Business
Cannabis retailer Fire & Flower granted creditor protection after ‘significant net losses’
Fire & Flower Holdings and its cannabis subsidiaries have received an initial order for creditor protection from a Canadian court after raking up significant net losses of more than 200 million Canadian dollars ($150 million) since 2018.
The Toronto-based company said it was granted the order by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA), allowing it to maintain the status quo and consult with stakeholders with a view to continuing operations.
To that end, the court approved Fire & Flower’s debtor-in-possession loan of CA$9.8 million from an affiliate of Alimentation Couche-Tard, a large Canadian operator of convenience stores, which owns a stake in the cannabis retailer.
In a news release, Fire & Flower said creditor protection allows the company to work with the monitor – FTI Consulting Canada – to streamline its operations and conduct a court-supervised sales process to obtain a going concern for its operations and maximize the value of its assets.
The debtor-in-possession loan is expected to fund its operations during this process.
Fire & Flower is only the latest in a flood of Canadian cannabis companies turning to Canada’s corporate insolvency law.
Between Jan. 1 and Dec. 22, 2022, 14 of the 35 CCAA filings in Canada involved companies operating in the cannabis space in one way or another.
Fire & Flower has more than 90 corporate-owned stores in its network.
The company had approximately 618 full-time employees and 806 part-time employees as of the end of 2022.
Last week, Fire & Flower said it was “reviewing strategic options including financing options,” as the company requires more funding to continue doing business.
In a May 15 regulatory filing, Fire & Flower management stated that its ability to continue as a going concern depended on “increasing revenues, improving profitability and cash flows, availability of funding from debt, warrants and other capital market alternatives.”
After the review, the directors of the company determined “that it was is in the best interests of the company to file an application for creditor protection under the CCAA,” per the news release.
In a factum submitted to the court, Fire & Flower said its “significant net losses” largely stemmed from the cannabis retail operations.
Fire & Flower cited:
- Increased competition and operating costs.
- Margin pressure.
“Regulatory restrictions suffered by the companies and the cannabis industry generally have collectively contributed to significantly lower revenues and higher costs than what the applicants expected their cannabis retail stores would face,” according to the company’s filing.
Fire & Flower said it has lost money every year since 2018.
In the fiscal years ended Jan. 29, 2022, and Dec. 31, 2022, respectively, Fire & Flower and its subsidiaries lost $45.4 million and $83.4 million.
Fire & Flower’s net losses also include:
- More than CA$25.2 million for the fiscal year ended Feb. 2, 2019.
- More than CA$35.6 million for fiscal 2020.
- More than CA$17.5 million for fiscal 2021.
For the quarter ended March 31, 2023, the company said it had a net loss of roughly CA$8.7 million.
In its filing, Fire & Flower said its cash position continually deteriorated over the course of the past two years.
As of Jan. 30, 2021, the company and its subsidiaries had CA$30.6 million in cash. One year later, that total had fallen to CA$19.8 million.
As of March 31, 2023, Fire & Flower and its subsidiaries had CA$8.2 million in cash and more than CA$50.8 million in current liabilities.
“That position only deteriorated further since then,” according to the filing.
Some of the other subsidiaries named in the court order were:
- Friendly Stranger Holdings, which Fire & Flower acquired for approximately CA$24.6 million in 2020.
- Pineapple Express Delivery, which was purchased for roughly CA$7.2 million in 2021.
- Hifyre, a digital retail and analytics platform.
Fire & Flower shares trade as FAF on the Toronto Stock Exchange.
Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/canadian-cannabis-retailer-fire-flower-granted-creditor-protection/
Business
New Mexico cannabis operator fined, loses license for alleged BioTrack fraud
New Mexico regulators fined a cannabis operator nearly $300,000 and revoked its license after the company allegedly created fake reports in the state’s traceability software.
The New Mexico Cannabis Control Division (CCD) accused marijuana manufacturer and retailer Golden Roots of 11 violations, according to Albuquerque Business First.
Golden Roots operates the The Cannabis Revolution Dispensary.
The majority of the violations are related to the Albuquerque company’s improper use of BioTrack, which has been New Mexico’s track-and-trace vendor since 2015.
The CCD alleges Golden Roots reported marijuana production only two months after it had received its vertically integrated license, according to Albuquerque Business First.
Because cannabis takes longer than two months to be cultivated, the CCD was suspicious of the report.
After inspecting the company’s premises, the CCD alleged Golden Roots reported cultivation, transportation and sales in BioTrack but wasn’t able to provide officers who inspected the site evidence that the operator was cultivating cannabis.
In April, the CCD revoked Golden Roots’ license and issued a $10,000 fine, according to the news outlet.
The company requested a hearing, which the regulator scheduled for Sept. 1.
At the hearing, the CCD testified that the company’s dried-cannabis weights in BioTrack were suspicious because they didn’t seem to accurately reflect how much weight marijuana loses as it dries.
Company employees also poorly accounted for why they were making adjustments in the system of up to 24 pounds of cannabis, making comments such as “bad” or “mistake” in the software, Albuquerque Business First reported.
Golden Roots was fined $298,972.05 – the amount regulators allege the company made selling products that weren’t properly accounted for in BioTrack.
The CCD has been cracking down on cannabis operators accused of selling products procured from out-of-state or not grown legally:
- Regulators alleged in August that Albuquerque dispensary Sawmill Sweet Leaf sold out-of-state products and didn’t have a license for extraction.
- Paradise Exotics Distro lost its license in July after regulators alleged the company sold products made in California.
Golden Roots was the first alleged rulebreaker in New Mexico to be asked to pay a large fine.
Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/new-mexico-cannabis-operator-fined-loses-license-for-alleged-biotrack-fraud/
Business
Marijuana companies suing US attorney general in federal prohibition challenge
Four marijuana companies, including a multistate operator, have filed a lawsuit against U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland in which they allege the federal MJ prohibition under the Controlled Substances Act is no longer constitutional.
According to the complaint, filed Thursday in U.S. District Court in Massachusetts, retailer Canna Provisions, Treevit delivery service CEO Gyasi Sellers, cultivator Wiseacre Farm and MSO Verano Holdings Corp. are all harmed by “the federal government’s unconstitutional ban on cultivating, manufacturing, distributing, or possessing intrastate marijuana.”
Verano is headquartered in Chicago but has operations in Massachusetts; the other three operators are based in Massachusetts.
The lawsuit seeks a ruling that the “Controlled Substances Act is unconstitutional as applied to the intrastate cultivation, manufacture, possession, and distribution of marijuana pursuant to state law.”
The companies want the case to go before the U.S. Supreme Court.
They hired prominent law firm Boies Schiller Flexner to represent them.
The New York-based firm’s principal is David Boies, whose former clients include Microsoft, former presidential candidate Al Gore and Elizabeth Holmes’ disgraced startup Theranos.
Similar challenges to the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA) have failed.
One such challenge led to a landmark Supreme Court decision in 2005.
In Gonzalez vs. Raich, the highest court in the United States ruled in a 6-3 decision that the commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution gave Congress the power to outlaw marijuana federally, even though state laws allow the cultivation and sale of cannabis.
In the 18 years since that ruling, 23 states and the District of Columbia have legalized adult-use marijuana and the federal government has allowed a multibillion-dollar cannabis industry to thrive.
Since both Congress and the U.S. Department of Justice, currently headed by Garland, have declined to intervene in state-licensed marijuana markets, the key facts that led to the Supreme Court’s 2005 ruling “no longer apply,” Boies said in a statement Thursday.
“The Supreme Court has since made clear that the federal government lacks the authority to regulate purely intrastate commerce,” Boies said.
“Moreover, the facts on which those precedents are based are no longer true.”
Verano President Darren Weiss said in a statement the company is “prepared to bring this case all the way to the Supreme Court in order to align federal law with how Congress has acted for years.”
While the Biden administration’s push to reschedule marijuana would help solve marijuana operators’ federal tax woes, neither rescheduling nor modest Congressional reforms such as the SAFER Banking Act “solve the fundamental issue,” Weiss added.
“The application of the CSA to lawful state-run cannabis business is an unconstitutional overreach on state sovereignty that has led to decades of harm, failed businesses, lost jobs, and unsafe working conditions.”
Business
Alabama to make another attempt Dec. 1 to award medical cannabis licenses
Alabama regulators are targeting Dec. 1 to award the first batch of medical cannabis business licenses after the agency’s first two attempts were scrapped because of scoring errors and litigation.
The first licenses will be awarded to individual cultivators, delivery providers, processors, dispensaries and state testing labs, according to the Alabama Medical Cannabis Commission (AMCC).
Then, on Dec. 12, the AMCC will award licenses for vertically integrated operations, a designation set primarily for multistate operators.
Licenses are expected to be handed out 28 days after they have been awarded, so MMJ production could begin in early January, according to the Alabama Daily News.
That means MMJ products could be available for patients around early March, an AMCC spokesperson told the media outlet.
Regulators initially awarded 21 business licenses in June, only to void them after applicants alleged inconsistencies with how the applications were scored.
Then, in August, the state awarded 24 different licenses – 19 went to June recipients – only to reverse themselves again and scratch those licenses after spurned applicants filed lawsuits.
A state judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by Chicago-based MSO Verano Holdings Corp., but another lawsuit is pending.
Source: https://mjbizdaily.com/alabama-plans-to-award-medical-cannabis-licenses-dec-1/
-
Business1 year ago
Pot Odor Does Not Justify Probable Cause for Vehicle Searches, Minnesota Court Affirms
-
Business1 year ago
New Mexico cannabis operator fined, loses license for alleged BioTrack fraud
-
Business1 year ago
Alabama to make another attempt Dec. 1 to award medical cannabis licenses
-
Business1 year ago
Washington State Pays Out $9.4 Million in Refunds Relating to Drug Convictions
-
Business1 year ago
Marijuana companies suing US attorney general in federal prohibition challenge
-
Business1 year ago
Legal Marijuana Handed A Nothing Burger From NY State
-
Business1 year ago
Can Cannabis Help Seasonal Depression
-
Blogs1 year ago
Cannabis Art Is Flourishing On Etsy