CBI Probe Deepens Into Possible Inside Network in NEET UG 2026 Leak

Investigation points to possible coordinated system breach involving exam officials, experts, and intermediaries

The investigation into the alleged NEET UG 2026 question paper leak has intensified, with the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) now examining the possibility of a wider internal network operating within the examination ecosystem. A Delhi court has granted 14 days of custody for a Pune-based biology lecturer as the agency deepens its inquiry into how confidential exam material may have been accessed and circulated.

According to officials, the case may extend beyond isolated misconduct, raising concerns about a coordinated conspiracy involving individuals linked to exam preparation and handling processes.

Court Flags Possibility of Larger Conspiracy

During proceedings at the Rouse Avenue Court in Delhi, the CBI argued that accused biology lecturer Manisha Gurunath Mandare allegedly collaborated with professor Prahlad Vitthal Rao Kulkarni and others to leak sensitive examination content.

The court, while approving custodial interrogation, observed that the allegations and surrounding circumstances indicate a potential larger conspiracy requiring detailed investigation.

Officials stated that multiple individuals suspected to be part of the network have not yet been identified, suggesting that the probe is still expanding.

Links to Exam Panel Under Investigation

Investigators told the court that Mandare was associated with the National Testing Agency expert panel and may have had access to confidential materials used in the NEET UG examination process.

Authorities allege that the group responsible for the leak provided question papers and answers to select candidates in exchange for significant financial payments.

The Central Bureau of Investigation is now examining how and at what stage the confidential information may have been compromised, and whether additional individuals within the system played a role.

Arrest and Digital Trail Examination

Sources indicate that Mandare was arrested from a hotel in Mathura after allegedly moving between locations and communication channels to avoid detection.

The agency is currently analyzing:

• Electronic devices
• Call detail records
• Email communications
• Financial transactions
• Digital messaging trails

Investigators are also probing whether encrypted or informal communication channels were used to distribute exam content to candidates.

Scrutiny of Security Systems and Exam Protocols

The CBI has expanded its investigation to include security arrangements at examination facilities, particularly focusing on how question papers were stored and handled.

Authorities have sought detailed records from the National Testing Agency regarding staff, expert panels, and personnel involved in the examination process.

Investigators are reviewing:

• CCTV footage from secure storage facilities
• Access logs for “strong room” areas
• Internal movement records
• Question paper handling procedures

The agency is also assessing whether any procedural lapses or unauthorized access points may have enabled the suspected leak.

Probe Expands Beyond Individual Responsibility

Officials believe the case may reflect broader structural vulnerabilities rather than isolated wrongdoing. The investigation is now focused on mapping communication patterns among officials, experts, and intermediaries involved in various stages of exam preparation.

Authorities are also tracking financial transactions to determine whether payments were made in exchange for access to confidential materials.

The CBI maintains that as the investigation progresses, additional individuals and operational links within the alleged network are likely to emerge.

Conclusion

The NEET UG 2026 paper leak investigation has developed into a large-scale probe examining both individual involvement and systemic weaknesses in exam security. With multiple suspects under scrutiny and digital evidence under review, authorities are working to determine whether an organized insider network facilitated the breach.