first two attempts were scrapped because of scoring errors and litigation.

The first licenses will be awarded to individual cultivators, delivery providers, processors, dispensaries and state testing labs, according to the Alabama Medical Cannabis Commission (AMCC).

Then, on Dec. 12, the AMCC will award licenses for vertically integrated operations, a designation set primarily for multistate operators.

Licenses are expected to be handed out 28 days after they have been awarded, so MMJ production could begin in early January, according to the Alabama Daily News.

That means MMJ products could be available for patients around early March, an AMCC spokesperson told the media outlet.

Regulators initially awarded 21 business licenses in June, only to void them after applicants alleged inconsistencies with how the applications were scored.

Then, in August, the state awarded 24 different licenses – 19 went to June recipients – only to reverse themselves again and scratch those licenses after spurned applicants filed lawsuits.

A state judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by Chicago-based MSO Verano Holdings Corp., but another lawsuit is pending.

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/alabama-plans-to-award-medical-cannabis-licenses-dec-1/

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 420 Reports Marijuana News & Information Website | Reefer News | Cannabis News