Connect with us

Business

Nevada marijuana companies cite big wins from legislative session

Published

on

Nevada cannabis operators and other stakeholders lobbied for structural changes to the state’s adult-use and medical marijuana programs, and the legislature answered by approving several industry-friendly bills during its most recent session.

The industry-backed changes signed into law last month by Gov. Joe Lombardo included eliminating and capping various fees, reassessing penalties for operating violations and creating a dual license for retailers serving both medical patients and recreational consumers.

The policy overhauls, which garnered bipartisan support in Nevada’s Democrat-controlled Legislature, will save some operators tens of thousands of dollars per year in business expenses while significantly expanding retail access, industry insiders told MJBizDaily.

“As the legal cannabis industry continues to evolve and look for ways to better serve consumers with safe and affordable products, we are grateful that our state legislators and Gov. Lombardo responded with a slate of supportive legislation,” said Scot Rutledge, a partner at Argentum Partners, a government affairs and marketing firm based in Reno.

The developments come as Nevada posts cannabis sales well below the peaks seen in 2021, and industry executives prepare for the highly anticipated rollout of consumption lounges, primarily in Las Vegas.

Fines and fees

Through Senate Bill 195, the Nevada legislature granted cannabis operators reprieve from excessive fees, penalties and other compliance costs.

Key provisions of the bill include:

  • Eliminating the regulatory practice of “stacking” charges or violations. Under the new law, operators will be cited for a single violation rather than multiple citations for the same offense.
  • Eliminating the regulatory practice of “time-and-effort” billing, in which licensees were charged high hourly rates by the state’s Cannabis Compliance Board (CCB) for routine audits, inspections and investigations.
  • Lowering the maximum penalty for any single business violation from $90,000 to $20,000.

Under the prior system, stacking violations could lead to outrageous fines, according to Layke Martin, executive director of the Nevada Cannabis Association.

In one example she cited, the state fined a dispensary $40,000 following a complaint about lack of paper towels in a bathroom.

“If you look at some of the complaints in Nevada, you will see that they were most often in the six figures,” she said.

“Many of the times, they were for administrative violations.”

Under SB195, the CCB is also prohibited from invoicing cannabis businesses and applicants for so-called “time-and-effort” charges for normal business interactions with regulators, including document reviews and compliance inquiries. In Nevada, that rate was set at $111 per hour.

Last year, Nevada cannabis operators paid $1.7 million in time-and-effort charges, Martin said.

The new law mandates that regulators only bill operators for costs and charges authorized by state statute.

Opponents criticized the prior policy for essentially double-charging marijuana businesses since the CCB’s annual budget of about $10 million is entirely funded through cannabis excise taxes.

“We saw a 500% increase in time-and-effort billing to the industry over the past few years,” Martin said.

“I have one licensee in our in our membership who was billed $47,000 over the course of the year.”

The goal of these changes is to alleviate some of the economic burden on operators and incentivize compliance and cooperation, according to Melissa Waite, a Las Vegas attorney with the law firm Dickinson Wright.

“Cannabis operators hope SB195, coupled with other changes during the session, will provide more certainty and fairness in the disciplinary process,” she said.

Omnibus bill ushers in wholesale changes

Senate Bill 277 not only provides new benefits for consumers, retailers and the state’s supply chain, it reduces maximum fees for nearly every marijuana license, as outlined in legislation sent to the governor for his signature.

Last-minute amendments to increase some of those maximums were met with fierce industry resistance, insiders told MJBizDaily.

“The result was that the fees for initial licensing and renewal of an adult-use cannabis license were reduced, except for the initial issuance of an adult-use retail license, which remains unchanged at $20,000,” Waite said.

“The bill includes many other changes that undoubtedly benefit the industry.”

Other stipulations of the omnibus bill include:

  • The creation of a dual license for medical and recreational retailers, allowing them to serve any type of customer.
  • Increasing the purchasing limits of flower from 1 ounce to 2.5 ounces.
  • Increasing the purchasing limits of cannabis concentrates from an eighth of an ounce to a quarter of an ounce.

About one-third of Nevada’s 100 cannabis retailers will benefit from the dual-license designation, allowing them to serve both adult-use and medical consumers.

The state had roughly 12,500 medical marijuana cardholders at the end of May, according to the latest figures from the state’s Department of Health and Human Services.

More than 100 cultivators, processors and distributors also will benefit from the expanded market, according to the CCB.

Unique factors led to big changes

The bundle of approved cannabis-related legislation also included:

  • Establishing a working group to study psychedelics.
  • Creating an employment path in the industry for former convicts.
  • Revising the excise tax on wholesale cannabis to 15% of the actual sales price, rather than 15% of the “fair market value” set by the Nevada Department of Taxation. Fair market value often inflated the actual cost of goods sold, industry representatives said.

CCB Executive Director Tyler Klimas credited lawmakers for taking an aggressive approach to mitigate some of the industry’s biggest pain points and acknowledging what many states have yet to do.

“This is a recognition that the cannabis industry is a significant player in the state’s economy,” he told MJBizDaily. “And we’re evolving appropriately.”

The proliferation of bills also is partly a consequence of state lawmakers convening every other year to pass legislation, as well as the industry coalescing to address specific challenges.

“I think everyone has expectations and is comfortable with the idea that every two years, we’re going to come back and tweak things as the industry evolves,” Martin said.

“And then, we come back and try to fix what we can in a four-month time period.”

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/nevada-marijuana-companies-cite-big-wins-from-legislative-session/

Business

New Mexico cannabis operator fined, loses license for alleged BioTrack fraud

Published

on

New Mexico regulators fined a cannabis operator nearly $300,000 and revoked its license after the company allegedly created fake reports in the state’s traceability software.

The New Mexico Cannabis Control Division (CCD) accused marijuana manufacturer and retailer Golden Roots of 11 violations, according to Albuquerque Business First.

Golden Roots operates the The Cannabis Revolution Dispensary.

The majority of the violations are related to the Albuquerque company’s improper use of BioTrack, which has been New Mexico’s track-and-trace vendor since 2015.

The CCD alleges Golden Roots reported marijuana production only two months after it had received its vertically integrated license, according to Albuquerque Business First.

Because cannabis takes longer than two months to be cultivated, the CCD was suspicious of the report.

After inspecting the company’s premises, the CCD alleged Golden Roots reported cultivation, transportation and sales in BioTrack but wasn’t able to provide officers who inspected the site evidence that the operator was cultivating cannabis.

In April, the CCD revoked Golden Roots’ license and issued a $10,000 fine, according to the news outlet.

The company requested a hearing, which the regulator scheduled for Sept. 1.

At the hearing, the CCD testified that the company’s dried-cannabis weights in BioTrack were suspicious because they didn’t seem to accurately reflect how much weight marijuana loses as it dries.

Company employees also poorly accounted for why they were making adjustments in the system of up to 24 pounds of cannabis, making comments such as “bad” or “mistake” in the software, Albuquerque Business First reported.

Golden Roots was fined $298,972.05 – the amount regulators allege the company made selling products that weren’t properly accounted for in BioTrack.

The CCD has been cracking down on cannabis operators accused of selling products procured from out-of-state or not grown legally:

Golden Roots was the first alleged rulebreaker in New Mexico to be asked to pay a large fine.

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/new-mexico-cannabis-operator-fined-loses-license-for-alleged-biotrack-fraud/

Continue Reading

Business

Marijuana companies suing US attorney general in federal prohibition challenge

Published

on

Four marijuana companies, including a multistate operator, have filed a lawsuit against U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland in which they allege the federal MJ prohibition under the Controlled Substances Act is no longer constitutional.

According to the complaint, filed Thursday in U.S. District Court in Massachusetts, retailer Canna Provisions, Treevit delivery service CEO Gyasi Sellers, cultivator Wiseacre Farm and MSO Verano Holdings Corp. are all harmed by “the federal government’s unconstitutional ban on cultivating, manufacturing, distributing, or possessing intrastate marijuana.”

Verano is headquartered in Chicago but has operations in Massachusetts; the other three operators are based in Massachusetts.

The lawsuit seeks a ruling that the “Controlled Substances Act is unconstitutional as applied to the intrastate cultivation, manufacture, possession, and distribution of marijuana pursuant to state law.”

The companies want the case to go before the U.S. Supreme Court.

They hired prominent law firm Boies Schiller Flexner to represent them.

The New York-based firm’s principal is David Boies, whose former clients include Microsoft, former presidential candidate Al Gore and Elizabeth Holmes’ disgraced startup Theranos.

Similar challenges to the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA) have failed.

One such challenge led to a landmark Supreme Court decision in 2005.

In Gonzalez vs. Raich, the highest court in the United States ruled in a 6-3 decision that the commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution gave Congress the power to outlaw marijuana federally, even though state laws allow the cultivation and sale of cannabis.

In the 18 years since that ruling, 23 states and the District of Columbia have legalized adult-use marijuana and the federal government has allowed a multibillion-dollar cannabis industry to thrive.

Since both Congress and the U.S. Department of Justice, currently headed by Garland, have declined to intervene in state-licensed marijuana markets, the key facts that led to the Supreme Court’s 2005 ruling “no longer apply,” Boies said in a statement Thursday.

“The Supreme Court has since made clear that the federal government lacks the authority to regulate purely intrastate commerce,” Boies said.

“Moreover, the facts on which those precedents are based are no longer true.”

Verano President Darren Weiss said in a statement the company is “prepared to bring this case all the way to the Supreme Court in order to align federal law with how Congress has acted for years.”

While the Biden administration’s push to reschedule marijuana would help solve marijuana operators’ federal tax woes, neither rescheduling nor modest Congressional reforms such as the SAFER Banking Act “solve the fundamental issue,” Weiss added.

“The application of the CSA to lawful state-run cannabis business is an unconstitutional overreach on state sovereignty that has led to decades of harm, failed businesses, lost jobs, and unsafe working conditions.”

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/marijuana-companies-suing-us-attorney-general-to-overturn-federal-prohibition/

Continue Reading

Business

Alabama to make another attempt Dec. 1 to award medical cannabis licenses

Published

on

Alabama regulators are targeting Dec. 1 to award the first batch of medical cannabis business licenses after the agency’s first two attempts were scrapped because of scoring errors and litigation.

The first licenses will be awarded to individual cultivators, delivery providers, processors, dispensaries and state testing labs, according to the Alabama Medical Cannabis Commission (AMCC).

Then, on Dec. 12, the AMCC will award licenses for vertically integrated operations, a designation set primarily for multistate operators.

Licenses are expected to be handed out 28 days after they have been awarded, so MMJ production could begin in early January, according to the Alabama Daily News.

That means MMJ products could be available for patients around early March, an AMCC spokesperson told the media outlet.

Regulators initially awarded 21 business licenses in June, only to void them after applicants alleged inconsistencies with how the applications were scored.

Then, in August, the state awarded 24 different licenses – 19 went to June recipients – only to reverse themselves again and scratch those licenses after spurned applicants filed lawsuits.

A state judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by Chicago-based MSO Verano Holdings Corp., but another lawsuit is pending.

Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/alabama-plans-to-award-medical-cannabis-licenses-dec-1/

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 420 Reports Marijuana News & Information Website | Reefer News | Cannabis News